Literature DB >> 18439045

Interlaboratory comparison of the dicentric chromosome assay for radiation biodosimetry in mass casualty events.

Ruth C Wilkins1, Horst Romm, Tzu-Cheg Kao, Akio A Awa, Mitsuaki A Yoshida, Gordon K Livingston, Mark S Jenkins, Ursula Oestreicher, Terry C Pellmar, Pataje G S Prasanna.   

Abstract

This interlaboratory comparison validates the dicentric chromosome assay for assessing radiation dose in mass casualty accidents and identifies the advantages and limitations of an international biodosimetry network. The assay's validity and accuracy were determined among five laboratories following the International Organization for Standardization guidelines. Blood samples irradiated at the Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute were shipped to all laboratories, which constructed individual radiation calibration curves and assessed the dose to dose-blinded samples. Each laboratory constructed a dose-effect calibration curve for the yield of dicentrics for (60)Co gamma rays in the 0 to 5-Gy range, using the maximum likelihood linear-quadratic model, Y = c + alphaD + betaD(2). For all laboratories, the estimated coefficients of the fitted curves were within the 99.7% confidence intervals (CIs), but the observed dicentric yields differed. When each laboratory assessed radiation doses to four dose-blinded blood samples by comparing the observed dicentric yield with the laboratory's own calibration curve, the estimates were accurate in all laboratories at all doses. For all laboratories, actual doses were within the 99.75% CI for the assessed dose. Across the dose range, the error in the estimated doses, compared to the physical doses, ranged from 15% underestimation to 15% overestimation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18439045     DOI: 10.1667/RR1272.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  20 in total

Review 1.  Current status of biodosimetry based on standard cytogenetic methods.

Authors:  Marcela Maria Pereira de Lemos Pinto; Neyliane Frassinetti Gonçalves Santos; Ademir Amaral
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  A new biodosimetric method: branched DNA-based quantitative detection of B1 DNA in mouse plasma.

Authors:  L Zhang; M Zhang; S Yang; Y Cao; S Bingrong Zhang; L Yin; Y Tian; Y Ma; A Zhang; P Okunieff; L Zhang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Local, regional and national responses for medical management of a radiological/nuclear incident.

Authors:  Nicholas Dainiak; Beata Skudlarska; Joseph Albanese
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 2.658

4.  Biological Dosimetry by the Triage Dicentric Chromosome Assay - Further validation of International Networking.

Authors:  Ruth C Wilkins; Horst Romm; Ursula Oestreicher; Leonora Marro; Mitsuaki A Yoshida; Y Suto; Pataje G S Prasanna
Journal:  Radiat Meas       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 1.898

Review 5.  Literature review and global consensus on management of acute radiation syndrome affecting nonhematopoietic organ systems.

Authors:  Nicholas Dainiak; Robert Nicolas Gent; Zhanat Carr; Rita Schneider; Judith Bader; Elena Buglova; Nelson Chao; C Norman Coleman; Arnold Ganser; Claude Gorin; Martin Hauer-Jensen; L Andrew Huff; Patricia Lillis-Hearne; Kazuhiko Maekawa; Jeffrey Nemhauser; Ray Powles; Holger Schünemann; Alla Shapiro; Leif Stenke; Nelson Valverde; David Weinstock; Douglas White; Joseph Albanese; Viktor Meineke
Journal:  Disaster Med Public Health Prep       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 1.385

6.  Web-based scoring of the dicentric assay, a collaborative biodosimetric scoring strategy for population triage in large scale radiation accidents.

Authors:  H Romm; E Ainsbury; A Bajinskis; S Barnard; J F Barquinero; L Barrios; C Beinke; R Puig-Casanovas; M Deperas-Kaminska; E Gregoire; U Oestreicher; C Lindholm; J Moquet; K Rothkamm; S Sommer; H Thierens; A Vral; V Vandersickel; A Wojcik
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 1.925

7.  Delayed mitogenic stimulation decreases DNA damage assessed by micronucleus assay in human peripheral blood lymphocytes after (60)co irradiation.

Authors:  G Tamizh Selvan; M Bhavani; J Vijayalakshmi; F D Paul Solomon; N K Chaudhury; P Venkatachalam
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 8.  Mitigating the risk of radiation-induced cancers: limitations and paradigms in drug development.

Authors:  Stephen S Yoo; Timothy J Jorgensen; Ann R Kennedy; John D Boice; Alla Shapiro; Tom C-C Hu; Brian R Moyer; Marcy B Grace; Gary J Kelloff; Michael Fenech; Pataje G S Prasanna; C Norman Coleman
Journal:  J Radiol Prot       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 1.394

9.  The RABIT: a rapid automated biodosimetry tool for radiological triage.

Authors:  Guy Garty; Youhua Chen; Alessio Salerno; Helen Turner; Jian Zhang; Oleksandra Lyulko; Antonella Bertucci; Yanping Xu; Hongliang Wang; Nabil Simaan; Gerhard Randers-Pehrson; Y Lawrence Yao; Sally A Amundson; David J Brenner
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.316

10.  Differential radio-sensitivities of human chromosomes 1 and 2 in one donor in interphase- and metaphase-spreads after 60Co gamma-irradiation.

Authors:  Rupak Pathak; Adarsh Ramakumar; Uma Subramanian; Pataje G S Prasanna
Journal:  BMC Med Phys       Date:  2009-06-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.