Literature DB >> 18479404

Comparison of web-based versus paper-and-pencil self-administered questionnaire: effects on health indicators in Dutch adolescents.

Petra M Van De Looij-Jansen1, Erik Jan De Wilde.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to investigate differences in responses related to (mental) health and behavior between two methods of data collection: web-based (web) and paper-and-pencil (p&p). STUDY
DESIGN: Within each participating school all third-grade classes (mainly 14-15-year-old pupils) were randomly assigned to either the Internet condition (n=271) or the paper-and-pencil condition (n=261). PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: Significant but small differences were found for the strengths and difficulties subscales "emotional symptoms" (p&p>web) and "prosocial behavior" (p&p>web), and carrying a weapon (web>p&p). Perceived level of privacy and confidentiality did not differ between the two modes.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that in a controlled school setting, web-based administration of health indicators yields almost the same results as paper-and-pencil administration. To generalize these findings, we recommend repeated studies in other populations and settings. © Health Research and Educational Trust.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18479404      PMCID: PMC2653887          DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00860.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  15 in total

Review 1.  The application and impact of computer-generated personalized nutrition education: a review of the literature.

Authors:  J Brug; M Campbell; P van Assema
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  1999-02

Review 2.  Assessment of factors affecting the validity of self-reported health-risk behavior among adolescents: evidence from the scientific literature.

Authors:  Nancy D Brener; John O G Billy; William R Grady
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.012

3.  Dutch version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ).

Authors:  Brigit M van Widenfelt; Arnold W Goedhart; Philip D A Treffers; Robert Goodman
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.785

4.  Internet-administered adolescent health questionnaires compared with a paper version in a randomized study.

Authors:  Resiti T Mangunkusumo; Peter W Moorman; Annelette E Van Den Berg-de Ruiter; Johan Van Der Lei; Harry J De Koning; Hein Raat
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.012

5.  Computer-assisted detection and intervention in adolescent high-risk health behaviors.

Authors:  D M Paperny; J Y Aono; R M Lehman; S L Hammar; J Risser
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 4.406

6.  Adolescent sexual behavior, drug use, and violence: increased reporting with computer survey technology.

Authors:  C F Turner; L Ku; S M Rogers; L D Lindberg; J H Pleck; F L Sonenstein
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-05-08       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Comparability of a computer-assisted versus written method for collecting health behavior information from adolescent patients.

Authors:  P M Webb; G D Zimet; J D Fortenberry; M J Blythe
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 5.012

8.  Reliability and validity of the child health questionnaire-child form (CHQ-CF87) in a Dutch adolescent population.

Authors:  H Raat; J M Landgraf; G J Bonsel; R J B J Gemke; M L Essink-Bot
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Comparison of a computer-administered and paper-and-pencil-administered questionnaire on health and lifestyle behaviors.

Authors:  Carine A Vereecken; Lea Maes
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.012

10.  Effects of question order on estimates of the prevalence of attempted weight loss.

Authors:  M K Serdula; A H Mokdad; E R Pamuk; D F Williamson; T Byers
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1995-07-01       Impact factor: 4.897

View more
  21 in total

1.  A latent transition analysis of the longitudinal stability of dual-factor mental health in adolescence.

Authors:  Stephanie A Moore; Erin Dowdy; Karen Nylund-Gibson; Michael J Furlong
Journal:  J Sch Psychol       Date:  2019-03-15

2.  Using Opinions and Knowledge to Identify Natural Groups of Gambling Employees.

Authors:  Heather M Gray; Matthew A Tom; Debi A LaPlante; Howard J Shaffer
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2015-12

3.  Middle and High School Student Perspectives on Digitally-Delivered Mental Health Assessments and Measurement Feedback Systems.

Authors:  Ashley M Mayworm; Brynn M Kelly; Mylien T Duong; Aaron R Lyon
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2020-07

4.  Are consumers of Internet health information "cyberchondriacs"? Characteristics of 24,965 users of a depression screening site.

Authors:  Yan Leykin; Ricardo F Muñoz; Omar Contreras
Journal:  Depress Anxiety       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 6.505

5.  The Post-Deployment Mental Health (PDMH) study and repository: A multi-site study of US Afghanistan and Iraq era veterans.

Authors:  Mira Brancu; H Ryan Wagner; Rajendra A Morey; Jean C Beckham; Patrick S Calhoun; Larry A Tupler; Christine E Marx; Katherine H Taber; Robin A Hurley; Jared Rowland; Scott D McDonald; Jeffrey M Hoerle; Scott D Moore; Harold S Kudler; Richard D Weiner; John A Fairbank
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 4.035

6.  Perception of Choking Injury Risk Among Healthcare Students.

Authors:  Carolina Fano; Giulia Lorenzoni; Danila Azzolina; Anna Giuliani; Megan French; Sara Campagna; Paola Berchialla; Dario Gregori
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2019-10

7.  The relationship between sensory sensitivity and autistic traits in the general population.

Authors:  Ashley E Robertson; David R Simmons
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2013-04

8.  Negligible Effects of the Survey Modes for Patient-Reported Outcomes: A Report From the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study.

Authors:  Jin-Ah Sim; Geehong Hyun; Todd M Gibson; Yutaka Yasui; Wendy Leisenring; Melissa M Hudson; Leslie L Robison; Gregory T Armstrong; Kevin R Krull; I-Chan Huang
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2020-01

9.  Characteristics of a Favorable Weight Status Change From Adolescence to Young Adulthood.

Authors:  Allison W Watts; Katie A Loth; Colleen Peterson; Kerri N Boutelle; Dianne Neumark-Sztainer
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2015-11-07       Impact factor: 5.012

10.  Interformat Reliability of Web-Based Parent-Rated Questionnaires for Assessing Neurodevelopmental Disorders Among Preschoolers: Cross-sectional Community Study.

Authors:  Masanori Tanaka; Manabu Saito; Michio Takahashi; Masaki Adachi; Kazuhiko Nakamura
Journal:  JMIR Pediatr Parent       Date:  2021-02-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.