Literature DB >> 19379642

Contrast echocardiography: an update.

Rajesh K Chelliah1, Roxy Senior.   

Abstract

Despite the advent of tissue harmonic imaging, echocardiography fails to produce diagnostically useful images in a significant proportion of patients. This often leads to inaccurate assessment of left ventricular function, necessitating the use of other, more expensive and laborious imaging techniques, purely for diagnostic purposes. This has facilitated the development of microbubbles, which together with ultrasound, produce opacification of the left ventricular cavity, thus enabling clear visualization and accurate quantification of left ventricular function. Contrast agents have also facilitated the development of myocardial contrast echocardiography. This allows assessment of cardiac anatomy, function, and perfusion, all in one sitting, by the bedside. Contrast ultrasound imaging also has now been applied to newer techniques (eg, real-time three-dimensional echocardiography) and is also showing promise in other cardiovascular scans (eg, carotid ultrasound for intima-media thickness). Thus, contrast agents play a pivotal role in noninvasive cardiovascular imaging and its use worldwide is likely to increase.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19379642     DOI: 10.1007/s11886-009-0031-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep        ISSN: 1523-3782            Impact factor:   2.931


  36 in total

1.  Myocardial contrast echocardiography accurately reflects transmurality of myocardial necrosis and predicts contractile reserve after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Rajesh Janardhanan; James C C Moon; Dudley J Pennell; Roxy Senior
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.749

2.  Analysis of regional left ventricular function by cineventriculography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and unenhanced and contrast-enhanced echocardiography: a multicenter comparison of methods.

Authors:  Rainer Hoffmann; Stephan von Bardeleben; Jaroslaw D Kasprzak; Adrian C Borges; Folkert ten Cate; Christian Firschke; Stephane Lafitte; Nidal Al-Saadi; Stefanie Kuntz-Hehner; Georg Horstick; Christian Greis; Marc Engelhardt; Jean Louis Vanoverschelde; Harald Becher
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Clinical and economic impact of stress echocardiography compared with exercise electrocardiography in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome but negative troponin: a prospective randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Paramjit Jeetley; Leah Burden; Boyka Stoykova; Roxy Senior
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 29.983

4.  Diagnostic accuracy and prognostic value of dobutamine stress myocardial contrast echocardiography in patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Jeane M Tsutsui; Feng Xie; Edward L O'Leary; Abdou Elhendy; James R Anderson; Anna C McGrain; Thomas R Porter
Journal:  Echocardiography       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.724

5.  Thinking outside the "box"-the ultrasound contrast controversy.

Authors:  Michael L Main; Jonathan H Goldman; Paul A Grayburn
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of intraplaque neovascularization in carotid arteries: correlation with histology and plaque echogenicity.

Authors:  Stefano Coli; Marco Magnoni; Giuseppe Sangiorgi; Massimiliano M Marrocco-Trischitta; Giulio Melisurgo; Alessandro Mauriello; Luigi Spagnoli; Roberto Chiesa; Domenico Cianflone; Attilio Maseri
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 7.  Contrast echocardiography: evidence-based recommendations by European Association of Echocardiography.

Authors:  Roxy Senior; Harald Becher; Mark Monaghan; Luciano Agati; Jose Zamorano; Jean Louis Vanoverschelde; Petros Nihoyannopoulos
Journal:  Eur J Echocardiogr       Date:  2009-03

8.  The safety of deFinity and Optison for ultrasound image enhancement: a retrospective analysis of 78,383 administered contrast doses.

Authors:  Kevin Wei; Sharon L Mulvagh; Lisa Carson; Ravin Davidoff; Ruvin Gabriel; Richard A Grimm; Stephanie Wilson; Lorrie Fane; Charles A Herzog; William A Zoghbi; Rhonda Taylor; Michael Farrar; Farooq A Chaudhry; Thomas R Porter; Waleed Irani; Roberto M Lang
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 5.251

9.  Myocardial contrast echocardiography versus Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction score in patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain and a nondiagnostic electrocardiogram.

Authors:  Khim Leng Tong; Sanjiv Kaul; Xin-Qun Wang; Diana Rinkevich; Saul Kalvaitis; Todd Belcik; Wolfgang Lepper; William A Foster; Kevin Wei
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-09-06       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Prognostic value of myocardial viability detected by myocardial contrast echocardiography early after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Girish Dwivedi; Rajesh Janardhanan; Sajad A Hayat; John M Swinburn; Roxy Senior
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-07-06       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  2 in total

1.  Stress echocardiography with contrast for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2010-06-01

2.  Use of contrast agents with echocardiography in patients with suboptimal echocardiography: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2010-06-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.