Literature DB >> 18476195

The Potential Misuse of DNA Probe for the Detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydía trachomatis When Used for Test of Cure.

G R Monif1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  1997        PMID： 18476195      PMCID： PMC2364591          DOI： 10.1155/S1064744997000720

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol        ISSN： 1064-7449


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  Comparison of DNA probe, monoclonal antibody enzyme immunoassay, and cell culture for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  W LeBar; B Herschman; C Jemal; J Pierzchala
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Comparison of three techniques for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens from asymptomatic women.

Authors:  J Lefebvre; H Laperrière; H Rousseau; R Massé
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Comparison of the Syva MicroTrak enzyme immunoassay and Gen-Probe PACE 2 with cell culture for diagnosis of cervical Chlamydia trachomatis infection in a high-prevalence female population.

Authors:  L M Clarke; M F Sierra; B J Daidone; N Lopez; J M Covino; W M McCormack
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis endocervical infection in asymptomatic and symptomatic women: comparison of deoxyribonucleic acid probe test with tissue culture.

Authors:  L I Yang; E S Panke; P A Leist; R J Fry; R F Lee
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Comparison of the Clearview Chlamydia, the PACE 2 assay, and culture for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis from cervical specimens in a low-prevalence population.

Authors:  J Blanding; L Hirsch; N Stranton; T Wright; S Aarnaes; L de la Maza; E M Peterson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 5.948
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.