Literature DB >> 18441414

Partial volume effect correction in PET using regularized iterative deconvolution with variance control based on local topology.

A S Kirov1, J Z Piao, C R Schmidtlein.   

Abstract

Correcting positron emission tomography (PET) images for the partial volume effect (PVE) due to the limited resolution of PET has been a long-standing challenge. Various approaches including incorporation of the system response function in the reconstruction have been previously tested. We present a post-reconstruction PVE correction based on iterative deconvolution using a 3D maximum likelihood expectation-maximization (MLEM) algorithm. To achieve convergence we used a one step late (OSL) regularization procedure based on the assumption of local monotonic behavior of the PET signal following Alenius et al. This technique was further modified to selectively control variance depending on the local topology of the PET image. No prior 'anatomic' information is needed in this approach. An estimate of the noise properties of the image is used instead. The procedure was tested for symmetric and isotropic deconvolution functions with Gaussian shape and full width at half-maximum (FWHM) ranging from 6.31 mm to infinity. The method was applied to simulated and experimental scans of the NEMA NU 2 image quality phantom with the GE Discovery LS PET/CT scanner. The phantom contained uniform activity spheres with diameters ranging from 1 cm to 3.7 cm within uniform background. The optimal sphere activity to variance ratio was obtained when the deconvolution function was replaced by a step function few voxels wide. In this case, the deconvolution method converged in approximately 3-5 iterations for most points on both the simulated and experimental images. For the 1 cm diameter sphere, the contrast recovery improved from 12% to 36% in the simulated and from 21% to 55% in the experimental data. Recovery coefficients between 80% and 120% were obtained for all larger spheres, except for the 13 mm diameter sphere in the simulated scan (68%). No increase in variance was observed except for a few voxels neighboring strong activity gradients and inside the largest spheres. Testing the method for patient images increased the visibility of small lesions in non-uniform background and preserved the overall image quality. Regularized iterative deconvolution with variance control based on the local properties of the PET image and on estimated image noise is a promising approach for partial volume effect corrections in PET.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18441414     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/10/009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  22 in total

1.  An MR image-guided, voxel-based partial volume correction method for PET images.

Authors:  Hesheng Wang; Baowei Fei
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Evaluation of a 3D local multiresolution algorithm for the correction of partial volume effects in positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Adrien Le Pogam; Mathieu Hatt; Patrice Descourt; Nicolas Boussion; Charalampos Tsoumpas; Federico E Turkheimer; Caroline Prunier-Aesch; Jean-Louis Baulieu; Denis Guilloteau; Dimitris Visvikis
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Evaluation of the spatial dependence of the point spread function in 2D PET image reconstruction using LOR-OSEM.

Authors:  D Wiant; J A Gersh; M Bennett; J D Bourland
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Noise propagation in resolution modeled PET imaging and its impact on detectability.

Authors:  Arman Rahmim; Jing Tang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 5.  Resolution modeling in PET imaging: theory, practice, benefits, and pitfalls.

Authors:  Arman Rahmim; Jinyi Qi; Vesna Sossi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Joint solution for PET image segmentation, denoising, and partial volume correction.

Authors:  Ziyue Xu; Mingchen Gao; Georgios Z Papadakis; Brian Luna; Sanjay Jain; Daniel J Mollura; Ulas Bagci
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 8.545

7.  Classification and evaluation strategies of auto-segmentation approaches for PET: Report of AAPM task group No. 211.

Authors:  Mathieu Hatt; John A Lee; Charles R Schmidtlein; Issam El Naqa; Curtis Caldwell; Elisabetta De Bernardi; Wei Lu; Shiva Das; Xavier Geets; Vincent Gregoire; Robert Jeraj; Michael P MacManus; Osama R Mawlawi; Ursula Nestle; Andrei B Pugachev; Heiko Schöder; Tony Shepherd; Emiliano Spezi; Dimitris Visvikis; Habib Zaidi; Assen S Kirov
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 8.  PET/MRI for neurologic applications.

Authors:  Ciprian Catana; Alexander Drzezga; Wolf-Dieter Heiss; Bruce R Rosen
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 9.  Advances in PET/MR instrumentation and image reconstruction.

Authors:  Jorge Cabello; Sibylle I Ziegler
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  A method for partial volume correction of PET-imaged tumor heterogeneity using expectation maximization with a spatially varying point spread function.

Authors:  David L Barbee; Ryan T Flynn; James E Holden; Robert J Nickles; Robert Jeraj
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.