Literature DB >> 18451428

Graphical models of residue coupling in protein families.

John Thomas1, Naren Ramakrishnan, Chris Bailey-Kellogg.   

Abstract

Many statistical measures and algorithmic techniques have been proposed for studying residue coupling in protein families. Generally speaking, two residue positions are considered coupled if, in the sequence record, some of their amino acid type combinations are significantly more common than others. While the proposed approaches have proven useful in finding and describing coupling, a significant missing component is a formal probabilistic model that explicates and compactly represents the coupling, integrates information about sequence,structure, and function, and supports inferential procedures for analysis, diagnosis, and prediction.We present an approach to learning and using probabilistic graphical models of residue coupling. These models capture significant conservation and coupling constraints observable ina multiply-aligned set of sequences. Our approach can place a structural prior on considered couplings, so that all identified relationships have direct mechanistic explanations. It can also incorporate information about functional classes, and thereby learn a differential graphical model that distinguishes constraints common to all classes from those unique to individual classes. Such differential models separately account for class-specific conservation and family-wide coupling, two different sources of sequence covariation. They are then able to perform interpretable functional classification of new sequences, explaining classification decisions in terms of the underlying conservation and coupling constraints. We apply our approach in studies of both G protein-coupled receptors and PDZ domains, identifying and analyzing family-wide and class-specific constraints, and performing functional classification. The results demonstrate that graphical models of residue coupling provide a powerful tool for uncovering, representing, and utilizing significant sequence structure-function relationships in protein families.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18451428     DOI: 10.1109/TCBB.2007.70225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform        ISSN: 1545-5963            Impact factor:   3.710


  22 in total

1.  Protein contact prediction by integrating joint evolutionary coupling analysis and supervised learning.

Authors:  Jianzhu Ma; Sheng Wang; Zhiyong Wang; Jinbo Xu
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Synthetic protein alignments by CCMgen quantify noise in residue-residue contact prediction.

Authors:  Susann Vorberg; Stefan Seemayer; Johannes Söding
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 4.475

3.  Assessing the utility of coevolution-based residue-residue contact predictions in a sequence- and structure-rich era.

Authors:  Hetunandan Kamisetty; Sergey Ovchinnikov; David Baker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Identification of family-specific residue packing motifs and their use for structure-based protein function prediction: I. Method development.

Authors:  Deepak Bandyopadhyay; Jun Huan; Jan Prins; Jack Snoeyink; Wei Wang; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2009-06-20       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Optimization of combinatorial mutagenesis.

Authors:  Andrew S Parker; Karl E Griswold; Chris Bailey-Kellogg
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 1.479

6.  Learning sequence determinants of protein:protein interaction specificity with sparse graphical models.

Authors:  Hetunandan Kamisetty; Bornika Ghosh; Christopher James Langmead; Chris Bailey-Kellogg
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 1.479

7.  Evolutionary-guided de novo structure prediction of self-associated transmembrane helical proteins with near-atomic accuracy.

Authors:  Y Wang; P Barth
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  A divide-and-conquer approach to determine the Pareto frontier for optimization of protein engineering experiments.

Authors:  Lu He; Alan M Friedman; Chris Bailey-Kellogg
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-12-16

9.  An evolutionary analysis of cAMP-specific Phosphodiesterase 4 alternative splicing.

Authors:  Keven R Johnson; Jessie Nicodemus-Johnson; Robert S Danziger
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 3.260

Review 10.  Applications of sequence coevolution in membrane protein biochemistry.

Authors:  John M Nicoludis; Rachelle Gaudet
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr       Date:  2017-10-07       Impact factor: 3.747

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.