Literature DB >> 18437481

Can community surgeons perform laparoscopic colorectal surgery with outcomes equivalent to tertiary care centers?

R Singh1, A Omiccioli, S G Hegge, C A McKinley.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic colorectal surgery (LCS) performed in tertiary care centers has been well studied. It has been shown to provide improved short-term outcomes and comparable long-term outcomes to the conventional open approach. However, LCS performed in a community hospital setting has not been well studied. In a previous paper, we presented the short-term outcomes of 100 LCS performed by two community surgeons with no formal training in LCS. In this follow-up study, we present both short- and longer-term outcomes for 250 patients who underwent LCS.
METHODS: This is a prospective study of 250 consecutive patients who underwent LCS at the North Bay District Hospital (a 200-bed community hospital located 350 km away from the nearest tertiary care center).
RESULTS: Between October 2000 and October 2006, 250 consecutive patients (130 women and 120 men, mean age of 64.4 +/- 13.7 years) underwent LCS for benign (N = 129) and malignant (N = 121) disease. Median operating time was 215.0 min (58.0-475.0 min) and the conversion rate was 7.2%. The intraoperative complication rate was 2.8%. There were 20 (8.0%) major postoperative complications and 42 (16.8%) minor postoperative complications. There was no intraoperative mortality. There were six 30-day mortalities due to ischemic bowel (1), stroke (1), myocardial infarction (3), and pneumonia (1). The median length of stay was 4.0 days (2.0-55.0 days). Disease-free survival for stages I-IV colorectal cancer (CRC) was 100, 97.2, 71.4, and 10% for a mean follow-up time of 36.9, 29.3, 27.9, and 21.1 months, respectively. The mean number of resected lymph nodes was 11.5 +/- 8.6.
CONCLUSION: We note that both our short and longer-term outcomes are similar to tertiary care centers. We therefore conclude that LCS can be performed in a community hospital setting with both short- and longer-term outcomes similar to tertiary care centers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18437481     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-008-9896-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  21 in total

Review 1.  Trocar site recurrence in laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Myth or real concern?

Authors:  O Zmora; E G Weiss
Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.495

2.  Laparoscopically assisted versus open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Jill Tinmouth; George Tomlinson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-08-26       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  The learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Preliminary results from a prospective analysis of 1194 laparoscopic-assisted colectomies.

Authors:  C L Bennett; S J Stryker; M R Ferreira; J Adams; R W Beart
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1997-01

4.  Prospective evaluation of laparoscopic surgery for rectosigmoidal and rectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Seiichiro Yamamoto; Masahiko Watanabe; Hirotoshi Hasegawa; Masaki Kitajima
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Long-term survival after laparoscopic colon resection for cancer: complete five-year follow-up.

Authors:  Henry J Lujan; Gustavo Plasencia; Moises Jacobs; Manuel Viamonte; Rene F Hartmann
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy).

Authors:  M Jacobs; J C Verdeja; H S Goldstein
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1991-09

7.  Laparoscopic colectomy.

Authors:  G A Fielding; J Lumley; L Nathanson; P Hewitt; M Rhodes; R Stitz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Pierre J Guillou; Philip Quirke; Helen Thorpe; Joanne Walker; David G Jayne; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 May 14-20       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 9.  Role of laparoscopic surgery for treatment of early colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  V W Fazio; F López-Kostner
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Early results of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Retrospective analysis of 372 patients treated by Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy (COST) Study Group.

Authors:  J W Fleshman; H Nelson; W R Peters; H C Kim; S Larach; R R Boorse; W Ambroze; P Leggett; R Bleday; S Stryker; B Christenson; S Wexner; A Senagore; D Rattner; J Sutton; A P Fine
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  4 in total

1.  What is the definition of "conversion" in laparoscopic colorectal surgery?

Authors:  Sherief Shawki; Badma Bashankaev; Paula Denoya; Christina Seo; Eric G Weiss; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Laparoscopic liver resection: basic skills for peripheral lesions.

Authors:  Michael D Kluger
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 7.293

3.  Annual case volume has no impact on patient outcomes in laparoscopic partial colectomy.

Authors:  Shaun C Daly; Matthew M Klairmont; Amanda B Francescatti; Jonathan A Myers; Daniel J Deziel; Minh B Luu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Colonic ischemia following surgery for sigmoid colon and rectal cancer: a study of 10 cases and a review of the literature.

Authors:  Min Geun Park; Hyuk Hur; Byung Soh Min; Kang Young Lee; Nam Kyu Kim
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 2.571

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.