Literature DB >> 18463873

Accuracy of accelerated cine MR imaging at 3 Tesla in longitudinal follow-up of cardiac function.

Torleif A Sandner1, Philip Houck, Val M Runge, Spencer Sincleair, Armin M Huber, Daniel Theisen, Maximilian F Reiser, Bernd J Wintersperger.   

Abstract

The ability of fast, parallel-imaging-based cine magnetic resonance (MR) to monitor global cardiac function in longitudinal exams at 3 Tesla was evaluated. Seventeen patients with chronic cardiac disease underwent serial cine MR imaging exams (n=3) at 3 Tesla. Data were acquired in short-axis orientation using cine steady-state free precession (SSFP) with a spatial resolution of 2.5 x 1.9 mm(2) at 45 ms temporal resolution. Multislice imaging (three slices/breath-hold) was performed using TSENSE acceleration (R=3) and standard single-slice cine (non-TSENSE) was performed at identical locations in consecutive breath-holds. End-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), ejection fraction (EF) and myocardial mass (MM) of both cine approaches were compared for individual time-points as well as for longitudinal comparison. TSENSE-cine did not show significant differences for EDV (2.6 ml; P=0.79), ESV (2.2 ml; P=0.81), EF (-0.3%; P=0.95) and MM (2.4 g; P=0.72) in comparison with non-TSENSE. Longitudinal ANOVA analysis did not reveal significant differences for any parameter, neither for non-TSENSE data (all P>0.7) nor for TSENSE data (all P>0.9). Multifactorial ANOVA showed non-significant differences (all P>0.7) at comparable data variances. Data acquisition was significantly shortened using TSENSE. Threefold accelerated multislice cine at 3 Tesla allows accurate assessment of volumetric LV data and accurate longitudinal monitoring of global LV function at a substantially shorter overall examination time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18463873     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-008-0993-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  22 in total

1.  Dual breath-hold magnetic resonance cine evaluation of global and regional cardiac function.

Authors:  Bernd J Wintersperger; Spencer Sincleair; Val M Runge; Olaf Dietrich; Armin Huber; Maximilian F Reiser; Stefan O Schoenberg
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-04-22       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA).

Authors:  Mark A Griswold; Peter M Jakob; Robin M Heidemann; Mathias Nittka; Vladimir Jellus; Jianmin Wang; Berthold Kiefer; Axel Haase
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Reduction of transient signal oscillations in true-FISP using a linear flip angle series magnetization preparation.

Authors:  Vibhas S Deshpande; Yiu-Cho Chung; Qiang Zhang; Steven M Shea; Debiao Li
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Influence of high magnetic field strengths and parallel acquisition strategies on image quality in cardiac 2D CINE magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of 1.5 T vs. 3.0 T.

Authors:  Matthias Gutberlet; Kerstin Schwinge; Patrick Freyhardt; Birgit Spors; Matthias Grothoff; Timm Denecke; Lutz Lüdemann; Ralph Noeske; Thoralf Niendorf; Roland Felix
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-05-05       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  The reproducibility of left ventricular volume and mass measurements: a comparison between dual-inversion-recovery black-blood sequence and SSFP.

Authors:  Sarah Clay; Khaled Alfakih; Daniel R Messroghli; Timothy Jones; John P Ridgway; Mohan U Sivananthan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-08-20       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Comprehensive cardiac magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 Tesla: feasibility and implications for clinical applications.

Authors:  Matthias Gutberlet; Ralph Noeske; Kerstin Schwinge; Patrick Freyhardt; Roland Felix; Thoralf Niendorf
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 6.016

7.  Simultaneous acquisition of spatial harmonics (SMASH): fast imaging with radiofrequency coil arrays.

Authors:  D K Sodickson; W J Manning
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Reduction in sample size for studies of remodeling in heart failure by the use of cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  N G Bellenger; L C Davies; J M Francis; A J Coats; D J Pennell
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.364

9.  Predictors of late development of heart failure in stable survivors of myocardial infarction: the CARE study.

Authors:  Eldrin F Lewis; Lemuel A Moye; Jean L Rouleau; Frank M Sacks; J Malcolm O Arnold; J Wayne Warnica; Greg C Flaker; Eugene Braunwald; Marc A Pfeffer
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Cardiac cine MR-imaging at 3T: FLASH vs SSFP.

Authors:  Damian J Tyler; Lucy E Hudsmith; Steffen E Petersen; Jane M Francis; Peter Weale; Stefan Neubauer; Kieran Clarke; Matthew D Robson
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.364

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Parallel MR imaging.

Authors:  Anagha Deshmane; Vikas Gulani; Mark A Griswold; Nicole Seiberlich
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 2.  Current and emerging modalities for detection of cardiotoxicity in cardio-oncology.

Authors:  Michel G Khouri; Michael R Klein; Eric J Velazquez; Lee W Jones
Journal:  Future Cardiol       Date:  2015-08-03

Review 3.  Quantification in cardiac MRI: advances in image acquisition and processing.

Authors:  Anil K Attili; Andreas Schuster; Eike Nagel; Johan H C Reiber; Rob J van der Geest
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.357

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.