H Ideguchi1, S Ohno, K Takase, A Ueda, Y Ishigatsubo. 1. Center for Rheumatic Diseases, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Minami-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 232-0024, Japan.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Most patients who switched to a second bisphosphonate continued their treatment long term, although those who stopped their first drug because of adverse events were likely to discontinue the second drug for the same reason. Switching to another bisphosphonate is a reasonable treatment option for some patients with treatment failure. INTRODUCTION: Patients who experience treatment failure with a bisphosphonate because of adverse events (AEs) or other reasons might receive a second bisphosphonate. However, the frequency and benefits of switching bisphosphonates are unknown. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 197 men and 1110 women newly treated with bisphosphonates between 1 January 2000 and 30 June 2005 at our university hospital. RESULTS: Among the 497 patients who discontinued bisphosphonate treatment, 146 were switched to a second bisphosphonate. The cumulative probabilities of persistence of treatment after 3 years were 45% with the first bisphosphonate and 65% with the second (P = 0.017). Age >or=65 years, switching bisphosphonates because of AEs, and male gender were associated (P < 0.05) with low persistence of treatment with the second bisphosphonate. Discontinuation of the first drug because of AEs was associated with an increased rate of discontinuation of the second drug because of AEs (hazard ratio, 4.2; 95% confidence interval, 2.1-8.4). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who switched bisphosphonates had high rates of persistence of therapy. Those who stopped their first bisphosphonate because of AEs were at risk of discontinuing the second drug for the same reason. Switching to another bisphosphonate is a reasonable treatment option for some patients with treatment failure.
UNLABELLED: Most patients who switched to a second bisphosphonate continued their treatment long term, although those who stopped their first drug because of adverse events were likely to discontinue the second drug for the same reason. Switching to another bisphosphonate is a reasonable treatment option for some patients with treatment failure. INTRODUCTION:Patients who experience treatment failure with a bisphosphonate because of adverse events (AEs) or other reasons might receive a second bisphosphonate. However, the frequency and benefits of switching bisphosphonates are unknown. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 197 men and 1110 women newly treated with bisphosphonates between 1 January 2000 and 30 June 2005 at our university hospital. RESULTS: Among the 497 patients who discontinued bisphosphonate treatment, 146 were switched to a second bisphosphonate. The cumulative probabilities of persistence of treatment after 3 years were 45% with the first bisphosphonate and 65% with the second (P = 0.017). Age >or=65 years, switching bisphosphonates because of AEs, and male gender were associated (P < 0.05) with low persistence of treatment with the second bisphosphonate. Discontinuation of the first drug because of AEs was associated with an increased rate of discontinuation of the second drug because of AEs (hazard ratio, 4.2; 95% confidence interval, 2.1-8.4). CONCLUSIONS:Patients who switched bisphosphonates had high rates of persistence of therapy. Those who stopped their first bisphosphonate because of AEs were at risk of discontinuing the second drug for the same reason. Switching to another bisphosphonate is a reasonable treatment option for some patients with treatment failure.
Authors: M Fukunaga; K Kushida; H Kishimoto; M Shiraki; Y Taketani; H Minaguchi; T Inoue; R Morita; H Morii; K Yamamoto; Y Ohashi; H Orimo Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Anna N A Tosteson; Margaret R Grove; Cristina S Hammond; Megan M Moncur; G Thomas Ray; Gwen M Hebert; Alice R Pressman; Bruce Ettinger Journal: Am J Med Date: 2003-08-15 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Catherine MacLean; Sydne Newberry; Margaret Maglione; Maureen McMahon; Veena Ranganath; Marika Suttorp; Walter Mojica; Martha Timmer; Alicia Alexander; Melissa McNamara; Sheetal B Desai; Annie Zhou; Susan Chen; Jason Carter; Carlo Tringale; Di Valentine; Breanne Johnsen; Jennifer Grossman Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2007-12-17 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: E Seeman; J Compston; J Adachi; M L Brandi; C Cooper; B Dawson-Hughes; B Jönsson; H Pols; J A Cramer Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2007-01-24 Impact factor: 5.071
Authors: Helena Parente Vieira; Ingrid Almeida Leite; Thayga Maria Araújo Sampaio; Juliane Dos Anjos de Paula; Ankilma do Nascimento Andrade; Luiz Carlos de Abreu; Vitor E Valenti; Flavia C Goulart; Fernando Adami Journal: Int Arch Med Date: 2013-05-24
Authors: A Modi; P R Ebeling; M S Lee; Y K Min; A Mithal; X Yang; S Baidya; S Sen; S Sajjan Journal: Arch Osteoporos Date: 2017-07-17 Impact factor: 2.617