Literature DB >> 18460602

Different assemblies of the DAM1 complex follow shortening microtubules by distinct mechanisms.

E L Grishchuk1, I S Spiridonov, V A Volkov, A Efremov, S Westermann, D Drubin, G Barnes, F I Ataullakhanov, J R McIntosh.   

Abstract

Mitotic chromosomes segregate at the ends of shortening spindle microtubules (MTs). In budding yeast, the Dam1 multiprotein complex supports this dynamic attachment, thereby contributing to accurate chromosome segregation. Purified Dam1 will track the end of a depolymerizing MT and can couple it to microbead transport in vitro. The processivity of such motions has been thought to depend on rings that the Dam1 complex can form around MTs, but the possibility that alternative coupling geometries contribute to these motilities has not been considered. Here, we demonstrate that both rings and nonencircling Dam1 oligomers can track MT ends and enable processive cargo movement in vitro. The coupling properties of these two assemblies are, however, quite different, so each may make a distinct contribution to chromosome motility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18460602      PMCID: PMC2383981          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0801811105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  25 in total

Review 1.  Chromosome-microtubule interactions during mitosis.

Authors:  J Richard McIntosh; Ekaterina L Grishchuk; Robert R West
Journal:  Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2002-04-02       Impact factor: 13.827

2.  Formation of a dynamic kinetochore- microtubule interface through assembly of the Dam1 ring complex.

Authors:  Stefan Westermann; Agustin Avila-Sakar; Hong-Wei Wang; Hanspeter Niederstrasser; Jonathan Wong; David G Drubin; Eva Nogales; Georjana Barnes
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2005-01-21       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 3.  The dynamic kinetochore-microtubule interface.

Authors:  Helder Maiato; Jennifer DeLuca; E D Salmon; William C Earnshaw
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 5.285

4.  Analysis of high resolution recordings of motor movement.

Authors:  S M Block; K Svoboda
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Force production by depolymerizing microtubules: load-velocity curves and run-pause statistics.

Authors:  C S Peskin; G F Oster
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Minus-end-directed motion of kinesin-coated microspheres driven by microtubule depolymerization.

Authors:  V A Lombillo; R J Stewart; J R McIntosh
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-01-12       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Stable kinetochore-microtubule attachment constrains centromere positioning in metaphase.

Authors:  Chad G Pearson; Elaine Yeh; Melissa Gardner; David Odde; E D Salmon; Kerry Bloom
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-11-09       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Simulating the role of microtubules in depolymerization-driven transport: a Monte Carlo approach.

Authors:  Y C Tao; C S Peskin
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Microtubule depolymerization promotes particle and chromosome movement in vitro.

Authors:  M Coue; V A Lombillo; J R McIntosh
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Molecular architecture of the kinetochore-microtubule attachment site is conserved between point and regional centromeres.

Authors:  Ajit P Joglekar; David Bouck; Ken Finley; Xingkun Liu; Yakun Wan; Judith Berman; Xiangwei He; E D Salmon; Kerry S Bloom
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2008-05-12       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  59 in total

Review 1.  Biophysics of mitosis.

Authors:  J Richard McIntosh; Maxim I Molodtsov; Fazly I Ataullakhanov
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 5.318

2.  Force transduction by the microtubule-bound Dam1 ring.

Authors:  Jonathan W Armond; Matthew S Turner
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 3.  The perpetual movements of anaphase.

Authors:  Helder Maiato; Mariana Lince-Faria
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2010-03-21       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 4.  Tubulin depolymerization may be an ancient biological motor.

Authors:  J Richard McIntosh; Vladimir Volkov; Fazly I Ataullakhanov; Ekaterina L Grishchuk
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 5.285

5.  Preparation of segmented microtubules to study motions driven by the disassembling microtubule ends.

Authors:  Vladimir A Volkov; Anatoly V Zaytsev; Ekaterina L Grishchuk
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 6.  Reconstituting the kinetochore–microtubule interface: what, why, and how.

Authors:  Bungo Akiyoshi; Sue Biggins
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 7.  Bi-orienting chromosomes: acrobatics on the mitotic spindle.

Authors:  Tomoyuki U Tanaka
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2008-08-02       Impact factor: 4.316

8.  Fibrils connect microtubule tips with kinetochores: a mechanism to couple tubulin dynamics to chromosome motion.

Authors:  J Richard McIntosh; Ekaterina L Grishchuk; Mary K Morphew; Artem K Efremov; Kirill Zhudenkov; Vladimir A Volkov; Iain M Cheeseman; Arshad Desai; David N Mastronarde; Fazly I Ataullakhanov
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 9.  Microtubule attachment and spindle assembly checkpoint signalling at the kinetochore.

Authors:  Emily A Foley; Tarun M Kapoor
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 94.444

10.  Assembling the protein architecture of the budding yeast kinetochore-microtubule attachment using FRET.

Authors:  Pavithra Aravamudhan; Isabella Felzer-Kim; Kaushik Gurunathan; Ajit P Joglekar
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 10.834

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.