Literature DB >> 18435807

Positive surgical margins during robotic radical prostatectomy: a contemporary analysis of risk factors.

Michael Liss1, Kathryn Osann, David Ornstein.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the risk factors (clinical, pathological and technical) for positive surgical margins (PSMs) after robotically assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), as a PSM is associated with an increased risk of biochemical recurrence and often responsible for significant patient anxiety. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between November 2003 and March 2007, 216 consecutive patients had an RARP by one fellowship-trained urological oncologist. The surgical pathological specimens were fixed and processed using standard techniques, and assessed by a pathologist at the same institution. A PSM was defined as the presence of cancer adjacent to the inked margin. The clinical charts were reviewed retrospectively under an approved institutional review board protocol. Univariable and multivariable methods, including logistic regression models, were used to analyse the clinical, pathological and technical risk factors for PSM.
RESULTS: The overall prevalence of PSM was 14.8% (32/216), and 5.4% (8/149) for pT2 cancers. The only preoperative factor that was associated with a greater risk of a PSM was the serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level (P = 0.012) and PSA density (P = 0.005). Age, clinical stage and clinical Gleason grade were not predictors of a PSM. The overall and pT2 PSM rate remained constant throughout the series of 216 patients (P = 0.371), indicating that the initial experience for RARP was not associated with a significantly greater risk of a PSM. However, there was a small independent 'learning curve' effect, with a lower rate of PSM associated with each increment of 25 patients (odds ratio 0.8, 95% confidence interval 0.6-1.0), supported by the significantly decreasing trend in PSM for pT3 cancers over time (P = 0.031) Although there was no significant increase over time in PSM with the use of an endostapler to control the dorsal venous complex (DVC), there was a significant learning effect, with a decrease in the PSM rate specifically in pT3 cancers using the suture technique (P = 0.005). A nerve-sparing procedure increased the risk of PSM in multivariable analysis (P = 0.03). As expected, pathological stage and pathological Gleason grade were the strongest predictors of PSM (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: The most important risk factors for a PSM after RARP are the preoperative PSA level, PSA density, pathological stage and Gleason grade. PSM rates for a surgeon in their initial experience can be comparable to that of a surgeon experienced in RARP. Using a stapling device to control the DVC does not appear to increase the risk of a PSM, although nerve-sparing increases the rates of PSM in extraprostatic prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18435807      PMCID: PMC4041686          DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07672.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  19 in total

Review 1.  Evidence from robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Vincenzo Ficarra; Stefano Cavalleri; Giacomo Novara; Maurizio Aragona; Walter Artibani
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: the University of Leipzig experience of 1,300 cases.

Authors:  Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Robert Rabenalt; Minh Do; Michael C Truss; Martin Burchardt; Thomas R Herrmann; Thilo Schwalenberg; Panagiotis Kallidonis; Evangelos N Liatsikos
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-03-02       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Robotic versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Thomas E Ahlering
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Urol       Date:  2004-12

4.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: is intact organ removal attainable? Study of margin status.

Authors:  Danny M Rabah; Paul F Schellhammer; Jose I Diaz; Ingolf Tuerk; Douglas W Soderdahl; Michael D Fabrizio
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  Peter Swindle; James A Eastham; Makoto Ohori; Michael W Kattan; Thomas Wheeler; Norio Maru; Kevin Slawin; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: impact of learning curve on oncologic outcomes.

Authors:  Fatih Atug; Erik P Castle; Sudesh K Srivastav; Scott V Burgess; Raju Thomas; Rodney Davis
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-03-10       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Positive surgical margins after radical retropubic prostatectomy: the influence of site and number on progression.

Authors:  Mario Sofer; Kara L Hamilton-Nelson; Francisco Civantos; Mark S Soloway
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  The extent of biopsy involvement as an independent predictor of extraprostatic extension and surgical margin status in low risk prostate cancer: implications for treatment selection.

Authors:  X Gao; N Mohideen; R C Flanigan; W B Waters; E M Wojcik; C R Leman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Robotic radical prostatectomy in the community setting--the learning curve and beyond: initial 200 cases.

Authors:  Vipul R Patel; A S Tully; R Holmes; J Lindsay
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Prostate-specific antigen density predicts adverse pathology and increased risk of biochemical failure.

Authors:  Mohamed H Radwan; Yan Yan; Jason R Luly; Robert S Figenshau; Steven B Brandes; Sam B Bhayani; Arnold D Bullock; Ye Liefu; Gerald L Andriole; Adam S Kibel
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.649

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  The current status of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Prokar Dasgupta; Roger S Kirby
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 3.285

2.  Preoperative characteristics of the P.R.O.S.T.A.T.E. scores: a novel predictive tool for the risk of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Ben Xu; Cheng Luo; Qian Zhang; Jie Jin
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  Prostate cancer at the peripheral end of prostate biopsy specimen predicts increased risk of positive resection margin after radical prostatectomy: results of a prospective multi-institutional study.

Authors:  Anton Ponholzer; Sophina Trubel; Paul Schramek; Florian Wimpissinger; Hans Feichtinger; Christopher Springer; Clemens Wehrberger; Katja Fischereder; Karl Pummer; Thomas Martini; Roman Mayr; Armin Pycha; Stephan Madersbacher
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-02-08       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Perioperative, oncological and functional outcomes of the first robotic prostatectomy program in Quebec: Single fellowship-trained surgeon's experience of 250 cases.

Authors:  Naif Al-Hathal; Assaad El-Hakim
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  A multi-surgeon learning curve analysis of overall and site-specific positive surgical margins after RARP and implications for training.

Authors:  Carlo Gandi; Angelo Totaro; Riccardo Bientinesi; Filippo Marino; Francesco Pierconti; Maurizio Martini; Andrea Russo; Marco Racioppi; PierFrancesco Bassi; Emilio Sacco
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2022-02-28

6.  Predictive preoperative factors for positive surgical margins in robotic radical prostatectomy in low-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Turgay Turan; Uğur Boylu; Cem Başataç; Eyüp Gümüş
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2013-06

7.  Does robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy enable to obtain adequate oncological and functional outcomes during the learning curve? From the Korean experience.

Authors:  Young Hwii Ko; Jeong Hyeon Ban; Seok Ho Kang; Hong Seok Park; Jeong Gu Lee; Duck Ki Yoon; Je Jong Kim; Jun Cheon; Vipul R Patel
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2009-01-19       Impact factor: 3.285

8.  Pathological features of prostate cancer in men treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in the Middle East.

Authors:  Saad Aldousari; Said Yaiesh; Omar Alkandari; Sundus Hussein
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2020-05-06

Review 9.  Comparative effectiveness of robotic and open radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Rodrigo Rodrigues Pessoa; Paul Maroni; Janet Kukreja; Simon P Kim
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-05

10.  Prediction of a positive surgical margin and biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Ching-Wei Yang; Hsiao-Hsien Wang; Mohamed Fayez Hassouna; Manish Chand; William J S Huang; Hsiao-Jen Chung
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.