Literature DB >> 18435191

The effect of polishing techniques and time on the surface characteristics and sealing ability of resin composite restorations after one-year storage.

Maximiliano Sérgio Cenci1, Daniela Venturini, Tatiana Pereira-Cenci, Evandro Piva, Flávio Fernando Demarco.   

Abstract

Since there is a lack of information on the surface properties of composite restorations achieved with standard polishing procedures after aging processes, this study evaluated the effects of immediate (IM) and delayed (DE) polishing on the surface roughness (Ra), microhardness (KHN) and microleakage (ML) of microfilled (Filtek A110) and hybrid (Filtek Z250) resin composites after one-year storage. Standardized preparations were made on the buccal surface of 256 bovine teeth, where half were restored with each composite. For each composite, the specimens were randomly allocated to two subgroups. The first group (IM) was polished immediately after gross finishing using three different systems/techniques (n=16): Sof-Lex, Flexicups and Flexicups + Jiffy Polishing Brush + Flexibuffs (sequential), then stored for three weeks in saline. The DE group was stored for two weeks, polished with the same systems and stored for one week. From each subgroup, eight specimens were assessed after three weeks regarding Ra, KHN and ML (baseline), andthe eight remaining specimens were stored for one year before analysis. The data were analyzed (alpha=0.05) with ANOVA, paired Student's t-test (Ra and KHN) or Kruskal-Wallis and Signed Rank tests (microleakage). After one year, microfilled resin composite specimens showed the lowest Ra and KHN (p<0.05). N o differencein microleakage was observed among the different groups (p>0.05). The sequential technique provided the lowest roughness and Sof-Lex the lowest hardness (p<0.05). IM showed similar or better performance than DE for ML and Ra (p<0.05). In conclusion, aging increased the composites Ra and ML in all experimental conditions (p<0.05).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18435191     DOI: 10.2341/07-66

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Dent        ISSN: 0361-7734            Impact factor:   2.440


  10 in total

1.  The influence of finishing/polishing time and cooling system on surface roughness and microhardness of two different types of composite resin restorations.

Authors:  Raja Rajeswari Kaminedi; Narendra Varma Penumatsa; Tulasi Priya; Kusai Baroudi
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2014-12

2.  Short-and long-term bond strengths of a gold standard two-step self-etch adhesive system to dentin: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Safa Tuncer; Neslihan Tekce; Dial Pashaev; Mustafa Demirci; Canan Baydemir
Journal:  J Istanb Univ Fac Dent       Date:  2015-04-29

3.  How Can Different Polishing Timing Influence Methacrylate and Dimethacrylate Bulk Fill Composites? Evaluation of Chemical and Physical Properties.

Authors:  Riccardo Monterubbianesi; Vincenzo Tosco; Simona Sabbatini; Giulia Orilisi; Carla Conti; Mutlu Özcan; Giovanna Orsini; Angelo Putignano
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Finishing and Polishing of Composite Restoration: Assessment of Knowledge, Attitude and Practice Among Various Dental Professionals in India.

Authors:  Sankar Vishwanath; Sadasiva Kadandale; Senthil Kumar Kumarappan; Anupama Ramachandran; Manu Unnikrishnan; Honap Manjiri Nagesh
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-01-03

5.  Effect of Chemical and Mechanical Degradation on Surface Roughness, Topography, Gloss, and Polish Retention of Three Composites Polished with Five Polishing Systems.

Authors:  Fatemeh Farzaneh; Mahshid Mohammadi-Bassir; Mohammad Bagher Rezvani; Fahimeh Dehestani Ardakani
Journal:  Front Dent       Date:  2021-11-01

6.  Effects of delayed finishing/polishing on surface roughness, hardness and gloss of tooth-coloured restorative materials.

Authors:  A Ruya Yazici; Duygu Tuncer; Sibel Antonson; Alev Onen; Evren Kilinc
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2010-01

7.  Anterior composite restorations in clinical practice: findings from a survey with general dental practitioners.

Authors:  Flávio Fernando Demarco; Rudimar Antonio Baldissera; Francine Cardozo Madruga; Roberto Cuchiara Simões; Rafael Guerra Lund; Marcos Britto Correa; Maximiliano Sérgio Cenci
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.698

8.  Surface Roughness, Microhardness, and Microleakage of a Silorane-Based Composite Resin after Immediate or Delayed Finishing/Polishing.

Authors:  Fernanda Carvalho Rezende Lins; Raquel Conceição Ferreira; Rodrigo Richard Silveira; Carolina Nemésio Barros Pereira; Allyson Nogueira Moreira; Claudia Silami Magalhães
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2016-02-09

9.  Effect of Different Polishing Systems on the Surface Roughness and Gloss of Novel Nanohybrid Resin Composites.

Authors:  Hanan A N Soliman; Naglaa Rizk Elkholany; Hamdi H Hamama; Fatma M El-Sharkawy; Salah H Mahmoud; John C Comisi
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2020-10-27

10.  Effect of finishing/polishing techniques and time on surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials.

Authors:  Prashanthi Sampath Madhyastha; Shreya Hegde; N Srikant; Ravindra Kotian; Srividhya Sriraman Iyer
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.