BACKGROUND: Sputum is an easily accessible diagnostic material for lung cancer early detection by cytologic and molecular genetic analysis of exfoliated airway epithelial cells. However, the use of sputum is limited by its cellular heterogeneity, which includes >95% macrophages and neutrophils and only about 1% bronchial epithelial cells. We propose to obtain concentrated and purified bronchial epithelial cells to improve early detection of lung cancer in sputum samples. METHODS: Sputum was collected from patients with stage I nonsmall-cell lung cancer, cancer-free smokers, and healthy nonsmokers. Magnetic-assisted cell sorting (MACS) with anti-CD14 and anti-CD16 antibody beads were used to enrich bronchial epithelial cells by depleting macrophages and neutrophils from sputum. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis for detection of FHIT deletion and cytology were evaluated in the enriched specimens. RESULTS: The bronchial epithelial cells were concentrated to 40% purity from 1.1% of the starting population, yielding an average of 36-fold enrichment and at least 2.3 x 10(5) cells per sample. Detecting FHIT deletions for lung cancer diagnosis produced 58% sensitivity in the enriched sputum, whereas there was 42% sensitivity in the unenriched samples (P = .02). Cytologic examination of the enriched sputum resulted in 53% sensitivity, as compared with 39% sensitivity in unenriched sputum (P = .03). Furthermore, only 2 cytocentrifuge slides of the unenriched sputum were needed for the analyses, as compared with up to 10 cytocentrifuge slides required from the unprocessed specimens. CONCLUSIONS: The enrichment of bronchial epithelial cells could improve the diagnostic value of sputum and the efficiency of genetic and cytologic analysis of lung cancer. (c) 2008 American Cancer Society.
BACKGROUND: Sputum is an easily accessible diagnostic material for lung cancer early detection by cytologic and molecular genetic analysis of exfoliated airway epithelial cells. However, the use of sputum is limited by its cellular heterogeneity, which includes >95% macrophages and neutrophils and only about 1% bronchial epithelial cells. We propose to obtain concentrated and purified bronchial epithelial cells to improve early detection of lung cancer in sputum samples. METHODS: Sputum was collected from patients with stage I nonsmall-cell lung cancer, cancer-free smokers, and healthy nonsmokers. Magnetic-assisted cell sorting (MACS) with anti-CD14 and anti-CD16 antibody beads were used to enrich bronchial epithelial cells by depleting macrophages and neutrophils from sputum. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis for detection of FHIT deletion and cytology were evaluated in the enriched specimens. RESULTS: The bronchial epithelial cells were concentrated to 40% purity from 1.1% of the starting population, yielding an average of 36-fold enrichment and at least 2.3 x 10(5) cells per sample. Detecting FHIT deletions for lung cancer diagnosis produced 58% sensitivity in the enriched sputum, whereas there was 42% sensitivity in the unenriched samples (P = .02). Cytologic examination of the enriched sputum resulted in 53% sensitivity, as compared with 39% sensitivity in unenriched sputum (P = .03). Furthermore, only 2 cytocentrifuge slides of the unenriched sputum were needed for the analyses, as compared with up to 10 cytocentrifuge slides required from the unprocessed specimens. CONCLUSIONS: The enrichment of bronchial epithelial cells could improve the diagnostic value of sputum and the efficiency of genetic and cytologic analysis of lung cancer. (c) 2008 American Cancer Society.
Authors: Petra S Kraemer; Carissa A Sanchez; Gary E Goodman; James Jett; Peter S Rabinovitch; Brian J Reid Journal: Cytometry A Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 4.355
Authors: Ruiyun Li; Nevins W Todd; Qi Qiu; Tao Fan; Richard Y Zhao; William H Rodgers; Hong-Bin Fang; Ruth L Katz; Sanford A Stass; Feng Jiang Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2007-01-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: E Pizzichini; M M Pizzichini; A Efthimiadis; S Evans; M M Morris; D Squillace; G J Gleich; J Dolovich; F E Hargreave Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 1996-08 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Steven A Ahrendt; Yingchuan Hu; Martin Buta; Michael P McDermott; Nicole Benoit; Stephen C Yang; Li Wu; David Sidransky Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2003-07-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Marileila Varella-Garcia; Aline P Schulte; Holly J Wolf; William J Feser; Chan Zeng; Sarah Braudrick; Xiang Yin; Fred R Hirsch; Timothy C Kennedy; Robert L Keith; Anna E Barón; Steven A Belinsky; York E Miller; Tim Byers; Wilbur A Franklin Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2010-03-23
Authors: David G Menter; Sherri L Patterson; Craig D Logsdon; Scott Kopetz; Anil K Sood; Ernest T Hawk Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2014-07-24
Authors: Lingxiao Xing; Jian Su; Maria A Guarnera; Howard Zhang; Ling Cai; Rixin Zhou; Sanford A Stass; Feng Jiang Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2015-01-15 Impact factor: 12.531