Literature DB >> 18444751

On the additive effects of stimulus quality and word frequency in lexical decision: evidence for opposing interactive influences revealed by RT distributional analyses.

Melvin J Yap1, David A Balota, Chi-Shing Tse, Derek Besner.   

Abstract

The joint effects of stimulus quality and word frequency in lexical decision were examined in 4 experiments as a function of nonword type (legal nonwords, e.g., BRONE, vs. pseudohomophones, e.g., BRANE). When familiarity was a viable dimension for word-nonword discrimination, as when legal nonwords were used, additive effects of stimulus quality and word frequency were observed in both means and distributional characteristics of the response-time distributions. In contrast, when the utility of familiarity was undermined by using pseudohomophones, additivity was observed in the means but not in distributional characteristics. Specifically, opposing interactive effects in the underlying distribution were observed, producing apparent additivity in means. These findings are consistent with the suggestion that, when familiarity is deemphasized in lexical decision, cascaded processing between letter and word levels is in play, whereas, when familiarity is a viable dimension for word-nonword discrimination, processing is discrete.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18444751     DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.3.495

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  27 in total

1.  Using prediction markets to estimate the reproducibility of scientific research.

Authors:  Anna Dreber; Thomas Pfeiffer; Johan Almenberg; Siri Isaksson; Brad Wilson; Yiling Chen; Brian A Nosek; Magnus Johannesson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Distributional effects of word frequency on eye fixation durations.

Authors:  Adrian Staub; Sarah J White; Denis Drieghe; Elizabeth C Hollway; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Does the familiarity bias hypothesis explain why there is no masked priming for "NO" decisions?

Authors:  Sachiko Kinoshita; Dennis Norris
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-02

4.  Conflict resolved: On the role of spatial attention in reading and color naming tasks.

Authors:  Serje Robidoux; Derek Besner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-12

5.  Semantic richness effects in lexical decision: The role of feedback.

Authors:  Melvin J Yap; Gail Y Lim; Penny M Pexman
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-11

6.  Modulation of additive and interactive effects by trial history revisited.

Authors:  Michael E J Masson; Maximilian M Rabe; Reinhold Kliegl
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-04

7.  Individual differences in visual word recognition: insights from the English Lexicon Project.

Authors:  Melvin J Yap; David A Balota; Daragh E Sibley; Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-07-04       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  The semantic Stroop effect: An ex-Gaussian analysis.

Authors:  Darcy White; Evan F Risko; Derek Besner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

9.  The location-, word-, and arrow-based Simon effects: An ex-Gaussian analysis.

Authors:  Chunming Luo; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-04

10.  Dispersion of response times reveals cognitive dynamics.

Authors:  John G Holden; Guy C Van Orden; Michael T Turvey
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 8.934

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.