Literature DB >> 12459940

A comparison of the effect of risedronate and etidronate on lumbar bone mineral density in Japanese patients with osteoporosis: a randomized controlled trial.

M Fukunaga1, K Kushida, H Kishimoto, M Shiraki, Y Taketani, H Minaguchi, T Inoue, R Morita, H Morii, K Yamamoto, Y Ohashi, H Orimo.   

Abstract

To demonstrate the clinical benefit of 2.5 mg daily risedronate in the treatment of involutional osteoporosis, the effect of risedronate on bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine was compared with that of etidronate, selected as a representative of the bisphosphonates currently marketed in Japan. In this multicenter, randomized, double-masked, active (etidronate) controlled comparative study, a total of 235 Japanese patients with involutional osteoporosis were randomized to receive either treatment with 2.5 mg/day of risedronate for 48 weeks or intermittent treatment with etidronate (4 cycles of 2 weeks of treatment with 200 mg/day followed by 10-week medication-free periods). All patients received 200 mg of calcium supplement daily in the form of the calcium lactate. Bone mineral density of the lumbar spine (L2-L4 BMD) was determined at 12, 24, 36 and 48 weeks by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. The primary endpoint was the percent change in L2-L4 BMD from baseline to the time of final evaluation. Changes in biochemical markers of bone turnover and safety profiles were also compared. A significant increase in L2-L4 BMD was observed at 12 weeks after initiation of therapy in both the risedronate (2.8%) and etidronate (1.8%) groups. The increase in L2-L4 BMD at the time of final evaluation in the risedronate group (4.9%) was significantly greater ( p = 0.002) than that in the etidronate group (3.1%). The changes in bone resorption markers (urinary total deoxypyridinoline and N-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen) from baseline to 48 weeks were -37.6% and -41.3% for risedronate and -22.5% and -26.6% for etidronate, respectively. New vertebral fractures or deterioration of existing fractures were observed in 2.8% (3/106) of the patients in the etidronate group, while no such cases (0/101) were observed in the risedronate group. No significant difference in the incidence of adverse events was found between two treatments. Daily oral risedronate (2.5 mg) exhibited efficacy superior to that of intermittent cyclical etidronate (200 mg) in increasing L2-L4 BMD, and was well tolerated by Japanese patients with involutional osteoporosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12459940     DOI: 10.1007/s001980200135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  27 in total

1.  Risedronate improves proximal femur bone density and geometry in patients with osteoporosis or osteopenia and clinical risk factors of fractures: a practice-based observational study.

Authors:  Masayuki Takakuwa; Jun Iwamoto; Masahisa Konishi; Qi Zhou; Koichi Itabashi
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 2.  Efficacy of antiresorptive agents for preventing fractures in Japanese patients with an increased fracture risk: review of the literature.

Authors:  Jun Iwamoto; Yoshihiro Sato; Tsuyoshi Takeda; Hideo Matsumoto
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 3.923

3.  Efficacy, tolerability, and safety of risedronate in Japanese patients with Paget's disease of bone.

Authors:  Kousei Yoh; Shinjiro Takata; Noriko Yoshimura; Jun Hashimoto
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Effect of risedronate on speed of sound in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Authors:  Jun Iwamoto; Tetsuya Takada; Yoshihiro Sato; Hideo Matsumoto
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2013-10-18

5.  Phase II/III, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study of monthly delayed-release versus daily immediate-release risedronate tablets in Japanese patients with involutional osteoporosis.

Authors:  Satoshi Soen; Hideaki Kishimoto; Hiroshi Hagino; Teruki Sone; Hiroaki Ohishi; Tsukasa Fujimoto; Emma Sasaki; Sakae Tanaka; Toshitsugu Sugimoto
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Efficacy and tolerability of once-weekly administration of 17.5 mg risedronate in Japanese patients with involutional osteoporosis: a comparison with 2.5-mg once-daily dosage regimen.

Authors:  Hideaki Kishimoto; Masao Fukunaga; Kazuhiro Kushida; Masataka Shiraki; Akira Itabashi; Hajime Nawata; Toshitaka Nakamura; Hiroaki Ohta; Kunio Takaoka; Yasuo Ohashi
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Comparative gastrointestinal safety of bisphosphonates in primary osteoporosis: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Tadrous; L Wong; M M Mamdani; D N Juurlink; M D Krahn; L E Lévesque; S M Cadarette
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Persistence with bisphosphonate therapy including treatment courses with multiple sequential bisphosphonates in the real world.

Authors:  H Ideguchi; S Ohno; H Hattori; Y Ishigatsubo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Outcomes after switching from one bisphosphonate to another in 146 patients at a single university hospital.

Authors:  H Ideguchi; S Ohno; K Takase; A Ueda; Y Ishigatsubo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 10.  Osteoporosis and treatments in Japan: management for preventing subsequent fractures.

Authors:  Shuko Nojiri; Russel T Burge; Jennifer A Flynn; Shonda A Foster; Hideaki Sowa
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 2.626

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.