Literature DB >> 8878501

Electrophysiologic assessments in pudendal and sacral motor nerves after ileal J-pouch-anal anastomosis for patients with ulcerative colitis and adenomatosis coli.

R Tomita1, Y Kurosu, K Munakata.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To clarify neurologic function with respect to external anal sphincter and puborectalis muscles after J configuration ileal J-pouch-anal anastomosis for patients with ulcerative colitis and adenomatosis coli, we examined the terminal motor latency in the pudendal and sacral motor nerve (S2-4).
METHODS: Latency of the response in the external anal sphincter muscle following digitally directed transrectal pudendal nerve stimulation (PNTML) and in the puborectalis muscle following transcutaneous magnetic stimulation of the cauda equina at the levels S2-4 (SMNLTSS) were measured in 12 patients with ileal J-pouch-anal anastomosis; they were divided into a group with continence (7 cases) and a group with soiling (5 cases). Results were compared with data obtained from 12 patients before operation and 15 controls.
RESULTS: Conduction delay of PNTML and SMNLTSS in patients with soiling was longest, followed by delay in those without any soiling, then delay in patients before operation, and then controls. In addition, significant differences were also noted between conduction delay of PNTML in controls and those who are incontinent and experience soiling (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively), and there were significant differences also noted between conduction delay of PNTML in patients before operation and those who are incontinent and experiencing soiling (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively). Conduction delay of PNTML and SMNLTSS were found in patients before operation rather than in controls. No significant differences were noted between conduction delay of PNTML and SMNLTSS in patients before operation and controls. Significant differences were also noted between conduction delay of PNTML and SMNLTSS in patients who are incontinent and experiencing soiling (P < 0.01, respectively).
CONCLUSION: These findings support the hypothesis that soiling after this procedure may be partially caused by damage to pudendal and sacral motor nerves (S2-4).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8878501     DOI: 10.1007/bf02054056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  5 in total

1.  Evaluation of vector manometry for characterization of functional outcome after restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  Andreas D Rink; Manfred Nagelschmidt; Irina Radinski; Karl-Heinz Vestweber
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-04-26       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Assessments of anal canal sensitivity in patients with soiling 5 years or more after colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, and ileal J pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  Ryouichi Tomita; Seigo Igarashi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Pudendal nerve terminal motor latency in patients with or without soiling 5 years or more after low anterior resection for lower rectal cancer.

Authors:  Ryouichi Tomita; Seigo Igarashi; Taro Ikeda; Tsugumichi Koshinaga; Shigeru Fujisaki; Katsuhisa Tanjoh
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Sacral nerve terminal motor latency in patients with or without soiling more than 2 years after low anterior resection for low rectal cancer.

Authors:  Ryouichi Tomita
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  A systematic review of sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence following ileal pouch anal anastomosis.

Authors:  E Kong; S Nikolaou; S Qiu; G Pellino; P Tekkis; C Kontovounisios
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2017-10-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.