Literature DB >> 22197083

Basis for spinal manipulative therapy: a physical therapist perspective.

Joel E Bialosky1, Corey B Simon, Mark D Bishop, Steven Z George.   

Abstract

Physical therapists internationally provide spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) to patients with musculoskeletal pain complaints. SMT has been a part of physical therapist practice since the profession's beginning. Early physical therapist clinical decision making for SMT was influenced by the approaches of osteopathic and orthopedic physicians at the time. Currently a segmental clinical decision making approach and a responder clinical decision making approach are two of the more common models through which physical therapist clinical use of SMT is directed. The focus of segmental clinical decision making is upon identifying a dysfunctional vertebral segment with the application of SMT to restore mobility and/or alleviate pain. The responder clinical decision making approach attempts to categorize individuals based on a pattern of signs and symptoms suggesting a likely positive response to SMT. The present manuscript provides an overview of common physical therapist clinical decision making approaches to SMT and presents areas requiring further study in order to optimize patient response.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22197083      PMCID: PMC3461123          DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2011.11.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol        ISSN: 1050-6411            Impact factor:   2.368


  46 in total

1.  Reproducibility and repeatability: errors of three groups of physiotherapists in locating spinal levels by palpation.

Authors:  E V Billis; N E Foster; C C Wright
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2003-11

2.  Altered central integration of dual somatosensory input after cervical spine manipulation.

Authors:  Heidi Haavik Taylor; Bernadette Murphy
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.437

Review 3.  Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain.

Authors:  B W Koes; M W van Tulder; S Thomas
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-06-17

4.  In the best interests of the patient.

Authors:  Stanley V Paris
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2006-11

5.  Spinal reflex attenuation associated with spinal manipulation.

Authors:  J D Dishman; R Bulbulian
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 6.  Reliability of spinal palpation for diagnosis of back and neck pain: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Michael A Seffinger; Wadie I Najm; Shiraz I Mishra; Alan Adams; Vivian M Dickerson; Linda S Murphy; Sibylle Reinsch
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Determining cavitation location during lumbar and thoracic spinal manipulation: is spinal manipulation accurate and specific?

Authors:  J Kim Ross; David E Bereznick; Stuart M McGill
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Spinal manipulative therapy has an immediate effect on thermal pain sensitivity in people with low back pain: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Joel E Bialosky; Mark D Bishop; Michael E Robinson; Giorgio Zeppieri; Steven Z George
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2009-10-01

9.  The mechanisms of manual therapy in the treatment of musculoskeletal pain: a comprehensive model.

Authors:  Joel E Bialosky; Mark D Bishop; Don D Price; Michael E Robinson; Steven Z George
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2008-11-21

10.  Immediate hypoalgesic and motor effects after a single cervical spine manipulation in subjects with lateral epicondylalgia.

Authors:  Josué Fernández-Carnero; Cesar Fernández-de-las-Peñas; Joshua A Cleland
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.437

View more
  15 in total

1.  Effects of Axial Torsion on Disc Height Distribution: An In Vivo Study.

Authors:  Alejandro A Espinoza Orías; Nicole M Mammoser; John J Triano; Howard S An; Gunnar B J Andersson; Nozomu Inoue
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 1.437

2.  Can we keep this simple, please?: The challenge of explaining manipulation to patients.

Authors:  Dan Vaughn
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2014-11

3.  Manual physical therapy for chronic pain: the complex whole is greater than the sum of its parts.

Authors:  Rogelio A Coronado; Joel E Bialosky
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2017-06-12

4.  Credibility of manual therapy is at stake 'Where do we go from here?'

Authors:  Rob A B Oostendorp
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2018-07-31

5.  Spinal manipulation does not affect pressure pain thresholds in the absence of neuromodulators: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Max K Jordon; Paul F Beattie; Sarah D'Urso; Sarah Scriven
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2016-09-12

6.  The evolution of manual therapy education: what are we waiting for?

Authors:  William H Kolb; Amy Wallace McDevitt; Jodi Young; Eric Shamus
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2020-02

7.  Neural responses to the mechanical parameters of a high-velocity, low-amplitude spinal manipulation: effect of preload parameters.

Authors:  William R Reed; Cynthia R Long; Gregory N Kawchuk; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 1.437

8.  Cervicothoracic junction thrust manipulation in the multimodal management of a patient with temporomandibular disorder.

Authors:  Dhinu J Jayaseelan; Nancy S Tow
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2016-05

9.  Regional interdependence and manual therapy directed at the thoracic spine.

Authors:  Amy McDevitt; Jodi Young; Paul Mintken; Josh Cleland
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2015-07

10.  Belief reinforcement: one reason why costs for low back pain have not decreased.

Authors:  Max Zusman
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2013-05-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.