Literature DB >> 18488658

Capturing spatial attention with multisensory cues.

Valerio Santangelo1, Cristy Ho, Charles Spence.   

Abstract

We assessed the influence ofmultisensory interactions on the exogenous orienting of spatial attention by comparing the ability of auditory, tactile, and audiotactile exogenous cues to capture visuospatial attention under conditions of no perceptual load versus high perceptual load. In Experiment 1, participants discriminated the elevation of visual targets preceded by either unimodal or bimodal cues under conditions of either a high perceptual load (involving the monitoring of a rapidly presented central stream of visual letters for occasionally presented target digits) or no perceptual load (when the central stream was replaced by a fixation point). All of the cues captured spatial attention in the no-load condition, whereas only the bimodal cues captured visuospatial attention in the high-load condition. In Experiment 2, we ruled out the possibility that the presentation of any changing stimulus at fixation (i.e., a passively monitored stream of letters) would eliminate exogenous orienting, which instead appears to be a consequence of high perceptual load conditions (Experiment 1). These results demonstrate that multisensory cues capture spatial attention more effectively than unimodal cues under conditions of concurrent perceptual load.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18488658     DOI: 10.3758/pbr.15.2.398

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  25 in total

1.  Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging of crossmodal binding in the human heteromodal cortex.

Authors:  G A Calvert; R Campbell; M J Brammer
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Cross-modal enhancement of perceived brightness: sensory interaction versus response bias.

Authors:  Eric C Odgaard; Yoav Arieh; Lawrence E Marks
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2003-01

3.  Orienting in space and time: joint contributions to exogenous spatial cuing effects.

Authors:  Bruce Milliken; Juan Lupiáñez; Martha Roberts; Biljana Stevanovski
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-12

Review 4.  Distracted and confused?: selective attention under load.

Authors:  Nilli Lavie
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Assessing the effectiveness of various auditory cues in capturing a driver's visual attention.

Authors:  Cristy Ho; Charles Spence
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2005-09

6.  Competition between endogenous and exogenous orienting of visual attention.

Authors:  Andrea Berger; Avishai Henik; Robert Rafal
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2005-05

7.  Spatial attention triggered by unimodal, crossmodal, and bimodal exogenous cues: a comparison of reflexive orienting mechanisms.

Authors:  Valerio Santangelo; Rob H J Van der Lubbe; Marta Olivetti Belardinelli; Albert Postma
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-18       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 8.  Multisensory integration: space, time and superadditivity.

Authors:  Nicholas P Holmes; Charles Spence
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2005-09-20       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  How automatic are audiovisual links in exogenous spatial attention?

Authors:  Veronica Mazza; Massimo Turatto; Martina Rossi; Carlo Umiltà
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2006-04-03       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  An irrelevant light enhances auditory detection in humans: a psychophysical analysis of multisensory integration in stimulus detection.

Authors:  Christopher T Lovelace; Barry E Stein; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2003-07
View more
  17 in total

1.  Influence of auditory and audiovisual stimuli on the right-left prevalence effect.

Authors:  Kim-Phuong L Vu; Katsumi Minakata; Mary Kim Ngo
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-10-06

2.  Re-examining the contribution of visuospatial working memory to inhibition of return.

Authors:  Ana B Vivas; Ioanna Liaromati; Elvira Masoura; Katerina Chatzikallia
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-01-21

3.  An event-related FMRI study of exogenous orienting across vision and audition.

Authors:  Zhen Yang; Andrew R Mayer
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 4.  The concept of homology as a basis for evaluating developmental mechanisms: exploring selective attention across the life-span.

Authors:  Robert Lickliter; Lorraine E Bahrick
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 3.038

5.  Guiding spatial attention by multimodal reward cues.

Authors:  Vincent Hoofs; Ivan Grahek; C Nico Boehler; Ruth M Krebs
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Multisensory warning signals: when spatial correspondence matters.

Authors:  Cristy Ho; Valerio Santangelo; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-04-19       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  The interactions of multisensory integration with endogenous and exogenous attention.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Tang; Jinglong Wu; Yong Shen
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  Exogenous Bimodal Cues Attenuate Age-Related Audiovisual Integration.

Authors:  Yanna Ren; Ying Zhang; Yawei Hou; Junyuan Li; Junhao Bi; Weiping Yang
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2021-05-27

9.  Evidence for multisensory integration in the elicitation of prior entry by bimodal cues.

Authors:  Doug J K Barrett; Katrin Krumbholz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Crossmodal semantic congruence can affect visuo-spatial processing and activity of the fronto-parietal attention networks.

Authors:  Serena Mastroberardino; Valerio Santangelo; Emiliano Macaluso
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.