Literature DB >> 15530400

Stable kinetochore-microtubule attachment constrains centromere positioning in metaphase.

Chad G Pearson1, Elaine Yeh, Melissa Gardner, David Odde, E D Salmon, Kerry Bloom.   

Abstract

With a single microtubule attachment, budding-yeast kinetochores provide an excellent system for understanding the coordinated linkage to dynamic microtubule plus ends for chromosome oscillation and positioning. Fluorescent tagging of kinetochore proteins indicates that, on average, all centromeres are clustered, distinctly separated from their sisters, and positioned equidistant from their respective spindle poles during metaphase. However, individual fluorescent chromosome markers near the centromere transiently reassociate with their sisters and oscillate from one spindle half to the other. To reconcile the apparent disparity between the average centromere position and individual centromere proximal markers, we utilized fluorescence recovery after photobleaching to measure stability of the histone-H3 variant Cse4p/CENP-A. Newly synthesized Cse4p replaces old protein during DNA replication. Once assembled, Cse4-GFP is a physically stable component of centromeres during mitosis. This allowed us to follow centromere dynamics within each spindle half. Kinetochores remain stably attached to dynamic microtubules and exhibit a low incidence of switching orientation or position between the spindle halves. Switching of sister chromatid attachment may be contemporaneous with Cse4p exchange and early kinetochore assembly during S phase; this would promote mixing of chromosome attachment to each spindle pole. Once biorientation is attained, centromeres rarely make excursions beyond their proximal half spindle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15530400     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.09.086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  98 in total

1.  Laterally attached kinetochores recruit the checkpoint protein Bub1, but satisfy the spindle checkpoint.

Authors:  Michelle M Shimogawa; Megan M Wargacki; Eric G Muller; Trisha N Davis
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 2.  Centromere identity: a challenge to be faced.

Authors:  Gunjan D Mehta; Meenakshi P Agarwal; Santanu Kumar Ghosh
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 3.291

3.  Cytoskeletal dynamics in fission yeast: a review of models for polarization and division.

Authors:  Tyler Drake; Dimitrios Vavylonis
Journal:  HFSP J       Date:  2010-04-15

Review 4.  Neocentromeres and epigenetically inherited features of centromeres.

Authors:  Laura S Burrack; Judith Berman
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 5.239

5.  Psh1 is an E3 ubiquitin ligase that targets the centromeric histone variant Cse4.

Authors:  Geetha Hewawasam; Manjunatha Shivaraju; Mark Mattingly; Swaminathan Venkatesh; Skylar Martin-Brown; Laurence Florens; Jerry L Workman; Jennifer L Gerton
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 17.970

6.  S. cerevisiae chromosomes biorient via gradual resolution of syntely between S phase and anaphase.

Authors:  Eugenio Marco; Jonas F Dorn; Pei-Hsin Hsu; Khuloud Jaqaman; Peter K Sorger; Gaudenz Danuser
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  The CNA1 histone of the ciliate Tetrahymena thermophila is essential for chromosome segregation in the germline micronucleus.

Authors:  Marcella D Cervantes; Xiaohui Xi; Danielle Vermaak; Meng-Chao Yao; Harmit S Malik
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 4.138

8.  De novo kinetochore assembly requires the centromeric histone H3 variant.

Authors:  Kimberly A Collins; Andrea R Castillo; Sean Y Tatsutani; Sue Biggins
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2005-10-05       Impact factor: 4.138

Review 9.  Chromosome bi-orientation on the mitotic spindle.

Authors:  Tomoyuki U Tanaka
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-03-29       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Tension-dependent regulation of microtubule dynamics at kinetochores can explain metaphase congression in yeast.

Authors:  Melissa K Gardner; Chad G Pearson; Brian L Sprague; Ted R Zarzar; Kerry Bloom; E D Salmon; David J Odde
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 4.138

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.