Literature DB >> 18471973

Colocalization of sensors is sufficient to activate the DNA damage checkpoint in the absence of damage.

Carla Yaneth Bonilla1, Justine Amy Melo, David Paul Toczyski.   

Abstract

Previous work on the DNA damage checkpoint in Saccharomyces cerevisiae has shown that two complexes independently sense DNA lesions: the kinase Mec1-Ddc2 and the PCNA-like 9-1-1 complex. To test whether colocalization of these components is sufficient for checkpoint activation, we fused these checkpoint proteins to the LacI repressor and artificially colocalized these fusions by expressing them in cells harboring Lac operator arrays. We observed Rad53 and Rad9 phosphorylation, Sml1 degradation, and metaphase delay, demonstrating that colocalization of these sensors is sufficient to activate the checkpoint in the absence of DNA damage. Our tethering system allowed us to establish that CDK functions in the checkpoint pathway downstream of damage processing and checkpoint protein recruitment. This CDK dependence is likely, at least in part, through Rad9, since mutation of CDK consensus sites compromised its checkpoint function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18471973      PMCID: PMC2879338          DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.03.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell        ISSN: 1097-2765            Impact factor:   17.970


  58 in total

1.  A novel Rad24 checkpoint protein complex closely related to replication factor C.

Authors:  C M Green; H Erdjument-Bromage; P Tempst; N F Lowndes
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2000-01-13       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Histone modification-dependent and -independent pathways for recruitment of checkpoint protein Crb2 to double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Li-Lin Du; Toru M Nakamura; Paul Russell
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  The Rad9-Hus1-Rad1 checkpoint clamp regulates interaction of TopBP1 with ATR.

Authors:  Joon Lee; Akiko Kumagai; William G Dunphy
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2007-07-18       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Structural basis for the methylation state-specific recognition of histone H4-K20 by 53BP1 and Crb2 in DNA repair.

Authors:  Maria Victoria Botuyan; Joseph Lee; Irene M Ward; Ja-Eun Kim; James R Thompson; Junjie Chen; Georges Mer
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2006-12-29       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  The checkpoint protein Ddc2, functionally related to S. pombe Rad26, interacts with Mec1 and is regulated by Mec1-dependent phosphorylation in budding yeast.

Authors:  V Paciotti; M Clerici; G Lucchini; M P Longhese
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-08-15       Impact factor: 11.361

6.  The checkpoint clamp activates Mec1 kinase during initiation of the DNA damage checkpoint.

Authors:  Jerzy Majka; Anita Niedziela-Majka; Peter M J Burgers
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2006-12-28       Impact factor: 17.970

7.  Requirement of the Mre11 complex and exonuclease 1 for activation of the Mec1 signaling pathway.

Authors:  Daisuke Nakada; Yukinori Hirano; Katsunori Sugimoto
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  The Rad9-Hus1-Rad1 (9-1-1) clamp activates checkpoint signaling via TopBP1.

Authors:  Sinny Delacroix; Jill M Wagner; Masahiko Kobayashi; Ken-ichi Yamamoto; Larry M Karnitz
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 11.361

9.  The DNA damage checkpoint response requires histone H2B ubiquitination by Rad6-Bre1 and H3 methylation by Dot1.

Authors:  Michele Giannattasio; Federico Lazzaro; Paolo Plevani; Marco Muzi-Falconi
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2005-01-04       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Rad9 BRCT domain interaction with phosphorylated H2AX regulates the G1 checkpoint in budding yeast.

Authors:  Andrew Hammet; Christine Magill; Jörg Heierhorst; Stephen P Jackson
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 8.807

View more
  83 in total

1.  The unstructured C-terminal tail of yeast Dpb11 (human TopBP1) protein is dispensable for DNA replication and the S phase checkpoint but required for the G2/M checkpoint.

Authors:  Vasundhara M Navadgi-Patil; Sandeep Kumar; Peter M Burgers
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  The Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD9, RAD17 and RAD24 genes are required for suppression of mutagenic post-replicative repair during chronic DNA damage.

Authors:  Akiko Murakami-Sekimata; Dongqing Huang; Brian D Piening; Chaitanya Bangur; Amanda G Paulovich
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2010-05-15

Review 3.  ATR: an essential regulator of genome integrity.

Authors:  Karlene A Cimprich; David Cortez
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 94.444

4.  Rad53 downregulates mitotic gene transcription by inhibiting the transcriptional activator Ndd1.

Authors:  Ellen R Edenberg; Ajay Vashisht; Jennifer A Benanti; James Wohlschlegel; David P Toczyski
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  The unstructured C-terminal tail of the 9-1-1 clamp subunit Ddc1 activates Mec1/ATR via two distinct mechanisms.

Authors:  Vasundhara M Navadgi-Patil; Peter M Burgers
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 17.970

6.  CDC5 inhibits the hyperphosphorylation of the checkpoint kinase Rad53, leading to checkpoint adaptation.

Authors:  Genevieve M Vidanes; Frédéric D Sweeney; Sarah Galicia; Stephanie Cheung; John P Doyle; Daniel Durocher; David P Toczyski
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 8.029

7.  Dynamics of Rad9 chromatin binding and checkpoint function are mediated by its dimerization and are cell cycle-regulated by CDK1 activity.

Authors:  Magda Granata; Federico Lazzaro; Daniele Novarina; Davide Panigada; Fabio Puddu; Carla Manuela Abreu; Ramesh Kumar; Muriel Grenon; Noel F Lowndes; Paolo Plevani; Marco Muzi-Falconi
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  Cdc28/Cdk1 positively and negatively affects genome stability in S. cerevisiae.

Authors:  Jorrit M Enserink; Hans Hombauer; Meng-Er Huang; Richard D Kolodner
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2009-04-27       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  Chk1 C-terminal regulatory phosphorylation mediates checkpoint activation by de-repression of Chk1 catalytic activity.

Authors:  M Walker; E J Black; V Oehler; D A Gillespie; M T Scott
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 9.867

10.  A truncated DNA-damage-signaling response is activated after DSB formation in the G1 phase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Ryan Janke; Kristina Herzberg; Michael Rolfsmeier; Jordan Mar; Vladimir I Bashkirov; Edwin Haghnazari; Greg Cantin; John R Yates; Wolf-Dietrich Heyer
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.