BACKGROUND: Intracranial meningiomas are the most common primary brain tumors in dogs. Classification of meningiomas by tumor grade and subtype has not been reported, and the value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics for predicting tumor subtype and grade has not been investigated. HYPOTHESIS: Canine intracranial meningiomas are a heterogenous group of tumors with differing histological subtypes and grades. Prediction of histopathological classification is possible based on MRI characteristics. ANIMALS: One hundred and twelve dogs with a histological diagnosis of intracranial meningioma. METHODS: Retrospective observational study. RESULTS: Meningiomas were overrepresented in the Golden Retriever and Boxer breeds with no sex predilection. The incidence of specific tumor grades was 56% benign (Grade I), 43% atypical (Grade II), and 1% malignant (Grade III). Grade I histological subtypes included meningothelial (43%), transitional (40%), microcystic (8%), psammomatous (6%), and angiomatous (3%). No statistically significant (P < .05) associations were found among tumor subtype or grade and any of the MRI features studied. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Meningiomas in dogs differ from their counterparts in humans mainly in their higher incidence of atypical (Grade II) tumors observed. MRI characteristics do not allow for prediction of meningioma subtype or grade, emphasizing the necessity of histopathology for antemortem diagnosis. The higher incidence of atypical tumors in dogs may contribute to the poorer therapeutic response in dogs with meningiomas as compared with the response in humans with meningiomas.
BACKGROUND:Intracranial meningiomas are the most common primary brain tumors in dogs. Classification of meningiomas by tumor grade and subtype has not been reported, and the value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics for predicting tumor subtype and grade has not been investigated. HYPOTHESIS: Canineintracranial meningiomas are a heterogenous group of tumors with differing histological subtypes and grades. Prediction of histopathological classification is possible based on MRI characteristics. ANIMALS: One hundred and twelve dogs with a histological diagnosis of intracranial meningioma. METHODS: Retrospective observational study. RESULTS:Meningiomas were overrepresented in the Golden Retriever and Boxer breeds with no sex predilection. The incidence of specific tumor grades was 56% benign (Grade I), 43% atypical (Grade II), and 1% malignant (Grade III). Grade I histological subtypes included meningothelial (43%), transitional (40%), microcystic (8%), psammomatous (6%), and angiomatous (3%). No statistically significant (P < .05) associations were found among tumor subtype or grade and any of the MRI features studied. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Meningiomas in dogs differ from their counterparts in humans mainly in their higher incidence of atypical (Grade II) tumors observed. MRI characteristics do not allow for prediction of meningioma subtype or grade, emphasizing the necessity of histopathology for antemortem diagnosis. The higher incidence of atypical tumors in dogs may contribute to the poorer therapeutic response in dogs with meningiomas as compared with the response in humans with meningiomas.
Authors: Peter J Dickinson; Richard A LeCouteur; Robert J Higgins; John R Bringas; Richard F Larson; Yoji Yamashita; Michal T Krauze; John Forsayeth; Charles O Noble; Daryl C Drummond; Dmitri B Kirpotin; John W Park; Mitchel S Berger; Krystof S Bankiewicz Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2010-05-20 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Ane Uriarte; Pierre Moissonnier; Jean-Laurent Thibaud; Edouard Reyes-Gomez; Patrick Devauchelle; Stéphane Blot Journal: Can Vet J Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 1.008
Authors: R T Bentley; C P Ober; K L Anderson; D A Feeney; J F Naughton; J R Ohlfest; M G O'Sullivan; M A Miller; P D Constable; G E Pluhar Journal: Vet J Date: 2013-08-17 Impact factor: 2.688
Authors: John H Rossmeisl; Paulo A Garcia; Gregory B Daniel; John Daniel Bourland; Waldemar Debinski; Nikolaos Dervisis; Shawna Klahn Journal: Vet Radiol Ultrasound Date: 2013-11-13 Impact factor: 1.363
Authors: Brian M Andersen; G Elizabeth Pluhar; Charles E Seiler; Michelle R Goulart; Karen S SantaCruz; Melissa M Schutten; Joyce P Meints; M Gerard O'Sullivan; R Timothy Bentley; Rebecca A Packer; Stephanie A Thomovsky; Annie V Chen; Dominik Faissler; Wei Chen; Matthew A Hunt; Michael R Olin; John R Ohlfest Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2013-03-07 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Rachael Thomas; Shannon E Duke; Huixia J Wang; Tessa E Breen; Robert J Higgins; Keith E Linder; Peter Ellis; Cordelia F Langford; Peter J Dickinson; Natasha J Olby; Matthew Breen Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2009-03-31 Impact factor: 4.130