Literature DB >> 18442767

In support of the ACR Appropriateness Criteria.

Christopher Lee Sistrom1.   

Abstract

The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria were recently revised and translated into a new electronic format searchable online. They are also now being used as the basis for decision support logic underlying computerized radiology order entry. This article addresses some previous criticisms of the structure and output of the American College of Radiology expert panel process. Although there is certainly room for improvement, the conceptual framework and methodology underlying the appropriateness criteria are sound and do not need to be drastically altered.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18442767     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2007.12.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  7 in total

1.  Sensitivity and specificity: imperfect predictors of guideline utility in radiology.

Authors:  B Roudsari; C McKinney; D Moore; J Jarvik
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Cancer risks associated with external radiation from diagnostic imaging procedures.

Authors:  Martha S Linet; Thomas L Slovis; Donald L Miller; Ruth Kleinerman; Choonsik Lee; Preetha Rajaraman; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 3.  The impact of computerized provider order entry systems on medical-imaging services: a systematic review.

Authors:  Andrew Georgiou; Mirela Prgomet; Andrew Markewycz; Edwina Adams; Johanna I Westbrook
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 4.  Current and future trends in imaging informatics for oncology.

Authors:  Mia A Levy; Daniel L Rubin
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.360

5.  Appropriate Use Criteria for Somatostatin Receptor PET Imaging in Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Authors:  Thomas A Hope; Emily K Bergsland; Murat Fani Bozkurt; Michael Graham; Anthony P Heaney; Ken Herrmann; James R Howe; Matthew H Kulke; Pamela L Kunz; Josh Mailman; Lawrence May; David C Metz; Corina Millo; Sue O'Dorisio; Diane L Reidy-Lagunes; Michael C Soulen; Jonathan R Strosberg
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Appropriate Use Criteria for Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET Imaging.

Authors:  Hossein Jadvar; Jeremie Calais; Stefano Fanti; Felix Feng; Kirsten L Greene; James L Gulley; Michael Hofman; Bridget F Koontz; Daniel W Lin; Michael J Morris; Steve P Rowe; Trevor J Royce; Simpa Salami; Bital Savir-Baruch; Sandy Srinivas; Thomas A Hope
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 11.082

Review 7.  Imaging challenges: a US perspective on controlling exposure to ionizing radiation in children with cancer.

Authors:  Sue C Kaste
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2008-12-16
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.