Literature DB >> 18442869

Etoposide pharmacokinetics and survival in patients with small cell lung cancer: a multicentre study.

Benoit You1, Brigitte Tranchand, Pascal Girard, Claire Falandry, Benjamin Ribba, Sylvie Chabaud, Pierre-Jean Souquet, Isabelle Court-Fortune, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Cécile Fournel, Michel Tod, Gilles Freyer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the prognostic value of systemic exposure to etoposide (Area Under the concentration Curve (AUC(VP16))) on overall survival (OS) in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from 52 patients with limited stage (n=17) or metastatic (n=35) SCLC were analysed. They received at least two courses of etoposide (120mg/(m(2)day) on 3 days) combined with either doxorubicin-ifosfamide (AVI, n=29) or platinum compounds (carboplatin: n=16; cisplatin: n=7). Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) study was performed using NON-linear Mixed Effect Model (NONMEM) and Splus software with univariate and multivariate analyses.
RESULTS: Etoposide plasma concentration vs. time was described by a two compartment model. Etoposide clearance (CL) was significantly dependant on serum creatinine (Scr). Ifosfamide (IFO) coadministration increased etoposide clearance by 28% (median CL(VP16): 2.42L/h vs. 1.89L/h, p<0.0005) leading to a reduced systemic exposure (median AUC(VP16): 260mgh/L vs. 339mgh/L). No influence of body surface area (BSA) on CL(VP16) was observed. Median percent decrease of absolute neutrophil count (ANC) after the first chemotherapy course was greater when etoposide 24h concentration was above 0.33mg/L (88% vs. 0%, p=0.028). Median OS was significantly longer in patients treated without ifosfamide (11.0 months vs. 7.0 months, p=0.049) and in patients with CL(VP16)<2.22L/h (14 months vs. 7 months, p=0.013) and AUC(VP16)>254.8mgh/L (11 months vs. 7 months, p=0.048). The independent prognostic factors regarding OS were LDH, CL(VP16) and AUC(VP16).
CONCLUSION: In this study it was found that CL(VP16) is reduced in patients with elevated serum creatinine, whilst ifosfamide coadministration increases CL(VP16) and reduces AUC(VP16), demonstrating the interaction between VP16 and ifosfamide. CL(VP16) and AUC(VP16) correlate significantly with overall survival of patients with SCLC patients receiving etoposide regimens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18442869     DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2008.03.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lung Cancer        ISSN: 0169-5002            Impact factor:   5.705


  13 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacodynamic models for discrete data.

Authors:  Ines Paule; Pascal Girard; Gilles Freyer; Michel Tod
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Perspectives on tissue interactions in development and disease.

Authors:  D W Strand; O E Franco; D Basanta; A R A Anderson; S W Hayward
Journal:  Curr Mol Med       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.222

3.  A phase I study of AT-101 with cisplatin and etoposide in patients with advanced solid tumors with an expanded cohort in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  William R Schelman; Tabraiz A Mohammed; Anne M Traynor; Jill M Kolesar; Rebecca M Marnocha; Jens Eickhoff; Michael Keppen; Dona B Alberti; George Wilding; Naoko Takebe; Glenn Liu
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 3.850

4.  A population pharmacodynamic model for lactate dehydrogenase and neuron specific enolase to predict tumor progression in small cell lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Núria Buil-Bruna; José-María López-Picazo; Marta Moreno-Jiménez; Salvador Martín-Algarra; Benjamin Ribba; Iñaki F Trocóniz
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 4.009

5.  Serum lactate dehydrogenase and survival following cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Wahyu Wulaningsih; Lars Holmberg; Hans Garmo; Håkan Malmstrom; Mats Lambe; Niklas Hammar; Göran Walldius; Ingmar Jungner; Tony Ng; Mieke Van Hemelrijck
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Oral treatment with etoposide in small cell lung cancer - dilemmas and solutions.

Authors:  Renata Rezonja; Lea Knez; Tanja Cufer; Ales Mrhar
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 2.991

7.  The in vitro sustained release profile and antitumor effect of etoposide-layered double hydroxide nanohybrids.

Authors:  Lili Qin; Mei Wang; Rongrong Zhu; Songhui You; Ping Zhou; Shilong Wang
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2013-05-24

Review 8.  Inorganic nanolayers: structure, preparation, and biomedical applications.

Authors:  Bullo Saifullah; Mohd Zobir B Hussein
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2015-09-02

9.  Identifying Malignant Pleural Effusion by A Cancer Ratio (Serum LDH: Pleural Fluid ADA Ratio).

Authors:  Akash Verma; John Abisheganaden; R W Light
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 2.584

10.  Pharmacokinetics and dose adjustment of etoposide administered in a medium-dose etoposide, cyclophosphamide and total body irradiation regimen before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Yuki Tazawa; Akio Shigematsu; Kumiko Kasashi; Junichi Sugita; Tomoyuki Endo; Takeshi Kondo; Takanori Teshima; Ken Iseki; Mitsuru Sugawara; Yoh Takekuma
Journal:  J Pharm Health Care Sci       Date:  2016-08-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.