| Literature DB >> 18431743 |
Susan J Ramus1, Robert A Vierkant2, Sharon E Johnatty3, Malcolm C Pike4, David J Van Den Berg4, Anna H Wu4, Celeste Leigh Pearce4, Usha Menon5, Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj5, Simon A Gayther1, Richard A DiCioccio6, Valerie McGuire7, Alice S Whittemore7, Honglin Song8, Douglas F Easton9, Paul D P Pharoah8, Montserrat Garcia-Closas10, Stephen Chanock10, Jolanta Lissowska11, Louise Brinton10, Kathryn L Terry12, Daniel W Cramer12, Shelley S Tworoger13, Susan E Hankinson13, Andrew Berchuck14, Patricia G Moorman15, Joellen M Schildkraut15, Julie M Cunningham2, Mark Liebow2, Susanne Krüger Kjaer16, Estrid Hogdall16, Claus Hogdall17, Jan Blaakaer18, Roberta B Ness19, Kirsten B Moysich6, Robert P Edwards20, Michael E Carney21, Galina Lurie21, Marc T Goodman21, Shan Wang-Gohrke22, Silke Kropp23, Jenny Chang-Claude23, Penelope M Webb3, Xiaoqing Chen3, Jonathan Beesley3, Georgia Chenevix-Trench3, Ellen L Goode2.
Abstract
The Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium selected 7 candidate single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), for which there is evidence from previous studies of an association with variation in ovarian cancer or breast cancer risks. The SNPs selected for analysis were F31I (rs2273535) in AURKA, N372H (rs144848) in BRCA2, rs2854344 in intron 17 of RB1, rs2811712 5' flanking CDKN2A, rs523349 in the 3' UTR of SRD5A2, D302H (rs1045485) in CASP8 and L10P (rs1982073) in TGFB1. Fourteen studies genotyped 4,624 invasive epithelial ovarian cancer cases and 8,113 controls of white non-Hispanic origin. A marginally significant association was found for RB1 when all studies were included [ordinal odds ratio (OR) 0.88 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.79-1.00) p = 0.041 and dominant OR 0.87 (95% CI 0.76-0.98) p = 0.025]; when the studies that originally suggested an association were excluded, the result was suggestive although no longer statistically significant (ordinal OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.79-1.06). This SNP has also been shown to have an association with decreased risk in breast cancer. There was a suggestion of an association for AURKA, when one study that caused significant study heterogeneity was excluded [ordinal OR 1.10 (95% CI 1.01-1.20) p = 0.027; dominant OR 1.12 (95% CI 1.01-1.24) p = 0.03]. The other 5 SNPs in BRCA2, CDKN2A, SRD5A2, CASP8 and TGFB1 showed no association with ovarian cancer risk; given the large sample size, these results can also be considered to be informative. These null results for SNPs identified from relatively large initial studies shows the importance of replicating associations by a consortium approach. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18431743 PMCID: PMC2667795 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.23448
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Cancer ISSN: 0020-7136 Impact factor: 7.396