Literature DB >> 18484856

Predicting visual acuity from wavefront aberrations.

Andrew B Watson1, Albert J Ahumada.   

Abstract

It is now possible to routinely measure the aberrations of the human eye, but there is as yet no established metric that relates aberrations to visual acuity. A number of metrics have been proposed and evaluated, and some perform well on particular sets of evaluation data. But these metrics are not based on a plausible model of the letter acuity task and may not generalize to other sets of aberrations, other data sets, or to other acuity tasks. Here we provide a model of the acuity task that incorporates optical and neural filtering, neural noise, and an ideal decision rule. The model provides an excellent account of one large set of evaluation data. Several suboptimal rules perform almost as well. A simple metric derived from this model also provides a good account of the data set.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18484856     DOI: 10.1167/8.4.17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  22 in total

1.  Optimizing wavefront-guided corrections for highly aberrated eyes in the presence of registration uncertainty.

Authors:  Yue Shi; Hope M Queener; Jason D Marsack; Ayeswarya Ravikumar; Harold E Bedell; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Impact of pupil transmission apodization on presbyopic through-focus visual performance with spherical aberration.

Authors:  Len Zheleznyak; HaeWon Jung; Geunyoung Yoon
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Visual impact of Zernike and Seidel forms of monochromatic aberrations.

Authors:  Xu Cheng; Arthur Bradley; Sowmya Ravikumar; Larry N Thibos
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  Unbiased estimation of refractive state of aberrated eyes.

Authors:  Jesson Martin; Balamurali Vasudevan; Nikole Himebaugh; Arthur Bradley; Larry Thibos
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  The role of sensory ocular dominance on through-focus visual performance in monovision presbyopia corrections.

Authors:  Len Zheleznyak; Aixa Alarcon; Kevin C Dieter; Duje Tadin; Geunyoung Yoon
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  The external noise normalized gain profile of spatial vision.

Authors:  Fang Hou; Zhong-Lin Lu; Chang-Bing Huang
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Higher-contrast requirements for recognizing low-pass-filtered letters.

Authors:  MiYoung Kwon; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Comparing the minimum spatial-frequency content for recognizing Chinese and alphabet characters.

Authors:  Hui Wang; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Comparison of spherical aberration and small-pupil profiles in improving depth of focus for presbyopic corrections.

Authors:  Adam Hickenbotham; Pavan Tiruveedhula; Austin Roorda
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2012-09-30       Impact factor: 3.351

10.  Using geometric moments to explain human letter recognition near the acuity limit.

Authors:  Lei Liu; Stanley A Klein; Feng Xue; Jun-Yun Zhang; Cong Yu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.