Literature DB >> 18450615

Outcome measures for orthopaedic interventions on the hip.

E Ashby1, M P W Grocott, F S Haddad.   

Abstract

Orthopaedic outcome measures are used to evaluate the effect of operative interventions. They are used for audit and research. Knowledge of these measures is becoming increasingly important with league tables comparing surgeons and hospitals being made accessible to the profession and the general public. Several types of tool are available to describe outcome after hip surgery such as generic quality-of-life questionnaires, disease-specific quality-of-life questionnaires, hip-specific outcome measures and general short-term clinical measures. We provide an overview of the outcome measures commonly used to evaluate hip interventions.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18450615     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B5.19746

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  14 in total

1.  Are Complications After the Bernese Periacetabular Osteotomy Associated With Subsequent Outcomes Scores?

Authors:  Joel Wells; Perry Schoenecker; Jeff Petrie; Kayla Thomason; Charles W Goss; John C Clohisy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Survivorship of the Bernese Periacetabular Osteotomy: What Factors are Associated with Long-term Failure?

Authors:  Joel Wells; Michael Millis; Young-Jo Kim; Evgeny Bulat; Patricia Miller; Travis Matheney
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Comparison of clinical results and patient's satisfaction between direct anterior approach and Hardinge approach in primary total hip arthroplasty in a community hospital.

Authors:  C Trevisan; R Compagnoni; R Klumpp
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2017-04-27

4.  The development and validation of a more discriminating functional hip score for research.

Authors:  Sujith Konan; Jenni Tahmassebi; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2012-09-21

5.  Oral nutrition or water loading before hip replacement surgery; a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Stefan Ljunggren; Robert G Hahn
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  The effect of posterior and lateral approach on patient-reported outcome measures and physical function in patients with osteoarthritis, undergoing total hip replacement: a randomised controlled trial protocol.

Authors:  Signe Rosenlund; Leif Broeng; Carsten Jensen; Anders Holsgaard-Larsen; Søren Overgaard
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Research methodology for orthopaedic surgeons, with a focus on outcome.

Authors:  Anne Lübbeke
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2018-05-21

8.  5-year clinical and radiographic follow-up of the uncemented Symax hip stem in an international study.

Authors:  Dennis Silvester Maria Gerardus Kruijntjens; Per Kjaersgaard-Andersen; Peter Revald; Jane Schwartz Leonhardt; Jacobus Johannes Chris Arts; René Hendrikus Maria Ten Broeke
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  Process optimized minimally invasive total hip replacement.

Authors:  Philipp Gebel; Markus Oszwald; Bernd Ishaque; Gaffar Ahmed; Recha Blessing; Fritz Thorey; Andreas Ottersbach
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2012-02-13

10.  At discharge gait speed and independence of patients provides a challenges for rehabilitation after total joint arthroplasty: an observational study.

Authors:  Mattia Morri; Emanuela Natali; Daniele Tosarelli
Journal:  Arch Physiother       Date:  2016-06-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.