Literature DB >> 18454372

Repeatability of intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanical properties measurements by the ocular response analyser.

M Kynigopoulos1, T Schlote, A Kotecha, A Tzamalis, B Pajic, I Haefliger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Ocular Response Analyser (ORA, Reichert Ophthalmic Instruments) is a non-contact applanation tonometer, providing two measures of intraocular pressure (IOP) - IOPg which represents a Goldmann equivalent IOP measure and IOPcc, representing a measure of IOP independent of corneal effects. In addition, the device provides two measures believed to represent corneal biomechanical properties: corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF). The aim of this study was to assess the repeatability of these measurements. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One randomly chosen eye from 49 healthy volunteers was measured four times consecutively with the ORA prior to Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT). The repeatability coefficient (RC), the coefficient of variation (CV) and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were calculated as a measure of intrasession repeatability.
RESULTS: CH was the most variable and IOPg the most repeatable measure, with an RC of 2.61 and 1.97, respectively, and ICC of 0.86 and 0.92, respectively. CV ranged between 5.73 % for IOPg and 12.38 % for CH. ORA IOP measurements were higher than GAT (IOPcc = 17.43 +/- 3.23; IOPg = 17.53 +/- 3.0; GAT = 15.75 +/- 2.77 mmHg).
CONCLUSIONS: ORA measurements show good short-term repeatability in normal volunteers. Thus, this device appears to be applicable in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18454372     DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1027256

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd        ISSN: 0023-2165            Impact factor:   0.700


  11 in total

1.  Intraocular pressure measured by dynamic contour tonometer and ocular response analyzer in normal tension glaucoma.

Authors:  Tetsuya Morita; Nobuyuki Shoji; Kazutaka Kamiya; Mana Hagishima; Fusako Fujimura; Kimiya Shimizu
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 2.  Tonometers-which one should I use?

Authors:  Kanza Aziz; David S Friedman
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Reproducibility of ocular response analyzer measurements and their correlation with central corneal thickness.

Authors:  Joanna Wasielica-Poslednik; Fatmire Berisha; Shakhsanam Aliyeva; Norbert Pfeiffer; Esther M Hoffmann
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Ocular biomechanical measurements on post-keratoplasty corneas using a Scheimpflug-based noncontact device.

Authors:  Laszlo Modis; Ziad Hassan; Eszter Szalai; Zsuzsanna Flaskó; Andras Berta; Gabor Nemeth
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 1.779

5.  [Biomechanical condition of the cornea as a new indicator for pathological and structural changes].

Authors:  E Spörl; N Terai; M Haustein; A G Böhm; F Raiskup-Wolf; L E Pillunat
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.059

6.  Efficacy of a contact lens sensor for monitoring 24-h intraocular pressure related patterns.

Authors:  Kaweh Mansouri; Robert N Weinreb; John H K Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A Contralateral Eye Study Comparing Corneal Biomechanics in Subjects with Bilateral Keratoconus with Unilateral Vogt's Striae.

Authors:  Farshad Askarizadeh; Mohamad-Reza Sedaghat; Hadi Ostadi-Moghaddam; Foroozan Narooie-Noori; Tahereh Rakhshandadi; Sattar Rajabi
Journal:  Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol       Date:  2017

8.  Tonographic Effect of Ocular Response Analyzer in Comparison to Goldmann Applanation Tonometry.

Authors:  Martin Zimmermann; Susanne Pitz; Irene Schmidtmann; Norbert Pfeiffer; Joanna Wasielica-Poslednik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Advances in Biomechanical Parameters for Screening of Refractive Surgery Candidates: A Review of the Literature, Part III.

Authors:  Majid Moshirfar; Mahsaw N Motlagh; Michael S Murri; Hamed Momeni-Moghaddam; Yasmyne C Ronquillo; Phillip C Hoopes
Journal:  Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol       Date:  2019

10.  Intraocular Pressure Measurement Using Ocular Response Analyzer, Dynamic Contour Tonometer, and Scheimpflug Analyzer Corvis ST.

Authors:  Lisa Ramm; Robert Herber; Eberhard Spoerl; Frederik Raiskup; Lutz E Pillunat; Naim Terai
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 1.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.