Literature DB >> 18455533

Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: anatomic outcomes and complications with Pelvicol, autologous and synthetic graft materials.

Lieschen H Quiroz1, Robert E Gutman, Stuart Shippey, Geoffery W Cundiff, Tatiana Sanses, Joan L Blomquist, Victoria L Handa.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare anatomic outcomes and graft-related complications (GRCs) for abdominal sacrocolpopexy (ASC) with Pelvicol (CR BARD, Murray Hill, NJ), autologous fascia, and synthetic grafts. STUDY
DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study of ASC from 2001-2005. We reviewed anatomic outcomes and GRCs. Apical failure was defined as >stage 0.
RESULTS: Of 259 ASC procedures, Pelvicol was used in 102 procedures (39%); synthetic mesh in 134 procedures (52%), and autologous fascia in 23 procedures (9%). Mean postoperative follow up was 1.1 years. Apical failure by graft group were Pelvicol 10 (11%), synthetics 1 (1%), and autologous 1 (7%; P = .011). All 7 reoperations for apical prolapse were in the Pelvicol group. GRCs occurred in 16% of the cases, with a higher proportion of erosions in the Pelvicol group (11% vs 3% and 4%; P = .045). Reoperations as a result of GRC were similar between groups.
CONCLUSION: ASC is more likely to fail with Pelvicol than with synthetic or autologous grafts. The use of Pelvicol did not reduce graft-related complications in this population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18455533     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.01.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  20 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation of current biologic meshes in pelvic organ prolapse repair.

Authors:  Ashley Cox; Sender Herschorn
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Traditional native tissue versus mesh-augmented pelvic organ prolapse repairs: providing an accurate interpretation of current literature.

Authors:  E J Stanford; A Cassidenti; M D Moen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Mobility and stress analysis of different surgical simulations during a sacral colpopexy, using a finite element model of the pelvic system.

Authors:  Estelle Jeanditgautier; Olivier Mayeur; Mathias Brieu; Gery Lamblin; Chrystele Rubod; Michel Cosson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 4.  Robotic Sacrocolpopexy-Is It the Treatment of Choice for Advanced Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse?

Authors:  Janine L Oliver; Ja-Hong Kim
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 5.  Complications of pelvic organ prolapse surgery and methods of prevention.

Authors:  Renaud de Tayrac; Loic Sentilhes
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Anatomic outcomes of abdominal sacrocolpopexy with or without paravaginal repair.

Authors:  Stuart H Shippey; Lieschen H Quiroz; Tatiana V D Sanses; Leise R Knoepp; Geoffrey W Cundiff; Victoria L Handa
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Surgical interventions for uterine prolapse and for vault prolapse: the two VUE RCTs.

Authors:  Christine Hemming; Lynda Constable; Beatriz Goulao; Mary Kilonzo; Dwayne Boyers; Andrew Elders; Kevin Cooper; Anthony Smith; Robert Freeman; Suzanne Breeman; Alison McDonald; Suzanne Hagen; Isobel Montgomery; John Norrie; Cathryn Glazener
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 4.014

Review 8.  Tissue engineering as a potential alternative or adjunct to surgical reconstruction in treating pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  M Boennelycke; S Gras; G Lose
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Single versus multi-dose antibiotic prophylaxis for pelvic organ prolapse surgery with graft/mesh.

Authors:  Uduak U Andy; Heidi S Harvie; Mary F Ackenbom; Lily A Arya
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 2.435

10.  Shrinkage and biomechanical evaluation of lightweight synthetics in a rabbit model for primary fascial repair.

Authors:  Yves Ozog; Maja L Konstantinovic; Erika Werbrouck; Dirk De Ridder; Mazza Edoardo; Jan Deprest
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 2.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.