Literature DB >> 18484820

Motion processing at low light levels: Differential effects on the perception of specific motion types.

Jutta Billino1, Frank Bremmer, Karl R Gegenfurtner.   

Abstract

While many aspects of human vision at low light levels have been studied in great detail, motion perception has rarely been investigated so far. Here we address differential effects of light level on the perception of coherent motion, heading from radial flow, and biological motion. We determined detection thresholds under photopic, mesopic, and scotopic conditions. Results indicate that the perception of specific motion types differs in vulnerability to changes in light level. Thresholds for coherent motion and heading from radial flow increased monotonically from photopic to mesopic and scotopic light levels. We suppose that observed deficits are due to temporal pooling under rod-dominated vision. In contrast, detection thresholds for biological motion, which is distinguished by temporal dynamics and a specific spatial distribution of nearby signals, were exclusively elevated under mesopic conditions. Thresholds under scotopic conditions matched those under photopic conditions. Selective constraints under mesopic conditions might be explained by a detrimental interaction of rod and cone vision as well as by activity of different rod pathways. Findings suggest that very early retinal signal processing can have complex effects on the perception of different motion types, which is generally considered to rely on cortical areas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18484820     DOI: 10.1167/8.3.14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  8 in total

1.  Visual discomfort from flicker: Effects of mean light level and contrast.

Authors:  Sanae Yoshimoto; Fang Jiang; Tatsuto Takeuchi; Arnold J Wilkins; Michael A Webster
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Temporal resolution of single-photon responses in primate rod photoreceptors and limits imposed by cellular noise.

Authors:  Greg D Field; Valerie Uzzell; E J Chichilnisky; Fred Rieke
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Ventral aspect of the visual form pathway is not critical for the perception of biological motion.

Authors:  Sharon Gilaie-Dotan; Ayse Pinar Saygin; Lauren J Lorenzi; Geraint Rees; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Age differences in virtual environment and real world path integration.

Authors:  Diane E Adamo; Emily M Briceño; Joseph A Sindone; Neil B Alexander; Scott D Moffat
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 5.750

5.  Spared ability to perceive direction of locomotor heading and scene-relative object movement despite inability to perceive relative motion.

Authors:  Lucia Maria Vaina; Ferdinando Buonanno; Simon K Rushton
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2014-09-03

6.  Stroboscopic vision and sustained attention during coincidence-anticipation.

Authors:  Rafael Ballester; Florentino Huertas; Makoto Uji; Simon J Bennett
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Local Dot Motion, Not Global Configuration, Determines Dogs' Preference for Point-Light Displays.

Authors:  Carla J Eatherington; Lieta Marinelli; Miina Lõoke; Luca Battaglini; Paolo Mongillo
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  The Development and Aging of the Magnocellular and Parvocellular Visual Pathways as Indicated by VEP Recordings between 5 and 84 Years of Age.

Authors:  György Benedek; Gyöngyi Horváth; Szabolcs Kéri; Gábor Braunitzer; Márta Janáky
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2016-10-17
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.