Literature DB >> 19288109

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in MR mammography (MRM): clinical comparison of echo planar imaging (EPI) and half-Fourier single-shot turbo spin echo (HASTE) diffusion techniques.

P A T Baltzer1, D M Renz, K-H Herrmann, M Dietzel, I Krumbein, M Gajda, O Camara, J R Reichenbach, W A Kaiser.   

Abstract

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) techniques have shown potential to differentiate between benign and malignant neoplasms. However, the diagnostic significance of using DWI under routine conditions remains unclear. This study investigated the use of echo planar imaging (EPI) and half-Fourier acquired single-shot turbo spin echo (HASTE)-DWI with respect to the three parameters: lesion visibility, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements, and size estimation. Following MRM (1.5 T), EPI- and HASTE-DWI were applied in 65 patients. Lesion visibility on DWI was compared with lesion visibility on subtracted contrast-enhanced T1w images (CE-T1w). Statistical tests were applied to diameter, visibility, and ADC value measurements. Seventy-four lesions were identified. ADC value measurements did not differ significantly between the two DWI sequences. The sensitivity and specificity of routine diagnostics (97.4% and 85.7%) were superior to EPI-DWI (87.2% and 82.9%) and HASTE-DWI (76.9% and 88.6%). Selecting only nonmass lesions, DWI did not prove to be of diagnostic value. Lesion demarcation by DWI was significantly lower compared with that by CE-T1w, with EPI-DWI showing the better performance (p < 0.001). No significant differences were found for size measurements between CE-T1w and DWI. Although clearly inferior compared with CE-T1w imaging, both DWI techniques are applicable for lesion assessment and size measurements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19288109     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-009-1326-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  28 in total

1.  Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions?

Authors:  C K Kuhl; P Mielcareck; S Klaschik; C Leutner; E Wardelmann; J Gieseke; H H Schild
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Sensitivity of MRI versus mammography for detecting foci of multifocal, multicentric breast cancer in Fatty and dense breasts using the whole-breast pathologic examination as a gold standard.

Authors:  Francesco Sardanelli; Gian M Giuseppetti; Pietro Panizza; Massimo Bazzocchi; Alfonso Fausto; Giovanni Simonetti; Vincenzo Lattanzio; Alessandro Del Maschio
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Quantitative diffusion imaging in breast cancer: a clinical prospective study.

Authors:  Erika Rubesova; Anne-Sophie Grell; Viviane De Maertelaer; Thierry Metens; Shih-Li Chao; Marc Lemort
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Quantification of water compartmentation in cell suspensions by diffusion-weighted and T(2)-weighted MRI.

Authors:  Yiftach Roth; Aharon Ocherashvilli; Dianne Daniels; Jesus Ruiz-Cabello; Stephan E Maier; Arie Orenstein; Yael Mardor
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 2.546

5.  Classification of hypervascularized lesions in CE MR imaging of the breast.

Authors:  F Baum; U Fischer; R Vosshenrich; E Grabbe
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-02-02       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion-weighted imaging.

Authors:  Yong Guo; You-Quan Cai; Zu-Long Cai; Yuan-Gui Gao; Ning-Yu An; Lin Ma; Srikanth Mahankali; Jia-Hong Gao
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 7.  Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer.

Authors:  Nehmat Houssami; Stefano Ciatto; Petra Macaskill; Sarah J Lord; Ruth M Warren; J Michael Dixon; Les Irwig
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-05-12       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Detecting breast cancer with non-contrast MR imaging: combining diffusion-weighted and STIR imaging.

Authors:  Seiko Kuroki-Suzuki; Yoshifumi Kuroki; Katsuhiro Nasu; Shigeru Nawano; Noriyuki Moriyama; Masatoshi Okazaki
Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.471

9.  Quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differential diagnosis of breast lesion.

Authors:  C Marini; C Iacconi; M Giannelli; A Cilotti; M Moretti; C Bartolozzi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-03-14       Impact factor: 7.034

10.  Breast MRI: guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging.

Authors:  R M Mann; C K Kuhl; K Kinkel; C Boetes
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  35 in total

1.  Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: a pilot study.

Authors:  Pascal A T Baltzer; Anja Schäfer; Matthias Dietzel; David Grässel; Mieczyslaw Gajda; Oumar Camara; Werner A Kaiser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast tumours at 3 Tesla and 7 Tesla: a comparison.

Authors:  S Gruber; L Minarikova; K Pinker; O Zaric; M Chmelik; B Strasser; P Baltzer; T Helbich; S Trattnig; W Bogner
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Quantitative breast MRI: 2D histogram analysis of diffusion tensor parameters in normal tissue.

Authors:  Julia Wiederer; Shila Pazahr; Cornelia Leo; Daniel Nanz; Andreas Boss
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  Sensitivity and specificity of unenhanced MR mammography (DWI combined with T2-weighted TSE imaging, ueMRM) for the differentiation of mass lesions.

Authors:  Pascal A T Baltzer; Matthias Benndorf; Matthias Dietzel; Mieczyslaw Gajda; Oumar Camara; Werner A Kaiser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Current Status and New Developments in Breast MRI.

Authors:  Katja C Siegmann; Bernhard Krämer; Claus Claussen
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Region of interest demarcation for quantification of the apparent diffusion coefficient in breast lesions and its interobserver variability.

Authors:  Luísa Nogueira; Sofia Brandão; Eduarda Matos; Rita Gouveia Nunes; Hugo Alexandre Ferreira; Joana Loureiro; Isabel Ramos
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.630

Review 7.  Effect of b value and pre-admission of contrast on diagnostic accuracy of 1.5-T breast DWI: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Monique D Dorrius; Hildebrand Dijkstra; Matthijs Oudkerk; Paul E Sijens
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-08-09       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast lesions: Region-of-interest placement and different ADC parameters influence apparent diffusion coefficient values.

Authors:  Hubert Bickel; Katja Pinker; Stephan Polanec; Heinrich Magometschnigg; Georg Wengert; Claudio Spick; Wolfgang Bogner; Zsuzsanna Bago-Horvath; Thomas H Helbich; Pascal Baltzer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  Diffusion-weighted breast MRI: Clinical applications and emerging techniques.

Authors:  Savannah C Partridge; Noam Nissan; Habib Rahbar; Averi E Kitsch; Eric E Sigmund
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Evaluation of breast cancer using intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) histogram analysis: comparison with malignant status, histological subtype, and molecular prognostic factors.

Authors:  Gene Young Cho; Linda Moy; Sungheon G Kim; Steven H Baete; Melanie Moccaldi; James S Babb; Daniel K Sodickson; Eric E Sigmund
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-11-28       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.