Literature DB >> 7785675

Effects of question order on estimates of the prevalence of attempted weight loss.

M K Serdula1, A H Mokdad, E R Pamuk, D F Williamson, T Byers.   

Abstract

Although numerous surveys have been conducted to estimate the prevalence of attempted weight loss, little information is available on the possible effects of question order on the prevalence estimates. The authors examined data collected from 231,852 respondents to surveys conducted in the District of Columbia and 20 states that participated in the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System between 1985 and 1992. In surveys conducted from 1985 to 1988, respondents (n = 117,827) were first asked their body weight and then were asked if they were trying to lose weight; 48% of the women and 29% of the men reported that they were trying to lose weight. In 1989, 1991, and 1992 (no questions about weight control were asked in 1990), the order of the questions was reversed so that respondents (n = 114,025) were asked whether they were trying to lose weight before they were asked to report their weight; 41% of the women and 26% of the men reported that they were trying to lose weight. The authors conclude that survey respondents, especially women, may be more likely to report that they are trying to lose weight when questions about weight control practices immediately follow questions on current weight. This apparent effect of question order points to the need for caution in comparing prevalence estimates across surveys in which the questions are not asked in a similar order, even when the questions are worded identically.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7785675     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117546

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  5 in total

1.  Order effects in the assessment of quality of life in cancer patients.

Authors:  Yin-Bun Cheung; Lea-Choung Wong; Miah-Hiang Tay; Chee-Keong Toh; Wen-Hsin Koo; Richard Epstein; Cynthia Goh
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Comparison of web-based versus paper-and-pencil self-administered questionnaire: effects on health indicators in Dutch adolescents.

Authors:  Petra M Van De Looij-Jansen; Erik Jan De Wilde
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  A randomized validation study comparing embedded versus extracted FACT Head and Neck Symptom Index scores.

Authors:  Susan Yount; Marcy List; Hongyan Du; Kathleen Yost; Rita Bode; Bruce Brockstein; Athanassios Argiris; Everett Vokes; Ezra E W Cohen; Bruce Campbell; Veronica Valenzuela; Jacquelyn George; Robyn Egan; Jessica Chen; David Meddis; David Cella
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-10-06       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Order effects: a randomised study of three major cancer-specific quality of life instruments.

Authors:  Yin-Bun Cheung; Celestine Lim; Cynthia Goh; Julian Thumboo; Joseph Wee
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2005-05-31       Impact factor: 3.186

Review 5.  Prevalence of personal weight control attempts in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  I Santos; F F Sniehotta; M M Marques; E V Carraça; P J Teixeira
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 9.213

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.