Literature DB >> 15582624

Orientational manoeuvres in the dark: dissociating allocentric and egocentric influences on spatial memory.

Neil Burgess1, Hugo J Spiers, Eleni Paleologou.   

Abstract

Subjects in a darkroom saw an array of five phosphorescent objects on a circular table and, after a short delay, indicated which object had been moved. During the delay the subject, the table or a phosphorescent landmark external to the array was moved (a rotation about the centre of the table) either alone or together. The subject then had to indicate which one of the five objects had been moved. A fully factorial design was used to detect the use of three types of representations of object location: (i) visual snapshots; (ii) egocentric representations updated by self-motion; and (iii) representations relative to the external cue. Improved performance was seen whenever the test array was oriented consistently with any of these stored representations. The influence of representations (i) and (ii) replicates previous work. The influence of representation (iii) is a novel finding which implies that allocentric representations play a role in spatial memory, even over short distances and times. The effect of the external cue was greater when initially experienced as stable. Females out-performed males except when the array was consistent with self-motion but not visual snapshots. These results enable a simple egocentric model of spatial memory to be extended to address large-scale navigation, including the effects of allocentric knowledge, landmark stability and gender.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15582624     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  36 in total

1.  A body-centred frame of reference drives spatial priming in visual search.

Authors:  Keira Ball; Daniel Smith; Amanda Ellison; Thomas Schenk
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Building a cognitive map by assembling multiple path integration systems.

Authors:  Ranxiao Frances Wang
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-06

3.  Where am I now? Distinct roles for parahippocampal and retrosplenial cortices in place recognition.

Authors:  Russell A Epstein; Whitney E Parker; Alana M Feiler
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Theories of spatial representations and reference frames: what can configuration errors tell us?

Authors:  Ranxiao Frances Wang
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-08

5.  Chunking in spatial memory.

Authors:  Jesse Sargent; Stephen Dopkins; John Philbeck; David Chichka
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Spatial reasoning in Tenejapan Mayans.

Authors:  Peggy Li; Linda Abarbanell; Lila Gleitman; Anna Papafragou
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2011-04-08

7.  Cognitive cladistics and cultural override in Hominid spatial cognition.

Authors:  Daniel B M Haun; Christian J Rapold; Josep Call; Gabriele Janzen; Stephen C Levinson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Novel-view scene recognition relies on identifying spatial reference directions.

Authors:  Weimin Mou; Hui Zhang; Timothy P McNamara
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2009-03-17

9.  Analogue versus propositional representation in congenitally blind individuals.

Authors:  Piers Fleming; Linden J Ball; Thomas C Ormerod; Alan F Collins
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-12

10.  A multisensory approach to spatial updating: the case of mental rotations.

Authors:  Manuel Vidal; Alexandre Lehmann; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-21       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.