Literature DB >> 19348544

Dispersion of response times reveals cognitive dynamics.

John G Holden1, Guy C Van Orden, Michael T Turvey.   

Abstract

Trial-to-trial variation in word-pronunciation times exhibits 1/f scaling. One explanation is that human performances are consequent on multiplicative interactions among interdependent processes-interaction dominant dynamics. This article describes simulated distributions of pronunciation times in a further test for multiplicative interactions and interdependence. Individual participant distributions of approximately 1,100 word-pronunciation times were successfully mimicked for each participant in combinations of lognormal and power-law behavior. Successful hazard function simulations generalized these results to establish interaction dominant dynamics, in contrast with component dominant dynamics, as a likely mechanism for cognitive activity. (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19348544      PMCID: PMC3730291          DOI: 10.1037/a0014849

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rev        ISSN: 0033-295X            Impact factor:   8.934


  37 in total

Review 1.  Cognitive emissions of 1/f noise.

Authors:  D L Gilden
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  The ex-Wald distribution as a descriptive model of response times.

Authors:  W Schwarz
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2001-11

3.  Truth and consequences of ordinal differences in statistical distributions: toward a theory of hierarchical inference.

Authors:  J T Townsend
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Subitizing: magical numbers or mere superstition?

Authors:  J D Balakrishnan; F G Ashby
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1992

5.  Human cognition and a pile of sand: a discussion on serial correlations and self-organized criticality.

Authors:  Eric-Jan Wagenmakers; Simon Farrell; Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2005-02

6.  The dynamics of perception and action.

Authors:  William H Warren
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Individual differences in components of reaction time distributions and their relations to working memory and intelligence.

Authors:  Florian Schmiedek; Klaus Oberauer; Oliver Wilhelm; Heinz-Martin Süss; Werner W Wittmann
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2007-08

8.  Annotation: the analysis of variance and the analysis of causes.

Authors:  R C Lewontin
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Converging evidence for domain-specific slowing from multiple nonlexical tasks and multiple analytic methods.

Authors:  S Hale; J Myerson; M Faust; N Fristoe
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.077

10.  Risks of drawing inferences about cognitive processes from model fits to individual versus average performance.

Authors:  W K Estes; W Todd Maddox
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-06
View more
  35 in total

1.  Patterns of interaction-dominant dynamics in individual versus collaborative memory foraging.

Authors:  Janelle Szary; Rick Dale; Christopher T Kello; Theo Rhodes
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2015-08-28

2.  Interaction between intention and environmental constraints on the fractal dynamics of human performance.

Authors:  Auriel Washburn; Charles A Coey; Veronica Romero; MaryLauren Malone; Michael J Richardson
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2015-04-22

3.  Strong anticipation: complexity matching in interpersonal coordination.

Authors:  Vivien Marmelat; Didier Delignières
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-08-04       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Complexity matching and coordination in individual and dyadic performance.

Authors:  Daniel S Schloesser; Christopher T Kello; Vivien Marmelat
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 2.161

5.  An interaction-dominant perspective on reading fluency and dyslexia.

Authors:  M L Wijnants; F Hasselman; R F A Cox; A M T Bosman; G Van Orden
Journal:  Ann Dyslexia       Date:  2012-03-30

6.  Farey Trees Explain Sequential Effects in Choice Response Time.

Authors:  Colin T Annand; Sheila M Fleming; John G Holden
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  Complex Systems Research and Evaluation in Engineering Education.

Authors:  Jonathan C Hilpert; Gwen C Marchand
Journal:  Annu Conf Expo (Am Soc Eng Educ)       Date:  2017

8.  A demonstration of the transition from ready-to-hand to unready-to-hand.

Authors:  Dobromir G Dotov; Lin Nie; Anthony Chemero
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Interactions dominate the dynamics of visual cognition.

Authors:  Damian G Stephen; Daniel Mirman
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-01-13

10.  Eye movement dynamics and cognitive self-organization in typical and atypical development.

Authors:  Daniel Mirman; Julia R Irwin; Damian G Stephen
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 5.082

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.