BACKGROUND: Computerized provider order entry (CPOE) systems have been strongly promoted as a means to improve the quality and efficiency of healthcare. METHODS: This systematic review aimed to assess the evidence of the impact of CPOE on medical-imaging services and patient outcomes. RESULTS: Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria, most of which (10/14) used a pre-/postintervention comparison design. Eight studies demonstrated benefits, such as decreased test utilization, associated with decision-support systems promoting adherence to test ordering guidelines. Three studies evaluating medical-imaging ordering and reporting times showed statistically significant decreases in turnaround times. CONCLUSIONS: The findings reveal the potential for CPOE to contribute to significant efficiency and effectiveness gains in imaging services. The diversity and scope of the research evidence can be strengthened through increased attention to the circumstances and mechanisms that contribute to the success (or otherwise) of CPOE and its contribution to the enhancement of patient care delivery.
BACKGROUND: Computerized provider order entry (CPOE) systems have been strongly promoted as a means to improve the quality and efficiency of healthcare. METHODS: This systematic review aimed to assess the evidence of the impact of CPOE on medical-imaging services and patient outcomes. RESULTS: Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria, most of which (10/14) used a pre-/postintervention comparison design. Eight studies demonstrated benefits, such as decreased test utilization, associated with decision-support systems promoting adherence to test ordering guidelines. Three studies evaluating medical-imaging ordering and reporting times showed statistically significant decreases in turnaround times. CONCLUSIONS: The findings reveal the potential for CPOE to contribute to significant efficiency and effectiveness gains in imaging services. The diversity and scope of the research evidence can be strengthened through increased attention to the circumstances and mechanisms that contribute to the success (or otherwise) of CPOE and its contribution to the enhancement of patient care delivery.
Authors: Hagop S Mekhjian; Rajee R Kumar; Lynn Kuehn; Thomas D Bentley; Phyllis Teater; Andrew Thomas; Beth Payne; Asif Ahmad Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2002 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Johanna I Westbrook; Jeffrey Braithwaite; Andrew Georgiou; Amanda Ampt; Nerida Creswick; Enrico Coiera; Rick Iedema Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2007-08-21 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Caroline Lubick Goldzweig; Ali Towfigh; Margaret Maglione; Paul G Shekelle Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2009-01-27 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Andrew Georgiou; Amanda Ampt; Nerida Creswick; Johanna I Westbrook; Jeffrey Braithwaite Journal: Int J Med Inform Date: 2008-11-17 Impact factor: 4.046
Authors: Daniel I Rosenthal; Jeffrey B Weilburg; Thomas Schultz; Janet C Miller; Victoria Nixon; Keith J Dreyer; James H Thrall Journal: J Am Coll Radiol Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 5.532
Authors: George A Gellert; Linda Catzoela; Lajja Patel; Kylynn Bruner; Felix Friedman; Ricardo Ramirez; Lilliana Saucedo; S Luke Webster; John A Gillean Journal: Perspect Health Inf Manag Date: 2017-04-01
Authors: Michael C Brunner; Scott E Sheehan; Eric M Yanke; Dean F Sittig; Nasia Safdar; Barbara Hill; Kenneth S Lee; John F Orwin; David J Vanness; Christopher J Hildebrand; Michael A Bruno; Timothy J Erickson; Ryan Zea; D Paul Moberg Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2020-02-19 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: G A Gellert; V Hill; K Bruner; G Maciaz; L Saucedo; L Catzoela; R Ramirez; W J Jacobs; P Nguyen; L Patel; S L Webster Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2015-12-02 Impact factor: 2.342