Literature DB >> 18444759

Spatial memory during progressive disorientation.

Jesse Sargent1, Stephen Dopkins, John Philbeck, Reza Modarres.   

Abstract

Human spatial representations of object locations in a room-sized environment were probed for evidence that the object locations were encoded relative not just to the observer (egocentrically) but also to each other (allocentrically). Participants learned the locations of 4 objects and then were blindfolded and either (a) underwent a succession of 70 degrees and 200 degrees whole-body rotations or (b) were fully disoriented and then underwent a similar sequence of 70 degrees and 200 degrees rotations. After each rotation, participants pointed to the objects without vision. Analyses of the pointing errors suggest that as participants lost orientation, represented object directions generally "drifted" off of their true directions as an ensemble, not in random, unrelated directions. This is interpreted as evidence that object-to-object (allocentric) relationships play a large part in the human spatial updating system. However, there was also some evidence that represented object directions occasionally drifted off of their true directions independently of one another, suggesting a lack of allocentric influence. Implications regarding the interplay of egocentric and allocentric information are considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18444759      PMCID: PMC2883724          DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.3.602

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  23 in total

1.  Allocentric coding of object-to-object relations in overlearned and novel environments.

Authors:  Melinda C Holmes; M Jeanne Sholl
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Geometric determinants of the place fields of hippocampal neurons.

Authors:  J O'Keefe; N Burgess
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-05-30       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Access to knowledge of spatial structure at novel points of observation.

Authors:  J J Rieser
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Spatial updating relies on an egocentric representation of space: effects of the number of objects.

Authors:  Ranxiao Frances Wang; James A Crowell; Daniel J Simons; David E Irwin; Arthur F Kramer; Michael S Ambinder; Laura E Thomas; Jessica L Gosney; Brian R Levinthal; Brendon B Hsieh
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-04

5.  Mental representations of spatial relations.

Authors:  T P McNamara
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Lack of set size effects in spatial updating: Evidence for offline updating.

Authors:  Eric Hodgson; David Waller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Object-array structure, frames of reference, and retrieval of spatial knowledge.

Authors:  R D Easton; M J Sholl
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Simultaneous spatial updating in nested environments.

Authors:  Ranxiao Frances Wang; James R Brockmole
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-12

9.  Updating after rotational and translational body movements: coordinate structure of perspective space.

Authors:  C C Presson; D R Montello
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.490

10.  Orientational manoeuvres in the dark: dissociating allocentric and egocentric influences on spatial memory.

Authors:  Neil Burgess; Hugo J Spiers; Eleni Paleologou
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2004-12
View more
  7 in total

1.  Are allocentric spatial reference frames compatible with theories of Enactivism?

Authors:  Sabine U König; Caspar Goeke; Tobias Meilinger; Peter König
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-08-02

Review 2.  Theories of spatial representations and reference frames: what can configuration errors tell us?

Authors:  Ranxiao Frances Wang
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-08

3.  Chunking in spatial memory.

Authors:  Jesse Sargent; Stephen Dopkins; John Philbeck; David Chichka
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Retrieving enduring spatial representations after disorientation.

Authors:  Xiaoou Li; Weimin Mou; Timothy P McNamara
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2012-06-07

5.  Representations of interobject spatial relations in long-term memory.

Authors:  Björn Rump; Timothy P McNamara
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-02

6.  Use of self-to-object and object-to-object spatial relations in locomotion.

Authors:  Chengli Xiao; Weimin Mou; Timothy P McNamara
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Implicit learning of viewpoint-independent spatial layouts.

Authors:  Taiga Tsuchiai; Kazumichi Matsumiya; Ichiro Kuriki; Satoshi Shioiri
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-06-26
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.