Literature DB >> 20505802

Towards a noninvasive anatomical and functional diagnostic work-up of patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

J G J Groothuis1, A M Beek, M R Meijerink, S L Brinckman, M B M Hofman, A C van Rossum.   

Abstract

Combining multidetector computed tomography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging provides the clinician a strategy to comprehensively evaluate coronary morphology and function noninvasively. In the MARCC trial (Magnetic Resonance and CT in suspected CAD) a new noninvasive diagnostic work-up for patients with suspected coronary artery disease will be developed, involving the sequential use of both imaging techniques. (Neth Heart J 2010;18:270-3.).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coronary Angiography; Coronary Artery Disease; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

Year:  2010        PMID： 20505802      PMCID： PMC2871749          DOI： 10.1007/BF03091775

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neth Heart J        ISSN： 1568-5888            Impact factor:   2.380


  20 in total

1.  Clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR): Consensus Panel report.

Authors:  Dudley J Pennell; Udo P Sechtem; Charles B Higgins; Warren J Manning; Gerald M Pohost; Frank E Rademakers; Albert C van Rossum; Leslee J Shaw; E Kent Yucel
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.364

2.  Comparison of magnetic resonance perfusion imaging versus invasive fractional flow reserve for assessment of the hemodynamic significance of epicardial coronary artery stenosis.

Authors:  Harald P Kühl; Marcus Katoh; Christiane Buhr; Gabriele A Krombach; Rainer Hoffmann; Tienush Rassaf; Mirja Neizel; Arno Buecker; Malte Kelm
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2007-02-26       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 3.  Delayed contrast enhancement magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of cardiac disease.

Authors:  Constantin B Marcu; Robin Nijveldt; Aernout M Beek; Albert C Van Rossum
Journal:  Heart Lung Circ       Date:  2007-02-21       Impact factor: 2.975

Review 4.  64-multislice detector computed tomography coronary angiography as potential alternative to conventional coronary angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jawdat Abdulla; Steen Z Abildstrom; Ole Gotzsche; Erik Christensen; Lars Kober; Christian Torp-Pedersen
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2007-11-02       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  Low to intermediate probability of coronary artery disease: comparison of coronary CT angiography with first-pass MR myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Jan G J Groothuis; Aernout M Beek; Stijn L Brinckman; Martijn R Meijerink; Simon C Koestner; Robin Nijveldt; Marco J W Götte; Mark B M Hofman; Cornelis van Kuijk; Albert C van Rossum
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Regional myocardial perfusion reserve determined using myocardial perfusion magnetic resonance imaging showed a direct correlation with coronary flow velocity reserve by Doppler flow wire.

Authors:  Tairo Kurita; Hajime Sakuma; Katsuya Onishi; Masaki Ishida; Kakuya Kitagawa; Takashi Yamanaka; Takashi Tanigawa; Tetsuya Kitamura; Kan Takeda; Masaaki Ito
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 29.983

7.  Comprehensive assessment of coronary artery stenoses: computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angiography and correlation with fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina.

Authors:  W Bob Meijboom; Carlos A G Van Mieghem; Niels van Pelt; Annick Weustink; Francesca Pugliese; Nico R Mollet; Eric Boersma; Eveline Regar; Robert J van Geuns; Peter J de Jaegere; Patrick W Serruys; Gabriel P Krestin; Pim J de Feyter
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-08-19       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Multi-slice computed tomography coronary angiography for ruling out suspected coronary artery disease: what is the prevalence of a normal study in a general clinical population?

Authors:  Maureen M Henneman; Joanne D Schuijf; Jacob M van Werkhoven; Gabija Pundziute; Ernst E van der Wall; J Wouter Jukema; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2008-06-23       Impact factor: 29.983

9.  Prognostic value of normal adenosine-stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Guenter Pilz; Andrea Jeske; Markus Klos; Eman Ali; Berthold Hoefling; Roland Scheck; Peter Bernhardt
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Guidelines on the management of stable angina pectoris: executive summary: The Task Force on the Management of Stable Angina Pectoris of the European Society of Cardiology.

Authors:  Kim Fox; Maria Angeles Alonso Garcia; Diego Ardissino; Pawel Buszman; Paolo G Camici; Filippo Crea; Caroline Daly; Guy De Backer; Paul Hjemdahl; José Lopez-Sendon; Jean Marco; João Morais; John Pepper; Udo Sechtem; Maarten Simoons; Kristian Thygesen; Silvia G Priori; Jean-Jacques Blanc; Andrzej Budaj; John Camm; Veronica Dean; Jaap Deckers; Kenneth Dickstein; John Lekakis; Keith McGregor; Marco Metra; João Morais; Ady Osterspey; Juan Tamargo; José L Zamorano
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 29.983
View more
  11 in total

1.  The NHJ 2012 in retrospect: which articles are cited most?

Authors:  E E van der Wall
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.380

2.  Ablation for atrial fibrillation: CT overlay or standard electroanatomical mapping?

Authors:  E E van der Wall
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.380

3.  Myocardial perfusion imaging in coronary artery disease: SPECT, PET or CMR?

Authors:  E E van der Wall
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.380

4.  Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging; gatekeeper in suspected CAD?

Authors:  E E van der Wall; H M Siebelink; J J Bax; M J Schalij
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Functional analysis by 64-slice CT scanning: prediction of left ventricular dysfunction together with reduction in radiation exposure?

Authors:  E E van der Wall; F R de Graaf; J E van Velzen; J W Jukema; J D Schuijf; J J Bax
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-12-18       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  100 kV versus 120 kV: effective reduction in radiation dose?

Authors:  E E van der Wall; J W Jukema; J D Schuijf; J J Bax
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  320-row CT: does beat-to-beat motion of the coronary arteries affect image quality?

Authors:  E E van der Wall; F R de Graaf; J E van Velzen; J W Jukema; J J Bax; J D Schuijf
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-01-30       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  Reduction of radiation dose using 80 kV tube voltage: a feasible strategy?

Authors:  E E van der Wall; J E van Velzen; F R de Graaf; J W Jukema
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-03-19       Impact factor: 2.357

9.  320-row CT scanning: reduction in tube current parallels reduction in radiation exposure?

Authors:  E E van der Wall; J E van Velzen; F R de Graaf; J W Jukema; J D Schuijf; J J Bax
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 2.357

10.  Does heart rate influence CMR image quality of the coronary vessel wall?

Authors:  E E van der Wall; E J S Kröner; H M Siebelink; A J Scholte; M J Schalij
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 2.357
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.