Catrina C Crisp1, Angela N Fellner, Rachel N Pauls. 1. Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, TriHealth Good Samaritan Hospital, Cincinnati, OH, USA, Catrina_Crisp@trihealth.com.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Web-based questionnaires are becoming increasingly valuable for clinical research. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) is the gold standard for evaluating female sexual function; yet, it has not been validated in this format. We sought to validate the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for web-based administration. METHODS: Subjects enrolled in a web-based research survey of sexual function from the general population were invited to participate in this validation study. The first 151 respondents were included. Validation participants completed the web-based version of the FSFI followed by a mailed paper-based version. Demographic data were collected for all subjects. Scores were compared using the paired t test and the intraclass correlation coefficient. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-one subjects completed both web- and paper-based versions of the FSFI. Those subjects participating in the validation study did not differ in demographics or FSFI scores from the remaining subjects in the general population study. Total web-based and paper-based FSFI scores were not significantly different (mean 20.31 and 20.29 respectively, p = 0.931). The six domains or subscales of the FSFI were similar when comparing web and paper scores. Finally, intraclass correlation analysis revealed a high degree of correlation between total and subscale scores, r = 0.848-0.943, p < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: Web-based administration of the FSFI is a valid alternative to the paper-based version.
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Web-based questionnaires are becoming increasingly valuable for clinical research. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) is the gold standard for evaluating female sexual function; yet, it has not been validated in this format. We sought to validate the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for web-based administration. METHODS: Subjects enrolled in a web-based research survey of sexual function from the general population were invited to participate in this validation study. The first 151 respondents were included. Validation participants completed the web-based version of the FSFI followed by a mailed paper-based version. Demographic data were collected for all subjects. Scores were compared using the paired t test and the intraclass correlation coefficient. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-one subjects completed both web- and paper-based versions of the FSFI. Those subjects participating in the validation study did not differ in demographics or FSFI scores from the remaining subjects in the general population study. Total web-based and paper-based FSFI scores were not significantly different (mean 20.31 and 20.29 respectively, p = 0.931). The six domains or subscales of the FSFI were similar when comparing web and paper scores. Finally, intraclass correlation analysis revealed a high degree of correlation between total and subscale scores, r = 0.848-0.943, p < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: Web-based administration of the FSFI is a valid alternative to the paper-based version.
Authors: Brent A Parnell; Gena C Dunivan; Annamarie Connolly; Mary L Jannelli; Ellen C Wells; Elizabeth J Geller Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2010-10-23 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Victoria L Handa; Matthew D Barber; Stephen B Young; Michael P Aronson; Abraham Morse; Geoffrey W Cundiff Journal: Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct Date: 2008-05-17
Authors: Catrina C Crisp; Christine M Vaccaro; Apurva Pancholy; Steve Kleeman; Angela N Fellner; Rachel Pauls Journal: Sex Med Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 2.491