Literature DB >> 18486746

Motor-evoked potentials recorded from lumbar erector spinae muscles: a study of corticospinal excitability changes associated with spinal manipulation.

J Donald Dishman1, Douglas S Greco, Jeanmarie R Burke.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine if high-velocity, low-amplitude spinal manipulation (SM) altered the effects of corticospinal excitability on motoneuron activity innervating the paraspinal muscles. In a previous study using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), augmentation of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) from the gastrocnemius muscle after lumbar SM was reported. To date, there is no known report of the effect of SM on paraspinal muscle excitability.
METHODS: The experimental design was a prospective physiologic evaluation of the effects of SM on corticospinal excitability in asymptomatic subjects. The TMS-induced MEPs were recorded from relaxed lumbar erector spinae muscles of 72 asymptomatic subjects. The MEP amplitudes were evaluated pre-SM and post-SM or conditions involving prethrust positioning and joint loading or control.
RESULTS: There was a transient increase in MEP amplitudes from the paraspinal muscles as a consequence of lumbar SM (F([6,414]) = 8.49; P < .05) without concomitant changes after prethrust positioning and joint loading or in control subjects (P > .05). These data findings were substantiated by a significant condition x time interaction term (F([12,414]) = 2.28; P < .05).
CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that there is a postsynaptic facilitation of alpha motoneurons and/or corticomotoneurons innervating paraspinal muscles as a consequence of SM. It appears that SM may offer unique sensory input to the excitability of the motor system as compared to prethrust positioning and joint loading and control conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18486746     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther        ISSN: 0161-4754            Impact factor:   1.437


  18 in total

Review 1.  An independent review of NCCAM-funded studies of chiropractic.

Authors:  Edzard Ernst; Paul Posadzki
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  A randomized control trial to determine the effectiveness and physiological effects of spinal manipulation and spinal mobilization compared to each other and a sham condition in patients with chronic low back pain: Study protocol for The RELIEF Study.

Authors:  Brian C Clark; David W Russ; Masato Nakazawa; Christopher R France; Stevan Walkowski; Timothy D Law; Megan Applegate; Niladri Mahato; Samuel Lietkam; James Odenthal; Daniel Corcos; Simeon Hain; Betty Sindelar; Robert J Ploutz-Snyder; James S Thomas
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  Paraspinal Muscle Spindle Response to Intervertebral Fixation and Segmental Thrust Level During Spinal Manipulation in an Animal Model.

Authors:  William R Reed; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Immediate effects of a thoracic spine thrust manipulation on the autonomic nervous system: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Rob Sillevis; Joshua Cleland; Madeleine Hellman; Kristina Beekhuizen
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2010-12

5.  Preliminary investigation of the mechanisms underlying the effects of manipulation: exploration of a multivariate model including spinal stiffness, multifidus recruitment, and clinical findings.

Authors:  Julie M Fritz; Shane L Koppenhaver; Gregory N Kawchuk; Deydre S Teyhen; Jeffrey J Hebert; John D Childs
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Utilizing transcranial magnetic stimulation to study the human neuromuscular system.

Authors:  David A Goss; Richard L Hoffman; Brian C Clark
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 7.  Basis for spinal manipulative therapy: a physical therapist perspective.

Authors:  Joel E Bialosky; Corey B Simon; Mark D Bishop; Steven Z George
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 2.368

8.  Regional interdependence and manual therapy directed at the thoracic spine.

Authors:  Amy McDevitt; Jodi Young; Paul Mintken; Josh Cleland
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2015-07

9.  Identification of potential neuromotor mechanisms of manual therapy in patients with musculoskeletal disablement: rationale and description of a clinical trial.

Authors:  Beth E Fisher; Todd E Davenport; Kornelia Kulig; Allan D Wu
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 2.474

10.  Common errors and clinical guidelines for manual muscle testing: "the arm test" and other inaccurate procedures.

Authors:  Walter H Schmitt; Scott C Cuthbert
Journal:  Chiropr Osteopat       Date:  2008-12-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.