Literature DB >> 18488134

Paper versus web-based administration of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory 20 and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire 7.

Victoria L Handa1, Matthew D Barber, Stephen B Young, Michael P Aronson, Abraham Morse, Geoffrey W Cundiff.   

Abstract

Web-based questionnaires are increasingly employed for clinical research. To investigate whether web-based and paper versions of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory 20 (PFDI-20) and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire 7 (PFIQ-7) yield similar results, we compared results obtained with these two modes of administration. Women with pelvic floor disorders completed both versions of these questionnaires. Scores between modes of administration were compared using the paired t test and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Among the 52 participants, there were no significant differences in scores or scale scores between the web-based and paper questionnaires. The ICC was 0.91 for the PFDI-20 score and 0.81 for the PFIQ-7 score (p < 0.001 for each). The web-based format was preferred by 22 participants (53%), ten (24%) preferred the paper format, and nine (21%) had no preference. The acceptability and score equivalence recommend these web-based questionnaires as an alternative to paper questionnaires for clinical research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18488134      PMCID: PMC2705881          DOI: 10.1007/s00192-008-0651-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct


  14 in total

1.  Adolescent sexual behavior, drug use, and violence: increased reporting with computer survey technology.

Authors:  C F Turner; L Ku; S M Rogers; L D Lindberg; J H Pleck; F L Sonenstein
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-05-08       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Psychometric evaluation of 2 comprehensive condition-specific quality of life instruments for women with pelvic floor disorders.

Authors:  M D Barber; M N Kuchibhatla; C F Pieper; R C Bump
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  A 2-year anatomical and functional assessment of transvaginal rectocele repair using a polypropylene mesh.

Authors:  Renaud de Tayrac; Olivier Picone; Aurélia Chauveaud-Lambling; Hervé Fernandez
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2005-05-21

4.  Automated collection of quality-of-life data: a comparison of paper and computer touch-screen questionnaires.

Authors:  G Velikova; E P Wright; A B Smith; A Cull; A Gould; D Forman; T Perren; M Stead; J Brown; P J Selby
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7).

Authors:  M D Barber; M D Walters; R C Bump
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  A comparative trial of paper-and-pencil versus computer administration of the Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) questionnaire.

Authors:  L Kleinman; N K Leidy; J Crawley; A Bonomi; P Schoenfeld
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Prolapse severity, symptoms and impact on quality of life among women planning sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  M P Fitzgerald; N K Janz; P A Wren; J T Wei; A M Weber; C Ghetti; G W Cundiff
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 3.561

8.  Electronic pain questionnaires: a randomized, crossover comparison with paper questionnaires for chronic pain assessment.

Authors:  Andrew J Cook; David A Roberts; Michael D Henderson; Lisa C Van Winkle; Dania C Chastain; Robin J Hamill-Ruth
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 6.961

9.  Validation and patient acceptance of a computer touch screen version of the WOMAC 3.1 osteoarthritis index.

Authors:  H A Bischoff-Ferrari; M Vondechend; N Bellamy; R Theiler
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 19.103

10.  Electronic versus paper questionnaires: a further comparison in persons with asthma.

Authors:  D M Bushnell; M L Martin; B Parasuraman
Journal:  J Asthma       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.515

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Mode of administration does not cause bias in patient-reported outcome results: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Claudia Rutherford; Daniel Costa; Rebecca Mercieca-Bebber; Holly Rice; Liam Gabb; Madeleine King
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Validation of web-based administration of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire (PISQ-12).

Authors:  Brent A Parnell; Gena C Dunivan; Annamarie Connolly; Mary L Jannelli; Ellen C Wells; Elizabeth J Geller
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Norwegian translation, and validation, of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) and the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7).

Authors:  Catherine J Teig; Margreth Grotle; Malcolm J Bond; Cecilia A C Prinsen; Marie A Ellström Engh; Milada S Cvancarova; Møyfrid Kjøllesdal; Angelita Martini
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 4.  Measuring outcomes in urogynecological surgery: "perspective is everything".

Authors:  Candace Y Parker-Autry; Matthew D Barber; Kimberly Kenton; Holly E Richter
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Validation of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for web-based administration.

Authors:  Catrina C Crisp; Angela N Fellner; Rachel N Pauls
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 6.  Equivalence of electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome measures.

Authors:  Niloufar Campbell; Faraz Ali; Andrew Y Finlay; Sam S Salek
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-02-22       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Web versus paper-based completion of the epidemiology of prolapse and incontinence questionnaire.

Authors:  Marlene J Egger; Emily S Lukacz; Megan Newhouse; Jia Wang; Ingrid Nygaard
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.091

8.  Time efficiency of a web-based questionnaire in urogynecology: a randomized study.

Authors:  Selina Posthuma; J Marinus van der Ploeg; Britt A H van Etten-deBruijn; David P van der Ham
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  High Level of Agreement between Electronic and Paper Mode of Administration of a Thyroid-Specific Patient-Reported Outcome, ThyPRO.

Authors:  Sofie Larsen Rasmussen; Lars Rejnmark; Eva Ebbehøj; Ulla Feldt-Rasmussen; Åse Krogh Rasmussen; Jakob Bue Bjorner; Torquil Watt
Journal:  Eur Thyroid J       Date:  2016-03-04

10.  Integrating cancer survivors' experiences into UK cancer registries: design and development of the ePOCS system (electronic Patient-reported Outcomes from Cancer Survivors).

Authors:  L Ashley; H Jones; J Thomas; D Forman; A Newsham; E Morris; O Johnson; G Velikova; P Wright
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.