BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Gradient recalled echo MRI (GRE) has been shown to be as accurate as CT for the detection of acute intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). However, because of the differences in the signal parameter being detected, apparent hemorrhage size is expected to vary by imaging modality, with GRE providing larger volumes attributable to susceptibility effects. METHODS: Image data from patients participating in 3 ICH studies were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with acute ICH were included if (1) concurrent MRI and CT were performed within 72 hours of symptom onset, and (2) each modality was performed within 240 minutes of each other. ICH volumes were calculated using a semiautomated image analysis program. The least squares method was used to develop a conversion equation based on a linear regression of GRE volume on CT volume. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients met inclusion criteria. MRI was performed first in 18, CT first in 18. Mean hemorrhage volume was 25.2 cc (range 0.1 to 83.9 cc) on CT and 32.7 cc (range 0.1 to 98.7 cc) measured on GRE. A linear relationship defined by CT Volume=GRE Volume*0.8 (Spearman's correlation coefficient=0.992, P<0.001) was derived. CONCLUSIONS: Acute ICH volumes as measured on GRE pulse sequences are consistently larger than CT volumes. A simple mathematical conversion model has been developed: CT volume=0.8*GRE volume. This formula can be used in studies using both imaging modalities, across different studies, or to track ICH growth over time independent of imaging modality in an individual patient.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Gradient recalled echo MRI (GRE) has been shown to be as accurate as CT for the detection of acute intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). However, because of the differences in the signal parameter being detected, apparent hemorrhage size is expected to vary by imaging modality, with GRE providing larger volumes attributable to susceptibility effects. METHODS: Image data from patients participating in 3 ICH studies were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with acute ICH were included if (1) concurrent MRI and CT were performed within 72 hours of symptom onset, and (2) each modality was performed within 240 minutes of each other. ICH volumes were calculated using a semiautomated image analysis program. The least squares method was used to develop a conversion equation based on a linear regression of GRE volume on CT volume. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients met inclusion criteria. MRI was performed first in 18, CT first in 18. Mean hemorrhage volume was 25.2 cc (range 0.1 to 83.9 cc) on CT and 32.7 cc (range 0.1 to 98.7 cc) measured on GRE. A linear relationship defined by CT Volume=GRE Volume*0.8 (Spearman's correlation coefficient=0.992, P<0.001) was derived. CONCLUSIONS: Acute ICH volumes as measured on GRE pulse sequences are consistently larger than CT volumes. A simple mathematical conversion model has been developed: CT volume=0.8*GRE volume. This formula can be used in studies using both imaging modalities, across different studies, or to track ICH growth over time independent of imaging modality in an individual patient.
Authors: S M Davis; J Broderick; M Hennerici; N C Brun; M N Diringer; S A Mayer; K Begtrup; T Steiner Journal: Neurology Date: 2006-04-25 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Julio A Chalela; Chelsea S Kidwell; Lauren M Nentwich; Marie Luby; John A Butman; Andrew M Demchuk; Michael D Hill; Nicholas Patronas; Lawrence Latour; Steven Warach Journal: Lancet Date: 2007-01-27 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Stephan A Mayer; Nikolai C Brun; Kamilla Begtrup; Joseph Broderick; Stephen Davis; Michael N Diringer; Brett E Skolnick; Thorsten Steiner Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-02-24 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Chelsea S Kidwell; Julio A Chalela; Jeffrey L Saver; Sidney Starkman; Michael D Hill; Andrew M Demchuk; John A Butman; Nicholas Patronas; Jeffry R Alger; Lawrence L Latour; Marie L Luby; Alison E Baird; Megan C Leary; Margaret Tremwel; Bruce Ovbiagele; Andre Fredieu; Shuichi Suzuki; J Pablo Villablanca; Stephen Davis; Billy Dunn; Jason W Todd; Mustapha A Ezzeddine; Joseph Haymore; John K Lynch; Lisa Davis; Steven Warach Journal: JAMA Date: 2004-10-20 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: J B Fiebach; P D Schellinger; O Jansen; M Meyer; P Wilde; J Bender; P Schramm; E Jüttler; J Oehler; M Hartmann; S Hähnel; M Knauth; W Hacke; K Sartor Journal: Stroke Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Muhammad E Haque; Refaat E Gabr; Xiurong Zhao; Khader M Hasan; Andrew Valenzuela; Ponnada A Narayana; Shun-Ming Ting; Guanghua Sun; Sean I Savitz; Jaroslaw Aronowski Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2018-01-02 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Steven M Greenberg; R N Kaveer Nandigam; Pilar Delgado; Rebecca A Betensky; Jonathan Rosand; Anand Viswanathan; Matthew P Frosch; Eric E Smith Journal: Stroke Date: 2009-05-14 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Darin B Zahuranec; Jeffrey J Wing; Dorothy F Edwards; Ravi S Menon; Stephen J Fernandez; Richard E Burgess; Ian A Sobotka; Laura German; Anna J Trouth; Nawar M Shara; M Chris Gibbons; Bernadette Boden-Albala; Chelsea S Kidwell Journal: Stroke Date: 2012-08-16 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Lauren A Beslow; Rebecca N Ichord; Melissa C Gindville; Jonathan T Kleinman; Rachel A Bastian; Sabrina E Smith; Daniel J Licht; Argye E Hillis; Lori C Jordan Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Anna L Romanova; Alexander J Nemeth; Michael D Berman; James C Guth; Eric M Liotta; Andrew M Naidech; Matthew B Maas Journal: J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis Date: 2014-07-30 Impact factor: 2.136
Authors: Kishor Karki; Robert A Knight; Yuxia Han; Dongmei Yang; Jianfeng Zhang; Karyn A Ledbetter; Michael Chopp; Donald M Seyfried Journal: Stroke Date: 2009-07-30 Impact factor: 7.914