Literature DB >> 18436124

Acute mortality in hospitalized patients undergoing echocardiography with and without an ultrasound contrast agent: results in 18,671 consecutive studies.

Lisa L Kusnetzky1, Adnan Khalid, Taiyeb M Khumri, Tabitha G Moe, Philip G Jones, Michael L Main.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We sought to define acute mortality in hospitalized patients undergoing clinically indicated echocardiography with and without use of an ultrasound contrast agent.
BACKGROUND: The U.S. Food and Drug Administration recently issued a boxed warning and new contraindications for the perflutren-containing ultrasound contrast agents following post-marketing reports of 4 patient deaths that were temporally related to Definity (Bristol-Myers Squibb Medical Imaging, Billerica, Massachusetts) administration. To appreciate the incremental risk of any medical procedure, the ambient risk of untoward outcome in the population in question must first be defined. There are no published data on short-term major adverse cardiac events in hospitalized patients undergoing echocardiography, either with or without administration of an ultrasound contrast agent.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of hospitalized patients undergoing clinically indicated echocardiography between January 2005 and October 2007, within Saint Luke's Health System, Kansas City, Missouri, was performed. Studies were separated into 2 groups, those performed without contrast enhancement (n = 12,475) and those performed with Definity (n = 6,196). Vital status within 24 h of the echocardiographic study was available for all patients using a combination of the Social Security Death Master File and Saint Luke's Health System medical records. Incidence of death within 24 h was compared by chi-square test between Definity and unenhanced procedures.
RESULTS: Of the 18,671 patient events, 72 patients died within 24 h. Of those that underwent unenhanced echocardiography, 46 died within 24 h (0.37%). Of patients receiving Definity during the echocardiogram, 26 died within 24 h (0.42%). There was no statistical difference between these 2 groups (p = 0.60). No patient died within 1 h of the echocardiographic study. In a random sampling from the unenhanced (n = 201) and Definity groups (n = 202), patients who underwent Definity-enhanced echocardiography exhibited higher clinical acuity, and more significant comorbidities.
CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 0.4% of hospitalized patients die within 24 h of echocardiography. There is no increased mortality risk associated with Definity-enhanced examinations, despite evidence for higher clinical acuity and more comorbid conditions in patients undergoing contrast studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18436124     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.03.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  33 in total

1.  Safety of echocardiographic contrast in hospitalized patients with pulmonary hypertension: a multi-center study.

Authors:  Omar Wever-Pinzon; Valentin Suma; Ameeta Ahuja; Jorge Romero; Nishtha Sareen; Sonia A Henry; Maria De Benedetti Zunino; Farhan F Chaudhry; Ramya S Suryadevara; Mark V Sherrid; Farooq A Chaudhry
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 2.  Contrast echocardiography: what have we learned from the new guidelines?

Authors:  Kevin Wei
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Assessment of tissue perfusion by contrast-enhanced ultrasound.

Authors:  Emilio Quaia
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Reverse engineering the ultrasound contrast agent.

Authors:  Mark A Borden; Kang-Ho Song
Journal:  Adv Colloid Interface Sci       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 12.984

5.  LV thrombus detection by routine echocardiography: insights into performance characteristics using delayed enhancement CMR.

Authors:  Jonathan W Weinsaft; Han W Kim; Anna Lisa Crowley; Igor Klem; Chetan Shenoy; Lowie Van Assche; Rhoda Brosnan; Dipan J Shah; Eric J Velazquez; Michele Parker; Robert M Judd; Raymond J Kim
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-07

Review 6.  Clinical uses of microbubbles in diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  David Cosgrove; Chris Harvey
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 7.  Contrast echocardiography: an update.

Authors:  Rajesh K Chelliah; Roxy Senior
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 8.  Contrast echocardiography: putting things into perspective - a Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Society of Echocardiography joint commentary.

Authors:  Robert Amyot; Eric Yu; George Honos; Jonathan Choy; Greg Schnell; Howard Leong-Poi
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.223

Review 9.  [Assessment of systolic function in patients with poor echogenicity: echocardiographic methods].

Authors:  F Weidemann; D Liu; M Niemann; S Herrmann; H Hu; P D Gaudron; G Ertl; K Hu
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 1.443

10.  Clinical application and laboratory protocols for performing contrast echocardiography.

Authors:  Adrian Chong; Brian Haluska; Sudhir Wahi
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2013-04-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.