Literature DB >> 18457295

Nausea induced by vection drum: contributions of body position, visual pattern, and gender.

Sibylle Klosterhalfen1, Eric R Muth, Sandra Kellermann, Karin Meissner, Paul Enck.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this work was to investigate intrinsic (gender) and extrinsic factors (body position, visual pattern) and their relative contribution to the development of motion sickness during pseudo-rotation.
METHODS: A series of 3 experiments with 24, 12, and 48 subjects respectively, balanced for gender, was completed: Experiment 1 investigated the effect of body position (upright, supine) and gender; Experiment 2 investigated the additional influence of the visual pattern (dots, stripes), but only for the supine position; and Experiment 3 investigated the complex interaction of gender, body position, and visual pattern on symptom rating (SR), rotation tolerance (RT), and time to first perception of vection (VT). A novel vection drum that allowed varied body positions and visual patterns was used to create pseudo-rotation.
RESULTS: Experiment 1: there was a significant effect of rotation on SR, and a significant rotation x position interaction such that the rotation-induced symptom increase was significantly higher in the supine compared to the upright position. In addition, there was a significant effect of gender, with women showing lower SR in both positions. RT was lower while supine compared to upright; this effect was significantly more pronounced in male subjects. Experiment 2: a significant effect of rotation on SR was found, but no effect of the visual stimulus pattern or gender on SR, RT, or VT. Women exhibited significantly lower VT than men. Experiment 3: rotation induced a significant increase in SR independent of gender, body position, and visual pattern. Supine position induced significantly higher SR and RT than upright, and a significant interaction between gender, body position, and visual pattern.
CONCLUSION: The complex interaction of intrinsic and extrinsic factors may partially explain the mixed findings in the literature regarding the relationship of gender to motion sickness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18457295     DOI: 10.3357/asem.2187.2008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med        ISSN: 0095-6562


  5 in total

1.  The efficacy of airflow and seat vibration on reducing visually induced motion sickness.

Authors:  Sarah D'Amour; Jelte E Bos; Behrang Keshavarz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Predicting vection and visually induced motion sickness based on spontaneous postural activity.

Authors:  Stephen Palmisano; Benjamin Arcioni; Paul J Stapley
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  How to study placebo responses in motion sickness with a rotation chair paradigm in healthy participants.

Authors:  Katja Weimer; Björn Horing; Eric R Muth; Paul Enck
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-12-14       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  Effects of horizontal acceleration on human visual acuity and stereopsis.

Authors:  Chi-Ting Horng; Yih-Shou Hsieh; Ming-Ling Tsai; Wei-Kang Chang; Tzu-Hung Yang; Chien-Han Yauan; Chih-Hung Wang; Wu-Hsien Kuo; Yi-Chang Wu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Exploring the Participant-Related Determinants of Simulator Sickness in a Physical Motion Car Rollover Simulation as Measured by the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire.

Authors:  Piotr Rzeźniczek; Agnieszka Lipiak; Bartosz Bilski; Ida Laudańska-Krzemińska; Marcin Cybulski; Ewelina Chawłowska
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-26       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.