Literature DB >> 21039707

Nanotechnology risk communication past and prologue.

Ann Bostrom1, Ragnar E Löfstedt.   

Abstract

Nanotechnologies operate at atomic, molecular, and macromolecular scales, at scales where matter behaves differently than at larger scales and quantum effects can dominate. Nanotechnologies have captured the imagination of science fiction writers as science, engineering, and industry have leapt to the challenge of harnessing them. Applications are proliferating. In contrast, despite recent progress the regulatory landscape is not yet coherent, and public awareness of nanotechnology remains low. This has led risk researchers and critics of current nanotechnology risk communication efforts to call for proactive strategies that do more than address facts, that include and go beyond the public participation stipulated by some government acts. A redoubling of nanotechnology risk communication efforts could enable consumer choice and informed public discourse about regulation and public investments in science and safety.
© 2010 Society for Risk Analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21039707      PMCID: PMC3888806          DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01521.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  25 in total

Review 1.  Distribution of sunscreens on skin.

Authors:  J Schulz; H Hohenberg; F Pflücker; E Gärtner; T Will; S Pfeiffer; R Wepf; V Wendel; H Gers-Barlag; K-P Wittern
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2002-11-01       Impact factor: 15.470

2.  What drives public acceptance of nanotechnology?

Authors:  Steven C Currall; Eden B King; Neal Lane; Juan Madera; Stacey Turner
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 39.213

3.  Trends in nanotechnology patents.

Authors:  Hsinchun Chen; Mihail C Roco; Xin Li; Yiling Lin
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 39.213

4.  Health and safety practices in the nanomaterials workplace: results from an international survey.

Authors:  Joseph A Conti; Keith Killpack; Gina Gerritzen; Leia Huang; Maria Mircheva; Magali Delmas; Barbara Herr Harthorn; Richard P Appelbaum; Patricia A Holden
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Perceived risks and perceived benefits of different nanotechnology foods and nanotechnology food packaging.

Authors:  Michael Siegrist; Nathalie Stampfli; Hans Kastenholz; Carmen Keller
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 3.868

6.  Categorization framework to aid exposure assessment of nanomaterials in consumer products.

Authors:  Steffen Foss Hansen; Evan S Michelson; Anja Kamper; Pernille Borling; Frank Stuer-Lauridsen; Anders Baun
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2008-05-03       Impact factor: 2.823

7.  Perceived risk, trust, and the politics of nuclear waste.

Authors:  P Slovic; J H Flynn; M Layman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-12-13       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Salient value similarity, social trust, and risk/benefit perception

Authors: 
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.000

9.  Carbon nanotubes introduced into the abdominal cavity of mice show asbestos-like pathogenicity in a pilot study.

Authors:  Craig A Poland; Rodger Duffin; Ian Kinloch; Andrew Maynard; William A H Wallace; Anthony Seaton; Vicki Stone; Simon Brown; William Macnee; Ken Donaldson
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 39.213

10.  Deliberating the risks of nanotechnologies for energy and health applications in the United States and United Kingdom.

Authors:  Nick Pidgeon; Barbara Herr Harthorn; Karl Bryant; Tee Rogers-Hayden
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2008-12-07       Impact factor: 39.213

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Opportunities and challenges of nanotechnology in the green economy.

Authors:  Ivo Iavicoli; Veruscka Leso; Walter Ricciardi; Laura L Hodson; Mark D Hoover
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 5.984

2.  Comparative analysis of the labelling of nanotechnologies across four stakeholder groups.

Authors:  Adam Capon; James Gillespie; Margaret Rolfe; Wayne Smith
Journal:  J Nanopart Res       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 2.253

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.