Literature DB >> 18454314

Categorization framework to aid exposure assessment of nanomaterials in consumer products.

Steffen Foss Hansen1, Evan S Michelson, Anja Kamper, Pernille Borling, Frank Stuer-Lauridsen, Anders Baun.   

Abstract

Exposure assessment is crucial for risk assessment for nanomaterials. We propose a framework to aid exposure assessment in consumer products. We determined the location of the nanomaterials and the chemical identify of the 580 products listed in the inventory maintained by the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, of which 37% used nanoparticles suspended in liquids, whereas <1% contained "free airborne nanoparticles". C(60) is currently only used as suspended nanoparticles in liquids and nanosilver is used more as surface bound nanoparticles than as particles suspended in liquids. Based on the location of the nanostructure we were able to further group the products into categories of: (1) expected, (2) possible, and (3) no expected exposure. Most products fall into the category of expected exposure, but we were not able to complete a quantitative exposure assessment mainly due to the lack of information on the concentration of the nanomaterial in the products--a problem that regulators and industry will have to address if we are to have realistic exposure assessment in the future. To illustrate the workability of our procedure, we applied it to four product scenarios using the best estimates available and/or worst-case assumptions. Using the best estimates available and/or worst-case assumptions we estimated the consumer exposure to be 26, 15, and 44 microg kg(-1) bw year(-1) for a facial lotion, a fluid product, and a spray product containing nanoparticles, respectively. The application of sun lotion containing 2% nanoparticles result in an exposure of 56.7 mg kg(-1) bw d(-1) for a 2-year-old child, if the amounts applied correspond to the European Commission recommendations on use of sunscreen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18454314     DOI: 10.1007/s10646-008-0210-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicology        ISSN: 0963-9292            Impact factor:   2.823


  1 in total

1.  Principles for characterizing the potential human health effects from exposure to nanomaterials: elements of a screening strategy.

Authors:  Günter Oberdörster; Andrew Maynard; Ken Donaldson; Vincent Castranova; Julie Fitzpatrick; Kevin Ausman; Janet Carter; Barbara Karn; Wolfgang Kreyling; David Lai; Stephen Olin; Nancy Monteiro-Riviere; David Warheit; Hong Yang
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2005-10-06       Impact factor: 9.400

  1 in total
  51 in total

1.  Nanotechnology risk communication past and prologue.

Authors:  Ann Bostrom; Ragnar E Löfstedt
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 4.000

2.  A Granular Bed for Use in a Nanoparticle Respiratory Deposition Sampler.

Authors:  Jae Hong Park; Imali A Mudunkotuwa; Levi W D Mines; T Renée Anthony; Vicki H Grassian; Thomas M Peters
Journal:  Aerosol Sci Technol       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 2.908

3.  A personal nanoparticle respiratory deposition (NRD) sampler.

Authors:  Lorenzo G Cena; T Renée Anthony; Thomas M Peters
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Characterization and control of airborne particles emitted during production of epoxy/carbon nanotube nanocomposites.

Authors:  Lorenzo G Cena; Thomas M Peters
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.155

5.  Nanotechnology and exposure science: what is needed to fill the research and data gaps for consumer products.

Authors:  Paul J Lioy; Yevgen Nazarenko; Tae Won Han; Mary Jean Lioy; Gediminas Mainelis
Journal:  Int J Occup Environ Health       Date:  2010 Oct-Dec

6.  Autophagy and autophagy dysfunction contribute to apoptosis in HepG2 cells exposed to nanosilica.

Authors:  Yongbo Yu; Junchao Duan; Yang Yu; Yang Li; Yang Zou; Yumei Yang; Lizhen Jiang; Qiuling Li; Zhiwei Sun
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 3.524

7.  Cytotoxicity and autophagy dysfunction induced by different sizes of silica particles in human bronchial epithelial BEAS-2B cells.

Authors:  Qiuling Li; Hejing Hu; Lizhen Jiang; Yang Zou; Junchao Duan; Zhiwei Sun
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 3.524

8.  Inactivation of Pure Bacterial Biofilms by Impaction of Aerosolized Consumer Products Containing Nanoparticulate Metals.

Authors:  Jennifer Therkorn; Leonardo Calderon; Benton Cartledge; Nirmala Thomas; Brian Majestic; Gediminas Mainelis
Journal:  Environ Sci Nano       Date:  2018-01-03

Review 9.  Health implications of engineered nanoparticles in infants and children.

Authors:  Song Tang; Mao Wang; Kaylyn E Germ; Hua-Mao Du; Wen-Jie Sun; Wei-Min Gao; Gregory D Mayer
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 2.764

10.  Quantitative determination of skin penetration of PEG-coated CdSe quantum dots in dermabraded but not intact SKH-1 hairless mouse skin.

Authors:  Neera V Gopee; Dean W Roberts; Peggy Webb; Christy R Cozart; Paul H Siitonen; John R Latendresse; Alan R Warbitton; William W Yu; Vicki L Colvin; Nigel J Walker; Paul C Howard
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 4.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.