Literature DB >> 18445531

Feedback signals in the caudate reflect goal achievement on a declarative memory task.

Elizabeth Tricomi1, Julie A Fiez.   

Abstract

The striatum has been shown to be a key region in the processing of reward-related information. The head of the caudate nucleus has been implicated in processing performance feedback, or in other words, information about the outcomes of one's actions. However, feedback provides multiple types of information, and it is not clear which of these types of information drive a caudate response. We sought to determine whether the signal in the caudate differed when feedback was informative but only arbitrarily related to performance versus when it provided information about goal achievement. To do this, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to examine caudate activation during a feedback-based paired associate word-learning task. During an initial round of 60 distinct trials, participants chose one of two responses on each trial and received feedback about whether their responses were correct. On the subsequent two rounds, the 60 trials were repeated and participants chose their responses based on their memory of the correct answer. The caudate nuclei were strongly engaged only during the second two rounds, when feedback reflected the accuracy of memory. These results support the idea that feedback-based caudate activation is context dependent: the caudate can be engaged in feedback-based declarative memory tasks, but it is more strongly engaged when feedback is "earned" by performance than when it is informative but not tied to goal achievement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18445531      PMCID: PMC2487673          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.02.066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  66 in total

1.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging activity during the gradual acquisition and expression of paired-associate memory.

Authors:  Jon R Law; Marci A Flanery; Sylvia Wirth; Marianna Yanike; Anne C Smith; Loren M Frank; Wendy A Suzuki; Emery N Brown; Craig E L Stark
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Selective enhancement of associative learning by microstimulation of the anterior caudate.

Authors:  Ziv M Williams; Emad N Eskandar
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-02-26       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Reward-motivated learning: mesolimbic activation precedes memory formation.

Authors:  R Alison Adcock; Arul Thangavel; Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli; Brian Knutson; John D E Gabrieli
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-05-04       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 4.  Dopaminergic modulation of cognitive function-implications for L-DOPA treatment in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Roshan Cools
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 8.989

5.  Robust habit learning in the absence of awareness and independent of the medial temporal lobe.

Authors:  Peter J Bayley; Jennifer C Frascino; Larry R Squire
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-07-28       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  The hippocampal-VTA loop: controlling the entry of information into long-term memory.

Authors:  John E Lisman; Anthony A Grace
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-06-02       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Novelty and familiarity activations in PET studies of memory encoding and retrieval.

Authors:  E Tulving; H J Markowitsch; F E Craik; R Habib; S Houle
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  When artificial grammar acquisition in Parkinson's disease is impaired: the case of learning via trial-by-trial feedback.

Authors:  Jared G Smith; John McDowall
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  A neostriatal habit learning system in humans.

Authors:  B J Knowlton; J A Mangels; L R Squire
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-09-06       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Activity in human reward-sensitive brain areas is strongly context dependent.

Authors:  Sander Nieuwenhuis; Dirk J Heslenfeld; Niels J Alting von Geusau; Rogier B Mars; Clay B Holroyd; Nick Yeung
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-05-01       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  46 in total

1.  Differential neural activity in the recognition of old versus new events: an activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hongkeun Kim
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Neural basis of the undermining effect of monetary reward on intrinsic motivation.

Authors:  Kou Murayama; Madoka Matsumoto; Keise Izuma; Kenji Matsumoto
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Loss of functional specificity in the dorsal striatum of chronic cocaine users.

Authors:  Colleen A Hanlon; Michael J Wesley; Linda J Porrino
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 4.492

4.  Neurobiological responses in the adolescent striatum to being 'tested'.

Authors:  Samantha DePasque; Adriana Galván
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Functional significance of striatal responses during episodic decisions: recovery or goal attainment?

Authors:  Sanghoon Han; Scott A Huettel; Ana Raposo; R Alison Adcock; Ian G Dobbins
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Signed Reward Prediction Errors in the Ventral Striatum Drive Episodic Memory.

Authors:  Cristian B Calderon; Esther De Loof; Kate Ergo; Anna Snoeck; Carsten N Boehler; Tom Verguts
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  Reward-related learning via multiple memory systems.

Authors:  Mauricio R Delgado; Kathryn C Dickerson
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 8.  Striatal contributions to declarative memory retrieval.

Authors:  Jason M Scimeca; David Badre
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Neural signatures of experience-based improvements in deterministic decision-making.

Authors:  Joshua J Tremel; Patryk A Laurent; David A Wolk; Mark E Wheeler; Julie A Fiez
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Striatal outcome processing in healthy aging.

Authors:  Karin M Cox; Howard J Aizenstein; Julie A Fiez
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.282

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.