Literature DB >> 9264276

Mammography diffusion and trends in late-stage breast cancer: evaluating outcomes in a population.

S H Taplin1, M T Mandelson, C Anderman, E White, R S Thompson, D Timlin, E H Wagner.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess mammography diffusion in a population offered an organized breast cancer screening program, using intervals of 1-3 years, and to evaluate its effect on the late-stage cancer (tumors > or = 3 cm2) rates compared to rates in the surrounding community. We measured "ever-use" of mammography (1986-1992) among women enrollees of a consumer-controlled health care organization (n > or = 60,000/year; ages > or = 40), Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound (GHC). Among these same women and the surrounding community (n = > or = 745,000/year), we measured late-stage cancer rates. Using unconditional logistic regression, we compared annual rates of ever-use among GHC women ages 40-49 and > or = 50 (1986-1992) and late-stage breast cancer (1983/84-1991/92) among all women. Among all GHC women ages 40 to 49, and 50 years of age and older, 67.4 and 82.8%, respectively, ever-used mammography by 1992. By 1992, approximately one-third of the mammograms among GHC women occurred in each of the three previous years. The rate of late-stage tumors declined significantly in the GHC and non-GHC populations among women 50 years of age and older (P < 0.001) but not among women ages 40 to 49. In conclusion, implementing a system of automated reminders was not sufficient to maximize mammography use in a population. Reductions in late-stage disease occurred among women ages > or = 50, even when regular" was not synonymous with "annual."

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9264276

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  17 in total

1.  Geographic socioeconomic status, race, and advanced-stage breast cancer in New York City.

Authors:  Sharon Stein Merkin; Lori Stevenson; Neil Powe
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Radiologist uncertainty and the interpretation of screening.

Authors:  Patricia A Carney; Joann G Elmore; Linn A Abraham; Martha S Gerrity; R Edward Hendrick; Stephen H Taplin; William E Barlow; Gary R Cutter; Steven P Poplack; Carl J D'Orsi
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  Community-based mammography practice: services, charges, and interpretation methods.

Authors:  R Edward Hendrick; Gary R Cutter; Eric A Berns; Connie Nakano; Joseph Egger; Patricia A Carney; Linn Abraham; Stephen H Taplin; Carl J D'Orsi; William Barlow; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Current realities of delivering mammography services in the community: do challenges with staffing and scheduling exist?

Authors:  Carl D'Orsi; Shin-Ping Tu; Connie Nakano; Patricia A Carney; Linn A Abraham; Stephen H Taplin; R Edward Hendrick; Gary R Cutter; Eric Berns; William E Barlow; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-03-29       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Examining accuracy of screening mammography using an event order model.

Authors:  Prashni Paliwal; Alan E Gelfand; Linn Abraham; William Barlow; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2006-01-30       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Does litigation influence medical practice? The influence of community radiologists' medical malpractice perceptions and experience on screening mammography.

Authors:  Joann G Elmore; Stephen H Taplin; William E Barlow; Gary R Cutter; Carl J D'Orsi; R Edward Hendrick; Linn A Abraham; Jessica S Fosse; Patricia A Carney
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  The influence of statin use on breast density.

Authors:  Denise M Boudreau; Carolyn M Rutter; Diana S M Buist
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Bias associated with self-report of prior screening mammography.

Authors:  Kathleen A Cronin; Diana L Miglioretti; Martin Krapcho; Binbing Yu; Berta M Geller; Patricia A Carney; Tracy Onega; Eric J Feuer; Nancy Breen; Rachel Ballard-Barbash
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Body mass index, tumor characteristics, and prognosis following diagnosis of early-stage breast cancer in a mammographically screened population.

Authors:  Aruna Kamineni; Melissa L Anderson; Emily White; Stephen H Taplin; Peggy Porter; Rachel Ballard-Barbash; Kathleen Malone; Diana S M Buist
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 2.506

10.  Fertility drug use and mammographic breast density in a mammography screening cohort of premenopausal women.

Authors:  Brian L Sprague; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Mary Beth Terry; Hazel B Nichols; Andrew J Bersch; Diana S M Buist
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.