Anne E Sanders1, Sungwoo Lim, Woosung Sohn. 1. School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, 1011 N University, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1078, USA. aesand@umich.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To better understand the trajectory that propels people from poverty to poor health, we investigated health resilience longitudinally among African American families with incomes below 250% of the federal poverty level. METHODS: Health resilience is the capacity to maintain good health in the face of significant adversity. With higher levels of tooth retention as a marker of health resilience, we used a social-epidemiological framework to define capacity for health resilience through a chain of determinants starting in the built environment (housing quality) and community context (social support) to familial influences (religiosity) and individual mental health and health behavior. RESULTS: Odds of retaining 20 or more teeth were 3 times as likely among adults with resilience versus more-vulnerable adults (odds ratio=3.1; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.3, 7.4). Children of caregivers with resilience had a lower incident rate of noncavitated tooth decay at 18- to 24-month follow-up (incidence risk ratio=0.8; 95% CI=0.7, 0.9) compared with other children. CONCLUSIONS: Health resilience to poverty was supported by protective factors in the built and social environments. When poverty itself cannot be eliminated, improving the quality of the built and social environments will foster resilience to its harmful health effects.
OBJECTIVES: To better understand the trajectory that propels people from poverty to poor health, we investigated health resilience longitudinally among African American families with incomes below 250% of the federal poverty level. METHODS: Health resilience is the capacity to maintain good health in the face of significant adversity. With higher levels of tooth retention as a marker of health resilience, we used a social-epidemiological framework to define capacity for health resilience through a chain of determinants starting in the built environment (housing quality) and community context (social support) to familial influences (religiosity) and individual mental health and health behavior. RESULTS: Odds of retaining 20 or more teeth were 3 times as likely among adults with resilience versus more-vulnerable adults (odds ratio=3.1; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.3, 7.4). Children of caregivers with resilience had a lower incident rate of noncavitated tooth decay at 18- to 24-month follow-up (incidence risk ratio=0.8; 95% CI=0.7, 0.9) compared with other children. CONCLUSIONS: Health resilience to poverty was supported by protective factors in the built and social environments. When poverty itself cannot be eliminated, improving the quality of the built and social environments will foster resilience to its harmful health effects.
Authors: Lynn B Copeland; Elizabeth A Krall; L Jackson Brown; Raul I Garcia; Charles F Streckfus Journal: J Public Health Dent Date: 2004 Impact factor: 1.821
Authors: Barbara Resnick; N Jennifer Klinedinst; Laura Yerges-Armstrong; Jay Magaziner; Denise Orwig; Marc C Hochberg; Ann L Gruber-Baldini; Susan G Dorsey Journal: Int J Orthop Trauma Nurs Date: 2019-03-23
Authors: Shabatun J Islam; Jeong Hwan Kim; Matthew Topel; Chang Liu; Yi-An Ko; Mahasin S Mujahid; Mario Sims; Mohamed Mubasher; Kiran Ejaz; Jan Morgan-Billingslea; Kia Jones; Edmund K Waller; Dean Jones; Karan Uppal; Sandra B Dunbar; Priscilla Pemu; Viola Vaccarino; Charles D Searles; Peter Baltrus; Tené T Lewis; Arshed A Quyyumi; Herman Taylor Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2020-04-28 Impact factor: 5.501