Literature DB >> 16586340

Reproducibility of time at or near VO2max during intermittent treadmill running.

A W Midgley1, L R McNaughton, S Carroll.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the reproducibility of time at or above 90 % (t (90 % )VO (2max)) and 95 % (t (95 % )VO (2max)) maximal oxygen uptake during an intermittent treadmill run to exhaustion. Twenty-two distance runners (age 38.0 +/- 7.1 yrs) performed two identical incremental and two identical intermittent tests on four separate days. Respiratory exchange was measured continuously throughout each test by an automated open-circuit gas analysis system. The incremental test consisted of increases in treadmill speed every minute until volitional exhaustion. The highest averaged 30-s oxygen uptake (VO (2)) value was defined as VO (2max) and the minimum speed that elicited VO (2max) was defined as vVO (2max). The intermittent test consisted of 30-s work intervals ran at 105 % vVO (2max) interspersed by 30-s relief intervals ran at 60 % vVO (2max) and was continued until volitional exhaustion. The time that VO (2) was at or above 90 % and 95 % of the mean maximum values elicited during the two previous incremental tests was determined for the intermittent tests. The mean t (95 % )VO (2max) was 232 (SD 174) s and 244 (SD 195) s and the mean t (90 % )VO (2max) was 480 (SD 220) s and 488 (SD 252) s, for trial 1 and trial 2, respectively. Reproducibility statistics for t (95 % )VO (2max) and t (90 % )VO (2max), respectively, were: 95 % limits of agreement 12 +/- 227 s and 8 +/- 328 s; coefficient of variation 34.5 % and 24.5 %; and intraclass correlation coefficient 0.80 and 0.75. Statistical power analysis indicated that this level of reproducibility would allow mean differences of 15 - 20 % between intermittent training protocols to attain statistical significance in future experimental research, with sample sizes probably within the resources of most researchers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16586340     DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-923856

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Med        ISSN: 0172-4622            Impact factor:   3.118


  10 in total

1.  The verification phase and reliability of physiological parameters in peak testing of elite wheelchair athletes.

Authors:  Christof A Leicht; Keith Tolfrey; John P Lenton; Nicolette C Bishop; Victoria L Goosey-Tolfrey
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Interval training in the boundaries of severe domain: effects on aerobic parameters.

Authors:  Tiago Turnes; Rafael Alves de Aguiar; Rogério Santos de Oliveira Cruz; Fabrizio Caputo
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Influence of exercise intensity on time spent at high percentage of maximal oxygen uptake during an intermittent session in young endurance-trained athletes.

Authors:  Delphine Thevenet; Magaly Tardieu; Hassane Zouhal; Christophe Jacob; Ben Abderraouf Abderrahman; Jacques Prioux
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2007-09-13       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Physiological and Psychological Responses during Low-Volume High-Intensity Interval Training Sessions with Different Work-Recovery Durations.

Authors:  Luiz Fernando Farias-Junior; Geovani Araújo Dantas Macêdo; Rodrigo Alberto Vieira Browne; Yuri Alberto Freire; Filipe Fernandes Oliveira-Dantas; Daniel Schwade; Arnaldo Luis Mortatti; Tony Meireles Santos; Eduardo Caldas Costa
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 5.  High-intensity interval training, solutions to the programming puzzle: Part I: cardiopulmonary emphasis.

Authors:  Martin Buchheit; Paul B Laursen
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  The physiological, perceptual and neuromuscular responses of team sport athletes to a running and cycling high intensity interval training session.

Authors:  Craig Twist; Richard Bott; Jamie Highton
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 3.346

Review 7.  Challenging a dogma of exercise physiology: does an incremental exercise test for valid VO 2 max determination really need to last between 8 and 12 minutes?

Authors:  Adrian W Midgley; David J Bentley; Hans Luttikholt; Lars R McNaughton; Gregoire P Millet
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  Evaluating intervention fidelity: an example from a high-intensity interval training study.

Authors:  Kathryn L Taylor; Matthew Weston; Alan M Batterham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Changes of direction during high-intensity intermittent runs: neuromuscular and metabolic responses.

Authors:  Karim Hader; Alberto Mendez-Villanueva; Said Ahmaidi; Ben K Williams; Martin Buchheit
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2014-01-13

10.  Tolerance to high-intensity intermittent running exercise: do oxygen uptake kinetics really matter?

Authors:  Martin Buchheit; Karim Hader; Alberto Mendez-Villanueva
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 4.566

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.