Literature DB >> 18442122

Comparative effects of scaffold pore size, pore volume, and total void volume on cranial bone healing patterns using microsphere-based scaffolds.

Caren E Petrie Aronin1, Karim W Sadik, Ann L Lay, Dave B Rion, Sunil S Tholpady, Roy C Ogle, Edward A Botchwey.   

Abstract

Bony craniofacial deficits resulting from injury, disease, or birth defects remain a considerable clinical challenge. In this study, microsphere-based scaffold fabrication methods were use to study the respective effects of scaffold pore size, open pore volume, and total void volume fraction on osseous tissue infiltration and bone regeneration in a critical size rat cranial defect. To compare the healing effects of these parameters, three different scaffolds types were fabricated: solid 100 microm spheres, solid 500 microm spheres, and hollow 500 microm spheres. These constructs were implanted into surgically created rat calvarial defects. By 90-days post op, results of micro computed tomography (CT) analysis showed that all scaffolds generated similar amounts of new bone which was significantly greater than untreated controls. Interestingly, the spatial distribution of new bone within the defect area varied by scaffold group. MicroCT and histological analysis demonstrated healing restricted to the dural side in the hollow 500 microm group, whereas the solid 500 microm group demonstrated healing along the dural side and within the center of the defect. Solid 100 microm groups demonstrated healing along the dural layer, periosteal layer, and within the center of the defect. These results suggest that pore size and closed void volume may both play important roles in scaffold degradation patterns and associated bone healing. 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18442122      PMCID: PMC3122961          DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.32015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A        ISSN: 1549-3296            Impact factor:   4.396


  26 in total

1.  Effects of geometry of hydroxyapatite as a cell substratum in BMP-induced ectopic bone formation.

Authors:  Q M Jin; H Takita; T Kohgo; K Atsumi; H Itoh; Y Kuboki
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  2000-09-05

2.  Tissue engineered microsphere-based matrices for bone repair: design and evaluation.

Authors:  Mark Borden; Mohamed Attawia; Yusuf Khan; Cato T Laurencin
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 12.479

3.  Regional dura mater differentially regulates osteoblast gene expression.

Authors:  Stephen M Warren; Joshua A Greenwald; Randall P Nacamuli; Kenton D Fong; Han Joon M Song; Tony D Fang; Jonathan A Mathy; Michael T Longaker
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.046

4.  Characterization of matrix-induced osteogenesis in rat calvarial bone defects: II. Origins of bone-forming cells.

Authors:  J Wang; M J Glimcher
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Geometry of carriers controlling phenotypic expression in BMP-induced osteogenesis and chondrogenesis.

Authors:  Y Kuboki; Q Jin; H Takita
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Degradation behaviors of biodegradable macroporous scaffolds prepared by gas foaming of effervescent salts.

Authors:  J J Yoon; T G Park
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  2001-06-05

7.  Morphological characterization of microspheres, films and implants prepared from poly(lactide-co-glycolide) and ABA triblock copolymers: is the erosion controlled by degradation, swelling or diffusion?

Authors:  C Witt; T Kissel
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Biopharm       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.571

8.  Age-dependent changes in material properties of the brain and braincase of the rat.

Authors:  Amit Gefen; Nurit Gefen; Qiliang Zhu; Ramesh Raghupathi; Susan S Margulies
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.269

9.  Hepatic osteodystrophy in rats results mainly from portasystemic shunting.

Authors:  S W van der Merwe; J B van den Bogaerde; C Goosen; F F Maree; R J Milner; C M Schnitzler; A Biscardi; J M Mesquita; G Engelbrecht; D Kahn; J Fevery
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Osteogenesis in calvarial defects: contribution of the dura, the pericranium, and the surrounding bone in adult versus infant animals.

Authors:  Arun K Gosain; Timothy D Santoro; Lian-Sheng Song; Christopher C Capel; P V Sudhakar; Hani S Matloub
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.730

View more
  21 in total

1.  Osteochondral interface tissue engineering using macroscopic gradients of bioactive signals.

Authors:  Nathan H Dormer; Milind Singh; Limin Wang; Cory J Berkland; Michael S Detamore
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 2.  Stereolithographic bone scaffold design parameters: osteogenic differentiation and signal expression.

Authors:  Kyobum Kim; Andrew Yeatts; David Dean; John P Fisher
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 6.389

3.  Biodegradable composite scaffolds incorporating an intramedullary rod and delivering bone morphogenetic protein-2 for stabilization and bone regeneration in segmental long bone defects.

Authors:  A M Henslee; P P Spicer; D M Yoon; M B Nair; V V Meretoja; K E Witherel; J A Jansen; A G Mikos; F K Kasper
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 8.947

4.  Design of porous polymeric scaffolds by gas foaming of heterogeneous blends.

Authors:  A Salerno; M Oliviero; E Di Maio; S Iannace; P A Netti
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2009-05-09       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Extremely small-magnitude accelerations enhance bone regeneration: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Soon Jung Hwang; Svetlana Lublinsky; Young-Kwon Seo; In Sook Kim; Stefan Judex
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  FTY720 promotes local microvascular network formation and regeneration of cranial bone defects.

Authors:  Caren E Petrie Aronin; Lauren S Sefcik; Sunil S Tholpady; Ashok Tholpady; Karim W Sadik; Timothy L Macdonald; Shayn M Peirce; Brian R Wamhoff; Kevin R Lynch; Roy C Ogle; Edward A Botchwey
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.845

7.  Homogenous scaffold-based cranial/skull implant modelling and structural analysis-unit cell algorithm-meshless approach.

Authors:  V Phanindra Bogu; Y Ravi Kumar; Asit Kumar Khanra
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  Dura mater stimulates human adipose-derived stromal cells to undergo bone formation in mouse calvarial defects.

Authors:  Benjamin Levi; Emily R Nelson; Shuli Li; Aaron W James; Jeong S Hyun; Daniel T Montoro; Min Lee; Jason P Glotzbach; George W Commons; Michael T Longaker
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 6.277

9.  Subcritical CO2 sintering of microspheres of different polymeric materials to fabricate scaffolds for tissue engineering.

Authors:  Manjari Bhamidipati; BanuPriya Sridharan; Aaron M Scurto; Michael S Detamore
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 7.328

10.  Oxygen-tension controlled matrices for enhanced osteogenic cell survival and performance.

Authors:  A R Amini; S P Nukavarapu
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 3.934

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.