Literature DB >> 18467005

Estimating everyday portion size using a 'method of constant stimuli': in a student sample, portion size is predicted by gender, dietary behaviour, and hunger, but not BMI.

Jeffrey M Brunstrom1, Peter J Rogers, Emmanuel M Pothos, Raff Calitri, Katy Tapper.   

Abstract

This paper (i) explores the proposition that body weight is associated with large portion sizes and (ii) introduces a new technique for measuring everyday portion size. In our paradigm, the participant is shown a picture of a food portion and is asked to indicate whether it is larger or smaller than their usual portion. After responding to a range of different portions an estimate of everyday portion size is calculated using probit analysis. Importantly, this estimate is likely to be robust because it is based on many responses. First-year undergraduate students (N=151) completed our procedure for 12 commonly consumed foods. As expected, portion sizes were predicted by gender and by a measure of dieting and dietary restraint. Furthermore, consistent with reports of hungry supermarket shoppers, portion-size estimates tended to be higher in hungry individuals. However, we found no evidence for a relationship between BMI and portion size in any of the test foods. We consider reasons why this finding should be anticipated. In particular, we suggest that the difference in total energy expenditure of individuals with a higher and lower BMI is too small to be detected as a concomitant difference in portion size (at least in our sample).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18467005     DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2008.03.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  19 in total

1.  A sipometer for measuring motivation to consume and reward value of foods and beverages in humans: Description and proof of principle.

Authors:  P S Hogenkamp; A Shechter; M-P St-Onge; A Sclafani; H R Kissileff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2017-01-13

2.  Reliability and responsiveness of virtual portion size creation tasks: Influences of context, foods, and a bariatric surgical procedure.

Authors:  Jeon D Hamm; Jany Dotel; Shoran Tamura; Ari Shechter; Musya Herzog; Jeffrey M Brunstrom; Jeanine Albu; F Xavier Pi-Sunyer; Blandine Laferrère; Harry R Kissileff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2020-06-06

3.  Brain response to food cues varying in portion size is associated with individual differences in the portion size effect in children.

Authors:  Kathleen L Keller; Laural K English; S Nicole Fearnbach; Marlou Lasschuijt; Kaitlin Anderson; Maria Bermudez; Jennifer O Fisher; Barbara J Rolls; Stephen J Wilson
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 3.868

4.  Discrepancy between implicit and explicit preferences for food portions in obesity.

Authors:  R Cserjesi; I De Vos; N Deroost
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 5.095

5.  Gender, Age, Hunger, and Body Mass Index as Factors Influencing Portion Size Estimation and Ideal Portion Sizes.

Authors:  Kalina Duszka; Markus Hechenberger; Irene Dolak; Deni Kobiljak; Jürgen König
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-05-11

6.  Portion Sizes from 24-Hour Dietary Recalls Differed by Sex among Those Who Selected the Same Portion Size Category on a Food Frequency Questionnaire.

Authors:  Minji Kang; Song-Yi Park; Carol J Boushey; Lynne R Wilkens; Kristine R Monroe; Loïc Le Marchand; Laurence N Kolonel; Suzanne P Murphy; Hee-Young Paik
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 4.910

7.  Exploratory study of web-based planning and mobile text reminders in an overweight population.

Authors:  Anastasia Soureti; Peter Murray; Mark Cobain; Mai Chinapaw; Willem van Mechelen; Robert Hurling
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  Recalled and momentary virtual portions created of snacks predict actual intake under laboratory stress condition.

Authors:  Jeon D Hamm; Rebecca R Klatzkin; Musya Herzog; Shoran Tamura; Jeffrey M Brunstrom; Harry R Kissileff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2021-05-29

9.  Personal and social norms for food portion sizes in lean and obese adults.

Authors:  H B Lewis; S E Forwood; A L Ahern; K Verlaers; E Robinson; S Higgs; S A Jebb
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 5.095

10.  Odd versus even: a scientific study of the 'rules' of plating.

Authors:  Andy T Woods; Charles Michel; Charles Spence
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.